Thus, the court affirmed his convictions. However, as to his sentencing, it remanded for Crosbyproceedings pursuant to Lockridge. He was sentenced to concurrent prison terms of 15 to 30 years for the murder conviction and 7 to 15 years for the...
The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's orders denying appellant-Ellis's (mother) motions, and remanded the case to the trial court for clarification of the validity of the agreements. It also reversed the trial court's award of $750 in...
As to § (c)(i), more than 182 days elapsed between the issuance of the initial disposition order and the termination decision, and the conditions that led to adjudication, namely her mental health problems, her failure to obtain adequate housing,...
He was convicted of carjacking, armed robbery, unlawful imprisonment, felonious assault, CCW, FIP, felony-firearm, and fourth-degree child abuse related to the carjacking and robbery of a cab driver (S). Defendant argued that S was exposed to an...
Thus, it reversed and remanded for entry of an order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant. The case arose out of plaintiff's claim for PIP benefits-under a no-fault policy issued by defendant to plaintiff's purported "relative,"...
Thus, the court affirmed the trial court's order granting summary disposition in favor of defendants. The case concerned the ownership of a rectangular strip of land or lot referred to as the "fire-lane" that runs through part of a platted...
They argued that the DHHS did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that they failed to provide proper care or custody for the child and that there was no reasonable expectation that they would be able to do so within a reasonable time...
The parties entered into a consent JOD that covered custody and property division. It also reserved the issue of spousal support "until the expiration of four years from the date of entry of this Judgment of Divorce." Defendant later moved for...
Otto and Margaret signed trust documents in 1993. They amended the trust the next year. Otto died in 2005. In 2011, "Margaret attempted to amend the trust to provide that, on the death of the surviving spouse," a piece of real property would go to...
The parties were engaged in a long-standing dispute over natural drainage of water from defendants' higher elevation property across plaintiffs' lot. Plaintiffs moved their septic field and built a berm near the property line that caused water to...
Although Kayko worked fewer hours and had more opportunity to tend to KKG "on a daily basis, this did not negate that Govitz equally loved his son and could care for him." Accordingly, the evidence did not preponderate against the trial court's...
The defendant (ex-wife) claimed the funds were subsequently used to purchase the marital home. She did not dispute, and the record confirmed, that the property was initially plaintiff's separate property. He purchased the property in 1975 and made...
The case arose from a long-simmering disagreement between the father and his son as to a 10-acre parcel of property. On appeal, defendants argued that the trial court erred in granting the father's motion for summary disposition and abused its...
Respondent contended that the trial court erred by receiving the expert testimony of Dr. C, because the DHHS failed to specifically designate her as an expert on its witness list. She also asserted that C's testimony did not satisfy the...
In 2012, plaintiff's then-wife filed for divorce and paid $230 in filing fees. He later filed a motion as to custody of his child in the divorce action, and paid an $80 FOC fee, collected by the clerk of the court pursuant to the former MCL...
On appeal, defendant argued that the trial court committed clear legal error and violated her Second Amendment right by punishing her for lawful possession of a firearm in its analysis for best-interest factor (l). However, the trial court did not...
Plaintiff filed a paternity action claiming defendant was the father of her child. He was eventually served, but claimed the trial court lacked jurisdiction. The trial court disagreed and ordered a paternity test. When he failed to comply, it...
J had two daughters, the petitioner-Kathy Crowder and intervenor-Nancy Baruzzini, and a brother, intervenor-Jack Donaldson, the husband of the respondent-Veronica Donaldson. The will specifically and explicitly disinherited Nancy and Kathy, and...
She claimed that the trial court erred in adjudicating her as unfit. The trial court erred in finding that jurisdiction was established under MCL 712A.2(b)(2) by a preponderance of the evidence. "Under this statute, jurisdiction may be taken over a...
Thus, the court affirmed the trial court's order granting spousal support in favor of the defendant-ex-wife for $2,451 per month. On appeal, the plaintiff-ex-husband argued that the trial court erroneously calculated the parties' respective...
Defendant was arguing with his wife on the side of the road when two men pulled over. As the situation escalated, one of the men allegedly began choking defendant. Defendant pulled out a utility knife and held it in the air. The men got back in...
The evidence showed "that the child had resided with plaintiff her entire life, apart from the time spent in defendant's care." Plaintiff testified that she earned a steady income and resided "in a home where the child has her own bedroom....
Kenneth Koehler passed away with no will, no spouse, no children, and no siblings, and his parents and grandparents predeceased him. His paternal grandfather, Carl Cedric Umble, was killed before his son, Carl Koehler (Kenneth's father) was born....
The relevant question was whether respondents "were afforded notice that satisfies due process, not whether petitioner met each provision and requirement of the GPTA." They claimed that because respondent-RFA's "mortgage was recorded before the...
The court rejected plaintiff's argument that the award of spousal support was unfair and inequitable under the circumstances. "Although the trial court imputed $35,000 to defendant in annual income," he was unemployed and needed "to secure and...
The trial court properly granted summary disposition in defendants' favor. Plaintiff-Janie Burnham (Burnham) slipped and fell in a puddle of water in what the parties describe as the "pit" area of defendant-Hobby Lobby's store. On appeal,...
During their marriage, John designated Nancy as his sole named beneficiary on the group life insurance policy provided by his employer. The divorce judgment included a provision for cancellation of each spouse's interest in any existing life...
"The hearing referee who conducted the adjudication trial stated that it was 'enter[ing] a default' against respondent because he failed to appear for the trial." However, there was "no authority for the proposition that a respondent in child...
Holding that the order failed to appreciate that the shift in parenting time altered the child's ECE, the court reversed the trial court's order and remanded. The order determined the parties' minor child, MS, would attend a particular school and...
Holding that the noncompetition clause in the plaintiff-employer's employee handbook was unreasonable, the court limited the injunction against "'obtaining employment, either directly or indirectly, from any current or previously contracted client...
The court held that the trial court did not err by granting summary disposition for the defendant-property owner in the plaintiff's premises liability action because "the uneven pavement and dim lighting were open and obvious conditions that were...
The court affirmed the district court's judgment denying the defendant-police officer's (Officer Flake) defense of qualified immunity on the plaintiffs' claims of excessive force and arrest without probable cause. It dismissed defendant-City of...
The court held that when "¶ 4.B of the 2010 MOU is read in its entirety, the paragraph is unambiguous and it does not create the vested right asserted by" plaintiff/counter-defendant-Cass. This was a breach of contract action involving a contract...
Holding that the plaintiff-city's noise ordinance was unconstitutionally vague, the court reversed and remanded for dismissal of the citations against the defendants-bar owners and employee. Defendants were issued the citations on the ground that...
The court held that the trial court applied the correct standard of review in granting the defendant-snow removal company summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(8), and correctly determined that the plaintiffs were not entitled to relief under a...
Holding that genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether the option to purchase was specifically assigned and whether it was for the land or the land and the restaurant on the property, the court reversed the trial court's grant of...
The trial court properly granted termination of the respondents-parents' parental rights to the child where the statutory grounds for termination were established by clear and convincing evidence and it was in the child's best interests. They...
The court reversed the trial court's grant of summary disposition in favor of defendants on plaintiff's breach of contract claim, and remanded for entry of summary disposition in favor of plaintiff on that claim. It affirmed the trial court's grant...
There was sufficient evidence to convict defendant-Thomasine Robinson, a mayoral candidate in the 2012 election, of "vote buying" where a witness testified that Thomasine Robinson gave her $20 to vote in the election. There was also evidence that...
