Now Accepting New Clients!

DIVORCE 8: Separate assets may lose their character as separate property.

A trial court’s first consideration when dividing property in divorce proceedings is the determination of marital and separate assets.  The categorization of property as marital or separate, however, is not always easily achieved, because there are occasions when property earned or acquired during the marriage may be deemed separate property.

The fact that an asset is obtained as a separate asset does not mean its status cannot change.  Separate assets may lose their character as separate property and transform into marital property.  If separate assets are commingled with marital assets and treated by the parties as marital property they may change to marital property.

In this case, the parties married in 1995 and had three children. Plaintiff first filed for divorce in 2009. At that time, defendant began living with his parents while plaintiff remained in the parties’ former marital home with the children. While the initial divorce action was pending, plaintiff’s father became ill and was hospitalized. During that time, defendant approached plaintiff about reconciling. Plaintiff’s father died in February 2010 and in March 2010, plaintiff dismissed the initial divorce action.

Plaintiff’s father left plaintiff and her two siblings, jointly, a piece of property. The property consisted of an uninhabited residence, a pole barn, and several buildings in various states of disrepair, and approximately 40 acres of land.  Plaintiff negotiated with her siblings for their interests in the inherited property. After the negotiations with plaintiff’s siblings were completed, the full title to the property was transferred to plaintiff in 2012. Plaintiff financed this buyout with a loan from defendant’s parents on which she was the sole borrower. Payments were made on this loan while the parties were still married.

The parties sold their former marital home in late 2012. They used some of the proceeds from the sale to make improvements to the farmhouse and the rest was used for household maintenance during the renovations. About one year after moving into the renovated farmhouse, plaintiff refiled for divorce. The parties settled many of the issues but went to trial regarding defendant’s entitlement, if any, to the property that plaintiff and her siblings inherited.

The fact that an asset is obtained as a separate asset does not mean its status cannot change. Property received by a married person as an inheritance, but kept separate from marital property, is deemed to be separate property not subject to distribution. The mere fact that property may be held jointly or individually is not necessarily dispositive of whether the property is classified as separate or marital. The actions and course of conduct taken by the parties are the clearest indication of whether property is treated or considered as marital.

Plaintiff inherited a one-third interest in the property. The other two-thirds, though part of her father’s estate, was not bequeathed to her but to her siblings, and each of those shares were obtained during the marriage.  Although plaintiff testified that she refused defendant’s request to add his name to the title in 2013 and the title to the property remained in plaintiff’s name alone, it is not dispositive of whether the property is her separate property. Rather, the court looks to the parties’ actions and conduct.

The home on the property was completely rehabilitated, improved, and updated using funds from the sale of the prior marital home. Further, defendant did the lion’s share of the work himself and received no payment. In sum the court concluded that the two-thirds interest obtained from plaintiff’s siblings was marital property and that the loan was a marital debt.

Are you facing a divorce in Michigan? Do you have questions about how your assets and your debts will be divided with your soon-to-be ex-spouse?  Financial issues are often the biggest concern for individuals and families who are facing divorce.

At the Plymouth and Ann Arbor law firm of Aldrich Legal Services, our attorneys understand the struggles you may face. We will work hard to help you obtain all to which you are entitled during your divorce.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Three reasons to put a power of attorney in place

Originally posted on 11/08/2016 While no one wants to think of the unfortunate possibility of being incapacitated or of a time when we can't handle our own affairs, this circumstance is a real possibility. If something happens and this...

How to approach parents about estate planning

Originally posted on 12/09/2016 Family forms a strong foundation for many people's first and most intimate community. It is important to strengthen these first relationships so even uncommon questions become natural. For those...

PROBATE 44: Petition for Mental Health Treatment

Michigan’s Mental Health Code governs the civil admission and discharge procedures for a person with a mental illness. Specifically, MCL 330.1434 sets forth the procedure and content requirements for a petition for mental health treatment.

Should you get your criminal record expunged?

Originally posted on 04/12/2017 If you have been convicted of a crime, have served your sentence, and have followed all court recommendations, you should be able to put your past behind you and move on with life. Moving forward is critical...

Choosing the right executor for an estate

Originally posted on 05/28/2017 When people are thinking about planning their estate, they often think about trying to minimize the estate tax, keeping their will updated, and keeping items out of probate court; however, there is another...

Understanding how the Miranda warning works

Originally posted on 11/25/2016 Michigan residents who have seen television police shows or movies involving law enforcement have no doubt watched many dramatic scenes with officers quoting something to the effect of, "You have the...

PROBATE 42: Dissolution of professional corporation.

This case involves the estate of a doctor whose professional corporation also had to be dissolved upon his death. The personal representative of the estate sold the company’s assets but did not pay off the company’s debts before transferring the proceeds to the estate and distributing them to the heirs.

A basic introduction to wills

Originally posted on 10/31/2016 It can be difficult to consider the end of our lives when we are in good health. However, lives can change at any moment, so it is wise to be prepared for any situation that may arise. Despite the many...

REAL ESTATE 73: Quiet title action.

This case involves a dispute over real property located in Michigan. W and V who are D’s parents, acquired the property. In 1999, W and V conveyed the property to the Trust, to which W is the sole trustee, via a quit claim deed. At some point...

How Is Alimony Determined In A Michigan Divorce?

Originally posted on 06/22/2018. When filing for divorce in Michigan, you may seek alimony, spousal support, from their spouse whenever they require financial aid. A judge may order your spouse to pay certain alimony. However, it depends...

Is My Conviction Eligible for Expungement?

Originally posted on 10/11/2019. At one point or another, we have all made mistakes. For some people, those mistakes involved breaking the law. Convictions have a large impact on someone’s life. Beyond the sentencing ranging from...

PROBATE 45: The court held that the probate court did not err by granting summary disposition for Plaintiff, or by denying Defendant’s request for an extension of the discovery period, adjournment of mediation, and issuance of subpoenas and by dismi

This case arises out of competing petitions for probate. On November 19, 2018, Defendant initiated this case by filing a petition for probate, attaching Decedent’s death certificate and purported last will and testament, dated March 9, 2007,...

DIVORCE 57: Holding that the trial court’s factual findings were not supported by the record evidence, and thus could not stand, the court reversed, vacated the portion of the Amended Default JOD ordering defendant to pay $3,325 to plaintiff, and re

Plaintiff first testified that she and defendant purchased the marital home in 1995. At the time the first default judgment of divorce was entered in September 2017, plaintiff had the home appraised. The value of the home was determined to be...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000