Now Accepting New Clients!

FAMILY LAW 35: Trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for a change of domicile.

This case arises out of plaintiff’s request to move the parties’ children from Michigan to Louisiana. The parties were married, and they had three children together during the marriage. The judgment of divorce stated that both parties shared joint legal and joint physical custody of the children. The judgment further provided that the father would have parenting time three weekends a month. In the summer, father would have parenting time 14 days a month.

Plaintiff, acting in propria persona, filed a motion to change the children’s domicile. She explained that she wished to move to Louisiana with her husband and the three children because she was given the opportunity for good employment and adequate housing for the entire family. Plaintiff asserted that the move would be good for education because Louisiana had great school districts. Defendant opposed the motion.

After holding a hearing in which both plaintiff and defendant testified, the trial court granted plaintiff’s motion.

A motion for a change of domicile essentially requires a four-step approach.

  • First, a trial court must determine whether the moving party has established by a preponderance of the evidence that the factors enumerated in MCL 722.31(4), support a motion for a change of domicile.
  • Second, if the factors support a change in domicile, then the trial court must then determine whether an established custodial environment exists.
  • Third, if an established custodial environment exists, the trial court must then determine whether the change of domicile would modify or alter that established custodial environment.
  • Finally, if, and only if, the trial court finds that a change of domicile would modify or alter the child’s established custodial environment must the trial court determine whether the change in domicile would be in the child’s best interests by considering whether the best-interest factors in MCL 722.23 have been established by clear and convincing evidence.

In this case, the trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for a change of domicile and memorialized this decision in its order regarding change of domicile, dated November 28, 2018. The court found the requested change of domicile will not change the children’s established custodial environment. Additionally, at the January 8, 2019 hearing, the trial court discusses the established custodial environment, and father’s counsel acknowledges that the established custodial environment is with the mother.

The trial court found that the current parenting-time agreement was loosely complied with, but the trial court did not believe that plaintiff had a secret motive to keep the children from defendant. This finding is also supported by plaintiff’s testimony because she offered defendant parenting time for the entire summer and on alternate holidays. She also offered to meet defendant halfway for parenting-time exchanges. Plaintiff stated that she believed that this arrangement would be an improvement to the current practice because defendant often worked on the weekends in which he had the children.

If you are going through a divorce or are separating from the mother or father of your children, it is important to protect your custodial rights.

If the divorce or separation process does not turn out like you thought it would, you may not have the custody, visitation or child support you deserve.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

FAMILY LAW 50: A Michigan Court has jurisdiction to make an initial custody determination when it is the home state of the child on the date of the commencement of the proceeding or within 6 months before the commencement of the proceeding.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY  Plaintiff and defendant have twin sons, but never married.  On August 13, 2008, the Court of Common Pleas Juvenile Division in Montgomery County, Ohio established plaintiff as the legal father of the children and...

When You Should Contest a Will?

Wills usually go through without a problem. Well over 90% of wills have no issue making it through probate. However, there are several grounds you may have to contest a will. As a beneficiary, or someone who would gain from a will, there are legal...

What You Need to Know About Distracted Driving

A great U.S. freedom is the ability to drive the open roads. However, every year there are more than 20,000 car accidents in Michigan. Many of these accidents come from distracted driving and could have been avoided. Distracted driving is such a...

Reasons Your Will or Trust Could be Contested

Everyone reacts in their own way when a family member passes away. Emotions can run high, and people can react more strongly than they normally would. Some family members may feel cheated by what a will or trust grants them leading them to contest...

Penalties For Driving Without Insurance in Michigan

Getting into a car and going for a drive isn’t perfectly safe. Driving on the Michigan roads can be dangerous. Driving those same roads becomes financially dangerous if you drive without car insurance. Between fees, charges, and possible...

PROBATE 36: Undue influence to execute Lady Bird deed.

This probate dispute between siblings arises out of the death of their father. Their father lived alone. In 2013, however, he asked appellee to live with him. She agreed, moving into the home in August 2013. Appellants allege that in the years...

Top 5 Most Common Traffic Violations in Michigan

Staying safe on the roads is in everyone’s best interest. However, keeping yourself or others out of danger is everyone’s responsibility. Getting a traffic ticket ends up costing drivers big time. Traffic tickets and citations cost money...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000