734-359-7018
Now Accepting New Clients!
Blog

CRIMINAL LAW 7: Was initial contact with defendant a Terry stop?


Original Post: 03/12/2018

 

An officer searches a suspect using the terry stop or stop and frisk policy.When is an interaction with an officer questionable?

There are some approaches officers are allowed to take when approaching a citizen. In this case, the officer in question may have used a terry stop to make initial contact with the defendant. Keep reading to learn more about the case and more about Terry Stops. 

What is a Terry Stop or Stop and Frisk Technique?

If you haven't heard of a Terry Stop, maybe you have heard of the more common "stop and frisk" policy. Don't worry, they are the same policy. Under this ruling, an officer who has "reasonable suspicion" that someone is a criminal, they can search them. 

Example of a Case Involving a Terry Stop

The police officer was patrolling an industrial part of the town in an unmarked vehicle on a dirt road when he observed defendant’s vehicle, driving 25 to 30 miles below the speed limit, turning into a closed landscaping business. Officer called for backup, and approximately 10 minutes later, a uniformed officer arrived in a marked police car. The two officers entered the landscaping business and found defendant standing outside his vehicle in the parking lot. As the officers approached, defendant told them that they were on private property, that he was an employee of the business, and asked them to leave.

When the officers approached defendant, he showed them an identification card indicating that he was an employee of the business, and explained that he was picking up some equipment for the morning. However, while engaging in this interaction, Officer noticed that defendant was speaking slowly, almost slurring his words, and was visibly shaking. The officer concluded that defendant was under the influence of drugs or alcohol. After defendant failed several of the standard sobriety tests, he was placed under arrest for impaired driving. His car was searched thereafter, and approximately 12 hydrocodone tablets were found in a prescription bottle in defendant’s vehicle.

Defendant was ultimately charged with operating a vehicle while intoxicated, possession of a controlled substance, and operating a vehicle on a suspended or revoked license. Defendant then moved to suppress all evidence stemming from his arrest on the grounds that the evidence was obtained during an unconstitutional search and seizure.

The fact that the officers subjected defendant to a Terry stop does not automatically lead to the conclusion that the stop violated the Fourth Amendment.  Whether an officer has a reasonable suspicion to make such an investigatory stop is determined case by case, on the basis of an analysis of the totality of the facts and circumstances.

The prosecution points to the following facts in order to demonstrate reasonable suspicion.  First, that this was a “directed patrol” and that there had recently been burglaries in the area. Second, that defendant was driving unusually slowly on an empty, unlit dirt road at about 12:30 a.m. Third, that defendant entered a business that was closed and did so at a time during which it was very unlikely that business would be conducted and remained there for over 10 minutes, which was when the police entered.

The court concluded that given the facts of this case, driving unusually slowly in an isolated area and then entering into a closed and gated business in the early morning hours was sufficient to reasonably suspect that defendant might be engaged in criminal activity and to conduct a brief investigatory stop.

Get Experienced Legal Defense for Your OWI Charge

There is no denying that Michigan has harsh punishments for operating a vehicle while intoxicated; jail, probation, and license suspension are all possible. You can find the strong advocate you require at Aldrich Legal Services, in Plymouth, Michigan. If you are facing operating while intoxicated (OWI) charges as an adult or as a minor, we can fight on your behalf quickly and effectively.

Michigan Expungement Law Updates For 2021

There has been a new laws regarding expungements for the state of Michigan.  Gov. Gretchen Whitmer signed legislation that expands the criteria for expungements related to traffic offenses, marijuana convictions, and minor...

Wills and Trusts

Originally posted on: 02/14/2014 Aldrich Legal Service provides legal advice and representation for residents in Plymouth, Ann Arbor, and Southeast Michigan. We also review recent legal cases to examine what took place and what we can...

REAL ESTATE 68: Holding that plaintiffs-buyers’ allegations of fraud in this case arising from the sale of a residence did not preclude the trial court from granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition based on a release, the court affirmed.

This cause of action arises from plaintiffs’ purchase of a residence from defendant, who had rights in the house under a land contract from co-defendant, the legal owner of the house. Before the house was for sale, in January 2018, an upstairs...

REAL ESTATE 65: Determining that it could not conclude the trial court erred in its factual findings, and that it did not err in reforming a 2005 deed, the court affirmed the ruling that defendants were fee simple owners of the disputed 50-foot area

This case arose from a real-property dispute between brothers, as well as their respective wives. After a bench trial, the trial court rendered its findings of fact. The trial court determined that plaintiffs did not prove that excluding the...

FAMILY LAW 58: The trial court did not err by denying defendant-father’s motion to change custody and modify his parenting time of the parties’ child without having an evidentiary hearing to determine if there was proper cause or a change in circums

This case arose from a custody and parenting-time dispute between plaintiff-mother and father over their minor child. After father failed to respond to the paternity complaint within the 21 days of receipt of the complaint, mother filed an affidavit...

DIVORCE 53: Although the court affirmed the trial court’s decisions to deny defendant’s motions to set aside the default and the default JOD, it vacated the portions of the default JOD as to the distribution of marital property, custody, parenting t

Plaintiff filed for divorce. Defendant filed an answer and a counterclaim for divorce.  Plaintiff and defendant were both ordered to appear at the settlement conference. After defendant failed to appear, the trial court entered a default. Soon...

FAMILY LAW 53: The trial court erred by treating the parties’ GAL as an LGAL and denying the parties the right to question her at a hearing; however, the trial court did not err in requiring the parties to compensate the GAL for her services.

Plaintiff and Defendant were never married, but share a young son who was born in 2016. The parties have battled over custody, child support, and other parenting issues ever since. In the spring of 2019, the parties filed competing motions to modify...

The Difference Between Theft, Robbery, and Burglary

Original Post: 1/11/2019 Often, burglary, robbery, and theft are used interchangeably even though there are distinct differences between all of them. Though, what all three do have in common is they may involve the unlawful taking of...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
consultation
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000
734-237-6482
734-366-4405