The court concluded that the plaintiffs failed to provide any admissible evidence to sufficiently counter the defendants' evidence that they electronically signed the contract for home inspection services, and that the plaintiffs' breach of...
Holding that MCL 554.139 did not apply where the plaintiff was the co-owner of a unit in the condo development, and that he was neither a licensee nor an invitee, the court concluded that he was not owed any duty by the defendants under premises...
The court held that the plaintiff-bank's (Capital One) foreclosure claim survived the parties' case evaluation acceptance and thus, the trial court did not err in considering Capital One's summary disposition motion following the evaluation award....
The court held that the trial court properly terminated the respondent-mother's parental rights to the children where at least one statutory ground for termination existed and it was in the children's best interests. The trial court terminated...
The court reversed the district court's ruling that the six-year statute of limitations had run on the plaintiffs' action to enjoin the U.S. Forest Service from enforcing its "no gas-powered motorboat" restrictions on the lake on which they owned...
The court held that the trial court properly found that the reason for setting aside its original order revoking an affidavit of parentage executed by the mother (Johnson) and her then significant other (Young) did not fall under MCR 2.612(C)(1)(a)...
The trial court properly granted summary disposition to the defendant in this foreclosure of an undeveloped parcel. Defendant "initiated foreclosure by advertisement in early 2012, and conducted the sheriff's sale in March of that year." In June,...
Where the plaintiffs sued Kentucky and defendant-Sunrise, a child-care facility, for allegedly violating the Establishment Clause, the district court erred by finding that its dismissal order in the case was not a consent decree and by ruling that...
The court concluded that the absence of hazing did not preclude defendants-AKA and Nelson (an AKA regional director) from withdrawing plaintiff's membership rights pending an investigation. Further, their promise to conduct a fair investigation...
The trial court acted correctly when it prevented defendant-White from suggesting to the jury that plaintiff-Associated Construction was obligated to investigate his assertions that he could pay for the renovation project. Thus, the court affirmed...
Based on the binding precedent of Powers, the court reversed the trial court's order granting the appellees' summary disposition motion and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings. They contested the decedent's trust and will...
The court affirmed in part and reversed in part an order granting summary disposition in favor of respondents-Oakland County, the OCWRC, and the county's Water Resource Commissioner in this petition for writ of certiorari challenging the...
Neither the "domestic-relations" nor the "probate exception" to federal diversity jurisdiction barred plaintiff-Chevalier from bringing tort and contract claims against her former spouse to recover on a series of unpaid loans. The...
Holding that the circuit court erred by reversing the district court's judgment of possession entered in favor of the plaintiff-bank and remanding this matter to the district court for an eviction trial, the court reversed the circuit court and...
Agreeing with the defendant that "the trial court failed to engage in a meaningful assessment as to the knowing, intelligent, and voluntary nature" of his waiver of counsel, the court reversed his aggravated stalking conviction and remanded for a...
Concluding that the alleged agreement was not a valid contract, primarily due to a lack of consideration and mutuality of obligation, the court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the plaintiff's claims based on the alleged agreement....
The court held that the trial court did not err in finding the cross-defendants-Trajcevski entities (Trajcevski) liable for certain royalties under a land contract and awarding treble damages and attorney fees. Plaintiffs sued the defendants-Furgal...
Concluding that the alleged loan modification was oral, the court held that the trial court properly granted summary disposition in plaintiff-Comerica Bank's favor. Comerica sued defendants-Cheryl Maniaci and her company, Prickles, "seeking full...
Holding that the Court of Appeals properly found that MCL 339.2412(1) was inapplicable, but erred in finding that the contract between the plaintiffs-homeowners and the defendants-unlicensed builder (Willis) was void ab initio, the court affirmed...
The court affirmed the trial court's order compelling the plaintiff to carry out acts necessary to complete the settlement and carry out the refinancing. The appeal arose out of a feud between two brothers, plaintiff and defendant-Terry Yaryan,...
The court held that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant's motion to suppress the results of his hospital blood draw, in instructing the jury on reckless driving causing death, or in scoring his OVs. However, it was unclear whether...
The district court erred by dismissing the plaintiffs-alleged gang members' (the "Juggalos'") constitutional claims based on lack of standing where they claimed they suffered violations of their constitutional rights at the hands of state and local...
Holding that the trial court correctly determined that plaintiff's policy fell under § 2827 and thus, the defendant-insurer was "required to remit the policy limits to plaintiff without regard to whether the structure was actually repaired or...
The court vacated the trial court's order awarding confinement expenses to the extent it required the defendant-father to reimburse the plaintiff-mother for out of network costs, and remanded the matter to the trial court to determine whether the...
The court held that the trial court did not err by granting the defendant-county's motion for summary disposition and quieting title in favor of the defendant-management company (PJM) or by dismissing the plaintiffs' case as to all defendants. The...
Holding that the trial court did not clearly err in finding that termination of the respondent-father's parental rights was proper under § (g) and that termination was in the child's best interests, the court affirmed the order terminating his...
The court held that the FOC referee erred by changing primary physical custody of the child from the plaintiff-mother to the defendant-father because her order was issued and entered in violation of multiple procedural rules and substantive...
Holding that plaintiff-Auto-Owners did not waive its right to rescind or void the policy, and that it was entitled to rescind the policy even if the misrepresentations were innocent, the court affirmed summary disposition for Auto-Owners. However,...
Because it was "definitely and firmly convinced that the probate court erred" in finding that the evidence satisfied the criteria for a conservatorship to be appropriate under MCL 700.5401(3), the court reversed the order establishing a...
Holding that the plaintiff-LLC lacked statutory standing to challenge the results of the zoning referendum election under MCL 600.4545 because it was not a citizen of the county, the court reversed the trial court's order denying the intervening...
The court held that the trial court properly terminated the respondent-mother's parental rights to the child where at least one statutory ground for termination existed and it was in the child's best interests. The trial court terminated...
The court affirmed the trial court's judgment of no cause of action, entered after a bench trial, where plaintiffs alleged that defendants committed negligent misrepresentation during the course of a real estate transaction. Plaintiffs alleged...
The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by entering a judgment of foreclosure and dismissing the defendants-homeowners' (Michael and Beth Dusseau) counterclaims because the parties entered into a binding and enforceable...
Holding that the trial court did not clearly err in finding that § (c)(ii) was established by clear and convincing evidence, or in finding that termination was in the children's best interests, the court affirmed the trial court's order...
The court held that the trial court did not err in ruling for the third-party defendant (Taylor) and her company (the plaintiff), declaring plaintiff the owner of two parcels of land previously owned by the defendants and dismissing their...
The court affirmed the trial court's grant of (1) joint physical custody of the parties' children and (2) mid-week parenting time to plaintiff-Matthew (the father). The parties married in 2000, and had 2 children over the course of their marriage....
Holding that it did not promote the children's best interests to continue their education in a school 14 miles from the home of defendant-Garrison (the father) and 28 miles from the home of plaintiff-Zalewski (the mother), the court reversed the...
The court held that the record sufficiently evidenced the DHS's compliance with the ICWA and MIFPA notice requirements. Also, the trial court did not violate the respondent-father's rights under the MMMA. Finally, he was not denied the effective...
The court reversed and remanded for entry of an order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant-Great Lakes (garnishor). Plaintiff-KBD sued Great Lakes. Great Lakes obtained a favorable verdict that also resulted in an award of costs and...
The court held that the trial court did not err in its division of the parties' marital property, but remanded for further consideration of the defendant-ex-wife's request for attorney fees, spousal support, and health insurance. In the divorce,...
