734-359-7018
Now Accepting New Clients!
Blog

DIVORCE 37: Defendant argues distribution of pension plan inequitable.

In this case, plaintiff and defendant were married for more than 19 years before filing for divorce. The parties reached a settlement agreement to all aspects of their divorce, apart from distributing plaintiff’s and defendant’s pension.

Defendant’s plan, unlike plaintiff’s plan, included a 3% cost-of-living adjustment, which meant that defendant’s monthly pension amount would gradually increase each year. Second, defendant’s plan permitted plaintiff as alternate payee to receive benefits before defendant retired. However, defendant could not receive pension benefits under plaintiff’s plan until she retired. Plaintiff is eligible to retire when she is 60 years old, and defendant is eligible to retire when he is 48 years old.

Pension Benefits are a Part of Marital Estate

Rights to vested pension benefits accrued by a party during the marriage are considered part of the marital estate subject to award upon divorce.

The two pension plans, which are both marital assets, should be applied evenly to the parties. The parties were each entitled to half of the pension funds. The trial court concluded that a 50/50 distribution method should be applied.

Pension Distribution Method

Defendant argued to apply a proposed offset method instead of the 50/50 distribution method.  If defendant chose to retire in three years at age 48, it wouldn’t be equitable if he had to wait until plaintiff decided to retire in order to collect on her pension.

Defendant explained that rather than dividing both pensions in half and giving each party a right to 50% of the other party’s pension, applying an offset method, whereby plaintiff would keep her full pension and receive a smaller portion of defendant’s pension. The parties’ monthly pensions were similar in amounts, so he calculated a monthly base amount by combining both parties’ monthly pensions and dividing it by two. Because defendant’s monthly pension amount would be slightly higher, in order to ensure both parties received an equal monthly amount, plaintiff would receive an additional portion of defendant’s pension per month.

Defendant testified that the offset method would be the most equitable under the circumstances because plaintiff could keep her entire pension while still being able to receive a portion of defendant’s pension to ensure that the total value of the pensions was distributed evenly, and defendant could elect to retire early and receive a full monthly pension payment rather than receiving only half of his payment until plaintiff could retire 12 years later.

Court Declines Offset Method

The trial court declined to apply the proposed offset method and instead concluded that a 50/50 distribution method should be applied. The court explained that if plaintiff elected to receive her half of defendant’s pension before she retired, and if defendant retired before plaintiff, it may reduce defendant’s pension to the extent that he could not survive on his pension payment alone. However, the court also stated that there were circumstances in which the offset method would be inequitable to plaintiff, and noted that plaintiff’s right to her 50% of the pension plans need not be encumbered by the possibility of defendant’s anticipated retirement and unilateral decision not to seek further employment.

Most Equitable Method for Division

The court considered the value of both pensions, the contribution of the parties, as well as the fairness of distributing the property in a manner that would allow the parties equal access to their share of the property, irrespective of any indefinite future actions taken by the parties.

The trial court concluded that awarding 50% of each party’s pension was the most equitable method for division and entered a judgment of divorce providing that plaintiff would receive 50% of defendant’s pension, through an Eligible Domestic Relations Order (EDRO). The trial court also ordered that defendant receive 50% of plaintiff’s pension, through a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO).

Experienced Guidance with Property Division During Divorce

Are you facing a divorce in Michigan? Do you have questions about how your assets and your debts will be divided with your soon-to-be ex-spouse?

Financial issues are often the biggest concern for individuals and families who are facing divorce.

At the Plymouth and Ann Arbor law firm of Aldrich Legal Services, our attorneys understand the struggles you may face. We will work hard to help you obtain all to which you are entitled during your divorce.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Three reasons to put a power of attorney in place

Originally posted on 11/08/2016 While no one wants to think of the unfortunate possibility of being incapacitated or of a time when we can't handle our own affairs, this circumstance is a real possibility. If something happens and this...

How to approach parents about estate planning

Originally posted on 12/09/2016 Family forms a strong foundation for many people's first and most intimate community. It is important to strengthen these first relationships so even uncommon questions become natural. For those...

PROBATE 44: Petition for Mental Health Treatment

Michigan’s Mental Health Code governs the civil admission and discharge procedures for a person with a mental illness. Specifically, MCL 330.1434 sets forth the procedure and content requirements for a petition for mental health treatment.

Should you get your criminal record expunged?

Originally posted on 04/12/2017 If you have been convicted of a crime, have served your sentence, and have followed all court recommendations, you should be able to put your past behind you and move on with life. Moving forward is critical...

Choosing the right executor for an estate

Originally posted on 05/28/2017 When people are thinking about planning their estate, they often think about trying to minimize the estate tax, keeping their will updated, and keeping items out of probate court; however, there is another...

Understanding how the Miranda warning works

Originally posted on 11/25/2016 Michigan residents who have seen television police shows or movies involving law enforcement have no doubt watched many dramatic scenes with officers quoting something to the effect of, "You have the...

PROBATE 42: Dissolution of professional corporation.

This case involves the estate of a doctor whose professional corporation also had to be dissolved upon his death. The personal representative of the estate sold the company’s assets but did not pay off the company’s debts before transferring the proceeds to the estate and distributing them to the heirs.

A basic introduction to wills

Originally posted on 10/31/2016 It can be difficult to consider the end of our lives when we are in good health. However, lives can change at any moment, so it is wise to be prepared for any situation that may arise. Despite the many...

REAL ESTATE 73: Quiet title action.

This case involves a dispute over real property located in Michigan. W and V who are D’s parents, acquired the property. In 1999, W and V conveyed the property to the Trust, to which W is the sole trustee, via a quit claim deed. At some point...

How Is Alimony Determined In A Michigan Divorce?

Originally posted on 06/22/2018. When filing for divorce in Michigan, you may seek alimony, spousal support, from their spouse whenever they require financial aid. A judge may order your spouse to pay certain alimony. However, it depends...

Is My Conviction Eligible for Expungement?

Originally posted on 10/11/2019. At one point or another, we have all made mistakes. For some people, those mistakes involved breaking the law. Convictions have a large impact on someone’s life. Beyond the sentencing ranging from...

PROBATE 45: The court held that the probate court did not err by granting summary disposition for Plaintiff, or by denying Defendant’s request for an extension of the discovery period, adjournment of mediation, and issuance of subpoenas and by dismi

This case arises out of competing petitions for probate. On November 19, 2018, Defendant initiated this case by filing a petition for probate, attaching Decedent’s death certificate and purported last will and testament, dated March 9, 2007,...

DIVORCE 57: Holding that the trial court’s factual findings were not supported by the record evidence, and thus could not stand, the court reversed, vacated the portion of the Amended Default JOD ordering defendant to pay $3,325 to plaintiff, and re

Plaintiff first testified that she and defendant purchased the marital home in 1995. At the time the first default judgment of divorce was entered in September 2017, plaintiff had the home appraised. The value of the home was determined to be...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
consultation
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000
734-237-6482
734-366-4405