Now Accepting New Clients!

DIVORCE 10: Plaintiff contends that the home is not marital property, but rather separate property not subject to invasion.

Plaintiff’s father, purchased a parcel of land and Plaintiff’s father intended that plaintiff and defendant would live in the home and, upon their death, pass the property to their daughters.

Plaintiff’s father testified that, while defendant was out of work, he helped oversee construction of the house. Plaintiff’s father paid for childcare for the children while defendant worked on the property, but did not pay defendant for his work. To fund the construction, Plaintiff’s father opened a bank account in his, plaintiff’s, and defendant’s names so that everything was managed from one account. Only Plaintiff’s father deposited funds into the account.

The record indicates that construction of the home was a team effort. Defendant was apparently on site working every day and performed considerable work on the house and surrounding property. Construction on the home ended in 2012, and on October 25, 2012, Plaintiff’s father quitclaimed his interest in the property to plaintiff. In December 2012, plaintiff, defendant, and their two daughters moved into the house.

Plaintiff and defendant made accommodations and alterations to the home after moving in. Plaintiff also took out a mortgage on the home in her name, but defendant, as her husband, was required to sign the paperwork. Plaintiff used the mortgage funds to pay for work on the house, outstanding bills for materials, and to pay off vehicle loans for her and defendant. During the marriage, the parties pooled their monies and used their joint resources to pay all the bills; both were in charge of finances. However, when plaintiff lost her job in 2014, defendant became employed to support the family. Although plaintiff became reemployed within a month and again began contributing to the mortgage payments and family bills, defendant continued depositing his paychecks into their joint account, made mortgage payments, and paid the bills for the next six months. Plaintiff filed for divorce on January 27, 2015.

At trial, plaintiff requested that the trial court award her the home, whereas defendant requested 50% of the home’s equity. The trial court concluded that the home was marital property subject to division because defendant contributed to the marital home by working on it; plaintiff and defendant lived together in the home for two years; and defendant paid for the expenses of the home for six months. The court found that the parties comingled funds to build and maintain the home. The court further concluded that, even if the home was to be considered separate property, it would be subject to invasion because defendant extensively improved the property.

Are you facing a divorce in Michigan? Do you have questions about how your assets and your debts will be divided with your soon-to-be ex-spouse? Financial issues are often the biggest concern for individuals and families who are facing divorce.

At the Plymouth and Ann Arbor law firm of Aldrich Legal Services, our attorneys understand the struggles you may face. We will work hard to help you obtain all to which you are entitled during your divorce.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

FSBO: 3 Tips to Help Effectively Sell Your Home

Many homeowners are taking real estate matters into their own hands, especially when it comes to their own homes. Some of the most difficult tasks FSBO sellers encounter are selling their home at the right price, understanding paperwork and selling...

How Is Debt Split Up In A Divorce?

For some, debt is inevitable. Many individuals have some form of debt whether it’s credit card debt or student loans. You and your spouse may have accumulated debt over the years and this raises a huge question. How is debt split up in a...

What Are Some Post Legal Divorce Issues?

Once a divorce is finalized, there still may be a few legal issues that can happen after the divorce proceeding. It’s even possible that new issues can arise after the divorce. In either event, a divorce lawyer can help guide you through these...

For Sale by Owner: Do You Need an Attorney?

  For sale by owner (FSBO) homes can be a daunting task. However, if you want to do it correctly and smoothly, it’s best done with some assistance from a real estate lawyer. A real estate attorney has the knowledge and experience to...

Michigan Marijuana Statutes

In the state of Michigan, the possession of marijuana is illegal unless you have a medical condition that is debilitating. Below we discuss the marijuana statutes in Michigan. Medical Marijuana The Michigan Medical Marijuana Act states that...

The Most Common Reasons for Real Estate Litigation

Real estate litigation can happen to anyone, from buyers and sellers to real estate agents, there’s always a potential for a lawsuit. With a lot of money on the line, it’s crucial to have an experienced attorney who has a great...

Refusing A Blood Alcohol Test in Michigan

In the state of Michigan, the law requires you to take either a blood, breath or urine test if arrested for an OWI. Michigan has an “implied consent” law which states that if someone lawfully arrested by an officer who has probable cause...

Do Background Checks Show Misdemeanors?

  Misdemeanors are often considered a less serious criminal offense compared to their felony counterpart. Common misdemeanors include reckless driving, petty theft, public intoxication, trespassing and more. Although misdemeanors don’t...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000