Now Accepting New Clients!

Holding that the respondent-mother failed to establish that she was entitled to appellate relief, the court affirmed termination of her parental rights to the children.

Respondent contended that the trial court erred by receiving the expert testimony of Dr. C, because the DHHS failed to specifically designate her as an expert on its witness list. She also asserted that C's testimony did not satisfy the requirements of MRE 702, and that C was improperly allowed to offer an opinion on an ultimate issue here. Respondent did not satisfy the plain error standard because she has "not shown that any of the alleged errors affected the outcome of the proceedings." Contrary to her contention, the record offered no indication that the trial court relied heavily on the testimony provided by C. Most of C's "testimony pertained to the medical condition of one of respondent's children shortly after removal, and thus bore little relation to the grounds for termination under" §§ (c)(i) or (g). Although C's opinion that the "children would be at risk if returned to respondent directly implicated" § (j), the record did "not suggest that the court relied more than incidentally on" C's opinion when reaching its conclusion on that factor. The only time the trial court specifically mentioned C's testimony was when summarizing all the testimony presented in the case. It never cited C's testimony "when articulating its findings under any of the statutory termination factors." In fact, C "never testified in connection with the most important reasons behind the decision to terminate parental rights, which included housing, income, domestic violence, and lack of benefit from services." Further, the only time the trial court referred to C's "testimony while discoursing upon the children's best interests was a brief reference to their health abnormalities when removed from respondent's care." In sum, the record indicated that the trial court did not rely more than marginally on C's testimony in deciding the case. Thus, respondent "failed to show that she suffered sufficient prejudice to justify reversal in connection with any of her claims of error relating" to C's participation in the proceedings. 

Basic responsibilities of an executor

Originally posted on 01/11/2017 The emotional toils of dealing with the death of a loved one can be considerably difficult. Nevertheless, perseverance is paramount; especially if you are appointed to be an executor to one’s...

What you need to compliment your will

Originally posted on 02/08/2017 Making end-of-life plans usually end with a will, but they shouldn't. Some believe that simply having a will is enough. However, this post will briefly explain how having other estate planning...

The benefits of home health care providers

Originally posted on 03/22/2017 As we get older or suffer an injury, we need a little extra help. Home health care providers or caregivers can provide the assistance needed to handle your or your loved one's health and safety...

What to know about bail conditions

Originally posted on 03/06/2017 If you have been arrested and are being held on the suspicion that you have committed a particular crime, chances are that the only thing you are thinking about is getting out of jail as soon as possible and...

College students and estate planning

Originally posted on 12/16/2016 With college semesters starting up in Michigan, it may not be so easy to get college students to think responsibly. This time can be especially tough with the need of moving back to school and getting...

Three reasons to put a power of attorney in place

Originally posted on 11/08/2016 While no one wants to think of the unfortunate possibility of being incapacitated or of a time when we can't handle our own affairs, this circumstance is a real possibility. If something happens and this...

How to approach parents about estate planning

Originally posted on 12/09/2016 Family forms a strong foundation for many people's first and most intimate community. It is important to strengthen these first relationships so even uncommon questions become natural. For those...

PROBATE 44: Petition for Mental Health Treatment

Michigan’s Mental Health Code governs the civil admission and discharge procedures for a person with a mental illness. Specifically, MCL 330.1434 sets forth the procedure and content requirements for a petition for mental health treatment.

Should you get your criminal record expunged?

Originally posted on 04/12/2017 If you have been convicted of a crime, have served your sentence, and have followed all court recommendations, you should be able to put your past behind you and move on with life. Moving forward is critical...

Choosing the right executor for an estate

Originally posted on 05/28/2017 When people are thinking about planning their estate, they often think about trying to minimize the estate tax, keeping their will updated, and keeping items out of probate court; however, there is another...

Understanding how the Miranda warning works

Originally posted on 11/25/2016 Michigan residents who have seen television police shows or movies involving law enforcement have no doubt watched many dramatic scenes with officers quoting something to the effect of, "You have the...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000