Now Accepting New Clients!

How to Choose a Criminal Defense Lawyer for a DUI

A criminal defense attorney discusses a case with their client.No one wants to be arrested, and if you are, especially for the first time, you can be very confused. Being arrested for Drunk Driving, Driving Under the Influence (DUI) or Operating While Intoxicated (OWI) - formerly Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) -  in Michigan can be stressful and scary. Some of the consequences of being convicted, even a first offense of DUI or OWI for alcohol, marijuana, or any other intoxicant, are severe. Some of the possible sentences include fines, court costs, suspension of your license, jail time, and more. 

The seriousness of the consequences for a DUI or OWI means having an experienced attorney to represent your rights is necessary. Finding the right lawyer who is knowledgeable and can give you helpful advice can be difficult.

Follow our guide below on some of the top qualities to look for in an attorney to represent you during your legal proceedings.

Relevant Experience 

Experience presents a huge divide between those attorneys who can help you and those who can’t. Studying and defending clients who have been arrested with OWI and DUI charges will make a difference in your case. Understanding the legal process by having gone through it makes future cases go more smoothly.

Knowledge of OWI and DUI Legal Standings

Experience and legal knowledge tend to go hand-in-hand. There are many challenges your lawyer can make in your legal proceedings including during the arrest. An attorney with the important legal understanding will be able to tap into the Fourth Amendment, touching on search and seizure procedures, checkpoints, illegitimate breathalyzer use, and more. 

Legal Record and Performance

Look to the wins to see what an attorney can win. There is something to be said for lawyers who defend “the undefendable.” However, a lawyer’s win record, especially of OWI or DUI cases, is telling for how your case will go. Look for the dismissal rates. Consider using the websites Avvo.com and Martindale.com to research a lawyer’s performance.

Ratings from Peers and Clients

Ratings can tell you the real story. Explore an attorney’s testimonial page or read their google reviews to get an idea about client’s experience working with them. Additionally, attorneys collaborate on many cases and projects. Check the links above for Avvo or Martindale to explore how attorneys rate each other. An attorney giving a high rating to a professional peer can say a lot about them. 

Finding the Right OWI or DUI Lawyer to Defend Your Rights

There are many factors that go into making a good candidate for your OWI or DUI defense. Looking at their performance and ratings can help give you insight into how it will be to work with them. The attorneys at Aldrich Legal Services have been defending clients in Plymouth, Ann Arbor, and the surrounding areas for more than 21 years. We have helped our clients get the best results during their OWI and DUI legal proceedings. If you have been arrested with these or other criminal charges, give our team a call today. 

REAL ESTATE 65: Determining that it could not conclude the trial court erred in its factual findings, and that it did not err in reforming a 2005 deed, the court affirmed the ruling that defendants were fee simple owners of the disputed 50-foot area

This case arose from a real-property dispute between brothers, as well as their respective wives. After a bench trial, the trial court rendered its findings of fact. The trial court determined that plaintiffs did not prove that excluding the...

FAMILY LAW 58: The trial court did not err by denying defendant-father’s motion to change custody and modify his parenting time of the parties’ child without having an evidentiary hearing to determine if there was proper cause or a change in circums

This case arose from a custody and parenting-time dispute between plaintiff-mother and father over their minor child. After father failed to respond to the paternity complaint within the 21 days of receipt of the complaint, mother filed an affidavit...

DIVORCE 53: Although the court affirmed the trial court’s decisions to deny defendant’s motions to set aside the default and the default JOD, it vacated the portions of the default JOD as to the distribution of marital property, custody, parenting t

Plaintiff filed for divorce. Defendant filed an answer and a counterclaim for divorce.  Plaintiff and defendant were both ordered to appear at the settlement conference. After defendant failed to appear, the trial court entered a default. Soon...

FAMILY LAW 53: The trial court erred by treating the parties’ GAL as an LGAL and denying the parties the right to question her at a hearing; however, the trial court did not err in requiring the parties to compensate the GAL for her services.

Plaintiff and Defendant were never married, but share a young son who was born in 2016. The parties have battled over custody, child support, and other parenting issues ever since. In the spring of 2019, the parties filed competing motions to modify...

The Difference Between Theft, Robbery, and Burglary

Original Post: 1/11/2019 Often, burglary, robbery, and theft are used interchangeably even though there are distinct differences between all of them. Though, what all three do have in common is they may involve the unlawful taking of...

REAL ESTATE 59: Concluding that the one-year period contained in the parties’ home purchase agreement was not a statute of limitations, but rather akin to a statute of repose, and that it was plain and unambiguous, the court held that it barred plai

BACKGROUND On March 12, 2016, the parties entered into an agreement for the purchase of defendants’ home. The purchase agreement contained the following clause: TIME FOR LEGAL ACTION: Buyer and Seller agree that any legal action against...

CRIMINAL LAW 16: The trial court did not err in refusing to order a Daubert hearing as to the reliability of the DataMaster breathalyzer device as MCL 257.625a(6)(a) shows the Legislature has determined that the device’s results are valid and reliabl

UNDERLYING FACTS In the early afternoon of November 4, 2016, defendant was pulled over after an officer was dispatched for a possible drunk driver. The officer had defendant exit his vehicle and perform several field sobriety tests. Those tests...

FAMILY LAW 52: Defendant-mother was not entitled to relief on her claim the trial court did not comply with the requirements for a de novo hear, the trial court did not err in using the preponderance of the evidence standard, and its best interest f

PERTINENT FACTS In July 2017, plaintiff and defendant divorced by consent judgment. Under the judgment of divorce, the parties shared joint legal and physical custody of their three minor children. On September 24, 2018, plaintiff filed a motion...

Are you required to provide ID as a passenger?

Original Post: 05/14/2017 The preceding is for informational purposes only. Being stopped by the police is not usually a pleasant experience. Even with the most benign of infractions, the encounter can be adversarial. The idea of...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000