734-359-7018
Now Accepting New Clients!
Blog

DIVORCE 14: A temporary order remains in effect until modified or until the entry of the final judgment of divorce.

In this case, the facts of the divorce are relatively straightforward. Plaintiff and defendant married in June 2007, shortly after which defendant gave birth to the couple’s child. Both parties testified at trial to a marriage characterized by mutual physical and verbal abuse, and each party testified that the other spent too much money on his or her respective vice. Plaintiff filed for divorce in August 2014; at the time, he was 56 years old and defendant was 48 years old. The following month, the trial court entered an order requiring plaintiff to pay for the marital home mortgage, taxes and utilities, his car note, and credit card indebtedness, and defendant to pay for her car note, child care costs and her individual needs; the parties were to share the cost of groceries.

Plaintiff and defendant continued to live in their house until December 2014, when plaintiff moved out following a domestic violence incident. In response to defendant’s motions for temporary support, the trial court entered an order in March 2015 requiring plaintiff to pay defendant $1,100 a month.

Plaintiff raises some issues with regard to spousal support.

Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in extending the status quo beyond entry of the JOD. Pursuant to MCR 3.207(C)(5), a temporary order remains in effect until modified or until the entry of the final judgment or order.  Prior to entry of the final version of the JOD, defendant filed a motion asking the trial court, among other things, to continue the temporary support order until sale of the marital house and to delay the onset of plaintiff’s child and spousal support obligations accordingly. The trial court granted defendant’s motion and incorporated this request into the JOD. Thus, the JOD either modified the temporary support order by extending it until the closing on the sale of the marital home and delaying the onset of plaintiff’s support obligations accordingly.

Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in denying his request for 14 months’ credit against his spousal support obligation, arguing that the court should not penalize him for defendant’s role in extending the proceedings beyond what was reasonably necessary by bringing a third party into the suit on baseless fraud and conspiracy claims. We agree that defendant played no small part in extending the divorce proceedings. However, the argument overlooks plaintiff’s role in expanding the scope, duration, and expense of the trial by claiming that he and defendant owed the third party $300,000 pursuant to a promissory note that clearly obligated plaintiff alone.

Are you facing a divorce in Michigan? Do you have questions about how your assets and your debts will be divided with your soon-to-be ex-spouse?

At the Plymouth and Ann Arbor law firm of Aldrich Legal Services, our attorneys understand the struggles you may face. We will work hard to help you obtain all to which you are entitled during your divorce.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Three reasons to put a power of attorney in place

Originally posted on 11/08/2016 While no one wants to think of the unfortunate possibility of being incapacitated or of a time when we can't handle our own affairs, this circumstance is a real possibility. If something happens and this...

How to approach parents about estate planning

Originally posted on 12/09/2016 Family forms a strong foundation for many people's first and most intimate community. It is important to strengthen these first relationships so even uncommon questions become natural. For those...

PROBATE 44: Petition for Mental Health Treatment

Michigan’s Mental Health Code governs the civil admission and discharge procedures for a person with a mental illness. Specifically, MCL 330.1434 sets forth the procedure and content requirements for a petition for mental health treatment.

Should you get your criminal record expunged?

Originally posted on 04/12/2017 If you have been convicted of a crime, have served your sentence, and have followed all court recommendations, you should be able to put your past behind you and move on with life. Moving forward is critical...

Choosing the right executor for an estate

Originally posted on 05/28/2017 When people are thinking about planning their estate, they often think about trying to minimize the estate tax, keeping their will updated, and keeping items out of probate court; however, there is another...

Understanding how the Miranda warning works

Originally posted on 11/25/2016 Michigan residents who have seen television police shows or movies involving law enforcement have no doubt watched many dramatic scenes with officers quoting something to the effect of, "You have the...

PROBATE 42: Dissolution of professional corporation.

This case involves the estate of a doctor whose professional corporation also had to be dissolved upon his death. The personal representative of the estate sold the company’s assets but did not pay off the company’s debts before transferring the proceeds to the estate and distributing them to the heirs.

A basic introduction to wills

Originally posted on 10/31/2016 It can be difficult to consider the end of our lives when we are in good health. However, lives can change at any moment, so it is wise to be prepared for any situation that may arise. Despite the many...

REAL ESTATE 73: Quiet title action.

This case involves a dispute over real property located in Michigan. W and V who are D’s parents, acquired the property. In 1999, W and V conveyed the property to the Trust, to which W is the sole trustee, via a quit claim deed. At some point...

How Is Alimony Determined In A Michigan Divorce?

Originally posted on 06/22/2018. When filing for divorce in Michigan, you may seek alimony, spousal support, from their spouse whenever they require financial aid. A judge may order your spouse to pay certain alimony. However, it depends...

Is My Conviction Eligible for Expungement?

Originally posted on 10/11/2019. At one point or another, we have all made mistakes. For some people, those mistakes involved breaking the law. Convictions have a large impact on someone’s life. Beyond the sentencing ranging from...

PROBATE 45: The court held that the probate court did not err by granting summary disposition for Plaintiff, or by denying Defendant’s request for an extension of the discovery period, adjournment of mediation, and issuance of subpoenas and by dismi

This case arises out of competing petitions for probate. On November 19, 2018, Defendant initiated this case by filing a petition for probate, attaching Decedent’s death certificate and purported last will and testament, dated March 9, 2007,...

DIVORCE 57: Holding that the trial court’s factual findings were not supported by the record evidence, and thus could not stand, the court reversed, vacated the portion of the Amended Default JOD ordering defendant to pay $3,325 to plaintiff, and re

Plaintiff first testified that she and defendant purchased the marital home in 1995. At the time the first default judgment of divorce was entered in September 2017, plaintiff had the home appraised. The value of the home was determined to be...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
consultation
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000
734-237-6482
734-366-4405