CONTRACTS 4: An agreement to settle a pending lawsuit constitutes a contract.

In this case, the trial court granted plaintiffs’ motion to enforce a settlement agreement. Defendants argued that the parties had reached only a preliminary agreement in principle rather than a final binding settlement and that the alleged agreement did not satisfy the requirements of MCR 2.507(G).

Plaintiffs initiated this action as a result of a dispute over the use and maintenance of an access easement on defendants’ property that plaintiffs had used over several decades. Defendants filed a counterclaim alleging encroachment along the driveway and encroachment on their property following plaintiffs’ removal of a farm fence along the westerly boundary of easement. The parties’ attorneys entered into negotiations and reached a settlement in principle as documented in a series of e-mail exchanges.

Subsequently, the parties reported to the trial court that they had reached an agreement in principle, and they requested two stipulated adjournments in order to allow the parties to begin performance and to complete the settlement. Several months later, however, defendants’ counsel withdrew as attorneys for defendants, and defendants denied that an enforceable settlement had been achieved.

The trial court subsequently granted plaintiffs’ motion to enforce the settlement agreement.

Defendants argue that the trial court abused its discretion in granting plaintiff’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement because the requirements of MCR 2.507(G) were not met.

An agreement to settle a pending lawsuit constitutes a contract, and therefore the agreement is governed by legal principles applicable to the interpretation and construction of contracts. Like other contracts, a settlement agreement must include an offer and acceptance, as well as mutual assent or a meeting of the minds on all essential terms. Acceptance must be unambiguous and in strict conformity with the offer; otherwise, no contract is formed.

Also, an agreement or consent between the parties or their attorneys respecting the proceedings in an action is not binding unless it was made in open court, or unless evidence of the agreement is in writing, subscribed by the party against whom the agreement is offered or by that party’s attorney.

A signature at the bottom of an e-mail meets this criterion so long as the e-mail also contains the terms of the settlement.

In this case, on December 13 plaintiffs’ counsel sent an e-mail to defendants’ counsel that stated the terms of the settlement.  Both the December 13 reply, which specifically indicated defendants’ counsel’s agreement, and the December 15 reply, which confirmed that the parties had an agreement in principle, contained the attorney’s name typed at the end of the message. Therefore, the subscription requirement of MCR 2.507(G) was satisfied.

The proposed settlement agreement e-mails, stipulations evidencing that an agreement was reached, and the parties’ actions were sufficient to create an enforceable contract between the parties.

Aldrich Legal Services represent clients in all areas of real estate law and business law. You will work with an attorney who has the extensive contract experience necessary to help you reach an effective resolution that protects your interests.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Top 3 Misconceptions on Power of Attorney

Considering leaving the country for a long time while maintaining a business or selling a home in the US? Were you recently diagnosed with a terminal or degenerative disease? For these and many other issues, it may become necessary for someone...

FAMILY LAW 29: Quitclaim deed signed after prenuptial agreement prevails.

The court ruled that title to the land prevails and that once the deed was signed, the property became the undivided whole interest for both the decedent and appellee and became appellee’s property upon the decedent’s death. Consequently, the court concluded that the prenuptial agreement did not have any impact on the property rights of appellee in this case.

Know the Differences between Annulment and Divorce

  Marriage can end through two ways: divorce and annulment. Though both of these options have the same result, each has different requirements. There are many similarities and differences between a divorce and an annulment, so many...

Understanding Vaping Laws for Minors

  Vaping is a fad that is quickly solidifying into a stable industry of products around the world. Vaping and electronic cigarette (or e-cigarette) use have dramatically increased from roughly “seven million [users] in 2011 to 35...

Michigans New Marijuana Laws

The 2018 ballot initiative titled “the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA) passed with 56% of the vote. Michigan joins nine states and D.C. in legalizing some form of recreational marijuana use.  Due to the...

Cyberbullying Is Now A Punishable Crime In Michigan

Beginning in March 2019, cyberbullying will now be illegal in the state of Michigan. The House Bill 5017 now makes cyberbullying a punishable crime by Michigan law, meaning that those who harass others online could face potential jail...

The Difference Between Theft, Robbery and Burglary

Often, burglary, robbery, and theft are used interchangeably even though there are distinct differences between all of them. Though, what all three do have in common is they may involve the unlawful taking of someone’s personal property by...

Do I Have To Go To Court If I Get A Divorce?

If you’re contemplating a divorce in Michigan, you probably have a lot of questions. One of the most intimidating aspects of getting a divorce in Michigan or anywhere else is the idea of having to appear in court. The laws for getting a...

Do I Need A Prenuptial Agreement?

A prenuptial agreement is not only for the wealthy people in society, like Hollywood celebrities and the like but also for any couple that brings personal assets, property, debts or children from a former relationship into the marriage. This...

PROBATE 19: Respondent argues she did not receive notice of hearing until five days before.

Respondent argues that she was denied her right to due process of law because she did not receive notice of the hearing until five days before it took place. Respondent argues that the five-day notice of hearing violated her right to due process. Due process generally requires that notice be reasonably calculated to apprise interested parties of the action and to provide them an opportunity to be heard.

WILLS/TRUSTS 11: Allegations that a trustee violated his fiduciary duties.

MCL 700.7803 states that a trustee shall act as would a prudent person in dealing with the property of another, including following the standards of the Michigan prudent investor rule. If the trustee has special skills or is named trustee on the basis of representation of special skills or expertise, the trustee is under a duty to use those skills. MCL 700.7810 states that a trustee shall take reasonable steps to take control of and protect the trust property.

How Is Probation Violated?

If you are on probation, it means you have the judge's trust and have been allowed some level of freedom. Now you must work on ensuring you don’t violate your probation. You will need to abide by every term that the criminal court judge...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000