Now Accepting New Clients!

REAL ESTATE 71: The court held that defendant was violating the township zoning ordinance by operating a tourist home and thus, plaintiff were entitled to summary disposition of their nuisance per se claim.


Plaintiffs’ suit primarily alleges that defendant is conducting rental activity on its property in violation of the Manchester Township Zoning Ordinance (MTZO). Plaintiffs requested an order enjoining defendant from operating a resort on its property. In October 2018, plaintiffs moved for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) (no genuine issue of material fact) on their claim of nuisance per se. After a second motion hearing, the trial court again took the motion under advisement, and later entered an order denying plaintiffs’ motion for summary disposition and granting summary disposition to defendant on plaintiffs’ claim of nuisance per se. The order provided in pertinent part: The Court finds that the rental of the said dwelling from time to time, for determinable periods of time, to one [1] single family, whether it is or not the same or a different family, is a permitted use under said Ordinance because that Ordinance does not require occupancy by a family for any stated or limited period of time. Therefore, the rental to different families from time to time is not prohibited by said Ordinance. The trial court denied plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration.


Plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred by denying their motion for summary disposition of the nuisance-per-se claim. We agree. A use of land or a dwelling, building, or structure in violation of a zoning ordinance is a nuisance per se. MCL 125.3407. A zoning ordinance is interpreted in accordance with the rules of statutory interpretation. When construing the provisions of a zoning ordinance, this Court seeks to discover and give effect to the legislative intent.  We review de novo a trial court’s decision on a motion for summary disposition. Under the MTZO, a single-family dwelling is a permitted use in the AR District. The parties disagree whether the house on Ashkay Island, because it is rented out by defendant only to individual families, constitutes a single-family dwelling.  We need not resolve the parties’ competing interpretations of what constitutes a single-family dwelling, however, because we agree with the Township that defendant’s use of the house meets the definition a “tourist home,” which is not permitted in the AR District. Tourist homes are permitted only in the Community Commercial Center Zoning District (CC District). The house on Ashkay Island is a dwelling that is being rented overnight to transient guests for compensation. Therefore, Defendant  is using the house as a tourist home. Section 4.03A of the MTZO provides that “[u]ses shall be permitted [in a District] only if they are specifically listed herein.” Because tourist homes are permitted only in the CC District, they are necessarily prohibited in the other districts, including the AR District where Ashkay Island is located. Therefore, defendant is violating the MTZO by operating a tourist home in the AR District. Plaintiffs are entitled to summary disposition of their nuisance-per-se claim. 


Are you involved in a real estate dispute in Michigan? Are you seeking resolution to a property litigation matter?

If you are facing a residential or commercial real estate issue, seek the advice of an experienced and skilled real estate litigation attorney at Aldrich Legal Services.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Speak to a Pro: (734) 404-3000

Three reasons to put a power of attorney in place

Originally posted on 11/08/2016 While no one wants to think of the unfortunate possibility of being incapacitated or of a time when we can't handle our own affairs, this circumstance is a real possibility. If something happens and this...

How to approach parents about estate planning

Originally posted on 12/09/2016 Family forms a strong foundation for many people's first and most intimate community. It is important to strengthen these first relationships so even uncommon questions become natural. For those...

PROBATE 44: Petition for Mental Health Treatment

Michigan’s Mental Health Code governs the civil admission and discharge procedures for a person with a mental illness. Specifically, MCL 330.1434 sets forth the procedure and content requirements for a petition for mental health treatment.

Should you get your criminal record expunged?

Originally posted on 04/12/2017 If you have been convicted of a crime, have served your sentence, and have followed all court recommendations, you should be able to put your past behind you and move on with life. Moving forward is critical...

Choosing the right executor for an estate

Originally posted on 05/28/2017 When people are thinking about planning their estate, they often think about trying to minimize the estate tax, keeping their will updated, and keeping items out of probate court; however, there is another...

Understanding how the Miranda warning works

Originally posted on 11/25/2016 Michigan residents who have seen television police shows or movies involving law enforcement have no doubt watched many dramatic scenes with officers quoting something to the effect of, "You have the...

PROBATE 42: Dissolution of professional corporation.

This case involves the estate of a doctor whose professional corporation also had to be dissolved upon his death. The personal representative of the estate sold the company’s assets but did not pay off the company’s debts before transferring the proceeds to the estate and distributing them to the heirs.

A basic introduction to wills

Originally posted on 10/31/2016 It can be difficult to consider the end of our lives when we are in good health. However, lives can change at any moment, so it is wise to be prepared for any situation that may arise. Despite the many...

REAL ESTATE 73: Quiet title action.

This case involves a dispute over real property located in Michigan. W and V who are D’s parents, acquired the property. In 1999, W and V conveyed the property to the Trust, to which W is the sole trustee, via a quit claim deed. At some point...

How Is Alimony Determined In A Michigan Divorce?

Originally posted on 06/22/2018. When filing for divorce in Michigan, you may seek alimony, spousal support, from their spouse whenever they require financial aid. A judge may order your spouse to pay certain alimony. However, it depends...

Is My Conviction Eligible for Expungement?

Originally posted on 10/11/2019. At one point or another, we have all made mistakes. For some people, those mistakes involved breaking the law. Convictions have a large impact on someone’s life. Beyond the sentencing ranging from...

PROBATE 45: The court held that the probate court did not err by granting summary disposition for Plaintiff, or by denying Defendant’s request for an extension of the discovery period, adjournment of mediation, and issuance of subpoenas and by dismi

This case arises out of competing petitions for probate. On November 19, 2018, Defendant initiated this case by filing a petition for probate, attaching Decedent’s death certificate and purported last will and testament, dated March 9, 2007,...

DIVORCE 57: Holding that the trial court’s factual findings were not supported by the record evidence, and thus could not stand, the court reversed, vacated the portion of the Amended Default JOD ordering defendant to pay $3,325 to plaintiff, and re

Plaintiff first testified that she and defendant purchased the marital home in 1995. At the time the first default judgment of divorce was entered in September 2017, plaintiff had the home appraised. The value of the home was determined to be...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000