Now Accepting New Clients!

DIVORCE 9: Both businesses awarded to husband in the divorce.

In this case, the parties divorced after 31 years of marriage. The defendant, 60 years old at the time of trial, worked as a self-employed painter and DJ. Plaintiff, 55 years old at the time of trial, was employed part-time, working 20 to 24 hours a week as a daycare worker at $9 an hour; she had worked part-time throughout the marriage while raising the parties’ children. In light of the disparity in the parties’ incomes, the trial court awarded spousal support to plaintiff.

Defendant pays plaintiff periodic spousal support subject to modification in the amount of $600.00 per month for 7 years or until plaintiff’s remarriage or death, whichever occurs first.  The spousal support is also preserved for plaintiff to insure payment of debt and obligations assigned to the defendant. The trial court awarded the marital home to defendant but ordered that he pay plaintiff her half of the net equity. The parties had owned two empty parcels of land, and the court awarded one parcel to plaintiff and one to defendant.

Plaintiff argues that failing to place a value on defendant’s two businesses and awarding them to defendant, is depriving plaintiff of assets to which she is entitled.

Defendant stated that he operated the painting business in cash and that he has minimal equipment for the business.  With regard to the DJ business, defendant stated that he had one guy that will cover for him and minimal DJ equipment. Both parties acknowledged that both of the businesses (painter and DJ) are operated on a cash basis and the value is essentially the labor provided by defendant. Although there was some testimony that plaintiff assisted at times with the businesses, the court found that the DJ business and the painting business, was, for the most part, dependent on the labor of defendant.

The trial court did not find the businesses “valueless” but instead, that they were dependent on defendant’s goodwill and labor and that the business and the necessary equipment should therefore be awarded to defendant, so he could continue to carry out his job. Accordingly, the decision of the court was that both businesses and the equipment needed to carry out the functions of the businesses be awarded to the defendant.

Are you facing a divorce in Michigan? Do you have questions about how your assets be divided?

In Michigan, marital assets are divided equitably during the divorce process, but this does not mean that the property division will be equal.

Aldrich Legal Services family law practice is headed by Brad Aldrich, a knowledgeable divorce lawyer with more than 19 years of legal experience. To schedule a free consultation with an experienced divorce lawyer at our firm, contact our Michigan law office.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Three reasons to put a power of attorney in place

Originally posted on 11/08/2016 While no one wants to think of the unfortunate possibility of being incapacitated or of a time when we can't handle our own affairs, this circumstance is a real possibility. If something happens and this...

How to approach parents about estate planning

Originally posted on 12/09/2016 Family forms a strong foundation for many people's first and most intimate community. It is important to strengthen these first relationships so even uncommon questions become natural. For those...

PROBATE 44: Petition for Mental Health Treatment

Michigan’s Mental Health Code governs the civil admission and discharge procedures for a person with a mental illness. Specifically, MCL 330.1434 sets forth the procedure and content requirements for a petition for mental health treatment.

Should you get your criminal record expunged?

Originally posted on 04/12/2017 If you have been convicted of a crime, have served your sentence, and have followed all court recommendations, you should be able to put your past behind you and move on with life. Moving forward is critical...

Choosing the right executor for an estate

Originally posted on 05/28/2017 When people are thinking about planning their estate, they often think about trying to minimize the estate tax, keeping their will updated, and keeping items out of probate court; however, there is another...

Understanding how the Miranda warning works

Originally posted on 11/25/2016 Michigan residents who have seen television police shows or movies involving law enforcement have no doubt watched many dramatic scenes with officers quoting something to the effect of, "You have the...

PROBATE 42: Dissolution of professional corporation.

This case involves the estate of a doctor whose professional corporation also had to be dissolved upon his death. The personal representative of the estate sold the company’s assets but did not pay off the company’s debts before transferring the proceeds to the estate and distributing them to the heirs.

A basic introduction to wills

Originally posted on 10/31/2016 It can be difficult to consider the end of our lives when we are in good health. However, lives can change at any moment, so it is wise to be prepared for any situation that may arise. Despite the many...

REAL ESTATE 73: Quiet title action.

This case involves a dispute over real property located in Michigan. W and V who are D’s parents, acquired the property. In 1999, W and V conveyed the property to the Trust, to which W is the sole trustee, via a quit claim deed. At some point...

How Is Alimony Determined In A Michigan Divorce?

Originally posted on 06/22/2018. When filing for divorce in Michigan, you may seek alimony, spousal support, from their spouse whenever they require financial aid. A judge may order your spouse to pay certain alimony. However, it depends...

Is My Conviction Eligible for Expungement?

Originally posted on 10/11/2019. At one point or another, we have all made mistakes. For some people, those mistakes involved breaking the law. Convictions have a large impact on someone’s life. Beyond the sentencing ranging from...

PROBATE 45: The court held that the probate court did not err by granting summary disposition for Plaintiff, or by denying Defendant’s request for an extension of the discovery period, adjournment of mediation, and issuance of subpoenas and by dismi

This case arises out of competing petitions for probate. On November 19, 2018, Defendant initiated this case by filing a petition for probate, attaching Decedent’s death certificate and purported last will and testament, dated March 9, 2007,...

DIVORCE 57: Holding that the trial court’s factual findings were not supported by the record evidence, and thus could not stand, the court reversed, vacated the portion of the Amended Default JOD ordering defendant to pay $3,325 to plaintiff, and re

Plaintiff first testified that she and defendant purchased the marital home in 1995. At the time the first default judgment of divorce was entered in September 2017, plaintiff had the home appraised. The value of the home was determined to be...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000