Now Accepting New Clients!

FAMILY LAW 71: Custody Dispute - Willingness to facilitate a close and continuing parent-child relationship.

The parties were married in 2005. JB was born during the marriage. JB has special needs, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiance disorder, and mild cognitive impairment. In 2018, plaintiff filed a complaint for divorce that sought joint legal and physical custody of JB.

Defendant answered and agreed to joint legal custody but requested sole physical custody.

The trial court entered an order at the outset of the litigation granting the parties equal parenting time pending the determination of custody.

Personal Protection Order

In September 2018, defendant alleged that plaintiff entered her residence without her permission and refused to leave and took and used her cellular phone without her permission to send photographs and text messages to people. Defendant obtained a personal protection order because of this incident, and plaintiff was also criminally charged, ultimately pleading guilty to unauthorized access of defendant’s cellular phone.

On October 30, 2019, a consent judgment of divorce was entered that left unresolved the issues of custody and parenting time. By the time of the custody hearings, defendant was living in Southgate, while plaintiff continued residing in the former marital home in Adrian. A central dispute between the parties was where JB would continue to attend High School.

Custody Hearing

At the conclusion of the custody hearings, the trial court determined that JB’s established custodial environment was with defendant alone. The trial court then analyzed the best-interest factors set forth in MCL 722.23 and granted sole legal custody of JB to defendant, with the parties having joint physical custody.

The trial court ordered that defendant was to have most of the parenting time during the school year, with JB transferring to the new high school. Plaintiff was to have the bulk of the parenting time during the summer, as well as ample parenting time for holidays.

Established Custodial Environment

In determining the existence of an established custodial environment, the focus is on the care of the child during the period preceding the custody trial. A custodial environment can be established as a result of a temporary custody order, in violation of a custody order, or in the absence of a custody order.

The trial court found that the established custodial environment weighs in favor of defendant. The trial court noted that it had considered the parties’ testimony at the custody hearings and the camera interview with JB, and that defendant had historically been much more involved in caring for JB than plaintiff.

Best Interest Factors

Factor (j) is the willingness and ability of each party to facilitate and encourage a close and continuing parent-child relationship between the child and the other parent. MCL 722.23(j). The trial court found that this factor favored defendant, and that plaintiff was not willing or able to facilitate and encourage a close and continuing relationship between JB and defendant.

Factor (k) is domestic violence, regardless of whether the violence was directed against or witnessed by the child. MCL 722.23(k). With respect to this factor, the trial court noted testimony by defendant that there was domestic violence against her and JB.

Assisting Parents with Custody Matters

At Aldrich Legal Services, our attorneys and staff understand the stress that can come with family law disputes. Our firm is committed to helping you find resolutions to all your family law needs, allowing you to move on with your life in a positive way.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Speak to a Pro: (734) 404-3000

FAMILY LAW 77: Court awarded plaintiff sole legal custody; defendant was unwilling to work with plaintiff.

For joint custody to work, parents must be able to agree with each other on basic issues in child rearing including health care, religion, education, day to day decision making and discipline and they must be willing to cooperate with each other in joint decision making. If two equally capable parents are unable to cooperate and to agree generally concerning important decisions affecting the welfare of their children, the court has no alternative but to determine which parent shall have sole custody of the children.

CRIMINAL 19: Sentencing guidelines are advisory.

The sentencing guidelines are advisory, and although a trial court must determine the applicable guidelines range and take it into account when imposing a sentence, the court is not required to sentence a defendant within that range.

Basic responsibilities of an executor

Originally posted on 01/11/2017 The emotional toils of dealing with the death of a loved one can be considerably difficult. Nevertheless, perseverance is paramount; especially if you are appointed to be an executor to one’s...

What you need to compliment your will

Originally posted on 02/08/2017 Making end-of-life plans usually end with a will, but they shouldn't. Some believe that simply having a will is enough. However, this post will briefly explain how having other estate planning...

The benefits of home health care providers

Originally posted on 03/22/2017 As we get older or suffer an injury, we need a little extra help. Home health care providers or caregivers can provide the assistance needed to handle your or your loved one's health and safety...

What to know about bail conditions

Originally posted on 03/06/2017 If you have been arrested and are being held on the suspicion that you have committed a particular crime, chances are that the only thing you are thinking about is getting out of jail as soon as possible and...

College students and estate planning

Originally posted on 12/16/2016 With college semesters starting up in Michigan, it may not be so easy to get college students to think responsibly. This time can be especially tough with the need of moving back to school and getting...

Three reasons to put a power of attorney in place

Originally posted on 11/08/2016 While no one wants to think of the unfortunate possibility of being incapacitated or of a time when we can't handle our own affairs, this circumstance is a real possibility. If something happens and this...

How to approach parents about estate planning

Originally posted on 12/09/2016 Family forms a strong foundation for many people's first and most intimate community. It is important to strengthen these first relationships so even uncommon questions become natural. For those...

PROBATE 44: Petition for Mental Health Treatment

Michigan’s Mental Health Code governs the civil admission and discharge procedures for a person with a mental illness. Specifically, MCL 330.1434 sets forth the procedure and content requirements for a petition for mental health treatment.

Should you get your criminal record expunged?

Originally posted on 04/12/2017 If you have been convicted of a crime, have served your sentence, and have followed all court recommendations, you should be able to put your past behind you and move on with life. Moving forward is critical...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000