Now Accepting New Clients!

CRIMINAL 18: Defendant was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm.

This case stems from an interaction between defendant and police officers, which resulted in a police officer chasing defendant on foot.

The chase spanned two to three blocks. During the chase, defendant ran between neighboring houses. Officer Oliver observed defendant throw a gun over a fence while running between houses. Shortly after Officer Oliver saw defendant throw a gun, the foot chase ended, and defendant was taken into custody. Police officers searched the yard that defendant threw the gun into and recovered a pistol.

Felon in Possession of Firearm

Defendant was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Defendant claimed there was insufficient evidence to support that he possessed the firearm.

Circumstantial evidence and the reasonable inferences that arise from the evidence can constitute satisfactory proof of the elements of the crime.

On the issue of whether defendant possessed a firearm, Officer testified that while he was chasing defendant, he saw defendant throw a gun over a backyard fence. Another officer testified that he found a gun in a backyard near the location where he was told defendant had thrown a gun. When viewing this evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant possessed the firearm that was recovered by police.

Court Determines Credibility of Officer Testimony

Defendant argues that Officer testimony was not corroborated by the footage from the officer’s body camera, and that the prosecution did not present any fingerprint or DNA evidence connecting defendant to the gun. But it is for the trier of fact to determine the credibility of Officer testimony and the weight to give the evidence presented at trial.

Facing Criminal Charges

When you are facing criminal charges, no matter how seemingly minor, it is important to quickly secure effective legal representation.

As a client of Aldrich Legal Services, you will benefit from working with Michigan criminal lawyers who have defended thousands of clients facing criminal charges.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Speak to a Pro: (734) 404-3000

What to Do When Homeowners Insurance Denies Your Claim

Since 1955, homeowners insurance has helped owners protect their property and belongings against damages and theft. According to the Insurance Information Institute, over 93% of homeowners in the US have homeowners insurance coverage, paying around...

What to Look for in a Criminal Defense Attorney

Originally posted on 10/20/2017 If you are charged with a crime, you could face severe penalties that could include financial fines, public service, or even jail time. For those in the Michigan area, hiring an attorney experienced in...

PROBATE 51: Trust filed a petition to determine title to credit union account.

The probate court explained that the owners of the account are S and J. When S passes, J becomes the owner of the account. J is the one who had the authority to make the designation. Nowhere in any documents is there a designation by J that SJ be the owner -- or the beneficiary of the account. The designation made by his father was no longer binding because he was no longer the owner at the time J passed away.

Invoking Your Right to Remain Silent

Originally posted on 07/19/2017 While the “right to remain silent” represents one of your most inalienable rights, many people have a few misconceptions about how it works. Many people receive their understanding of this...

Arrests made by tracking cell phones may be illegal

Originally posted on 02/10/2017 Law enforcement agencies are always looking for an edge in fighting crime. As cell phones have become an indispensable part of life for many people, authorities have taken to using these devices to track...

Could I lose my job over a drunk driving arrest?

Originally posted on 01/20/2017 When potential clients ask us questions about criminal defense representation (particularly for drunk driving offenses) one of the most common is whether they will lose their job.  Naturally, this...

FAMILY LAW 77: Court awarded plaintiff sole legal custody; defendant was unwilling to work with plaintiff.

For joint custody to work, parents must be able to agree with each other on basic issues in child rearing including health care, religion, education, day to day decision making and discipline and they must be willing to cooperate with each other in joint decision making. If two equally capable parents are unable to cooperate and to agree generally concerning important decisions affecting the welfare of their children, the court has no alternative but to determine which parent shall have sole custody of the children.

CRIMINAL 19: Sentencing guidelines are advisory.

The sentencing guidelines are advisory, and although a trial court must determine the applicable guidelines range and take it into account when imposing a sentence, the court is not required to sentence a defendant within that range.

Basic responsibilities of an executor

Originally posted on 01/11/2017 The emotional toils of dealing with the death of a loved one can be considerably difficult. Nevertheless, perseverance is paramount; especially if you are appointed to be an executor to one’s...

What you need to compliment your will

Originally posted on 02/08/2017 Making end-of-life plans usually end with a will, but they shouldn't. Some believe that simply having a will is enough. However, this post will briefly explain how having other estate planning...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000