734-359-7018
Now Accepting New Clients!
Blog

New Vaping Ban in Michigan Impacts Businesses and Residents


A crowd is blurred out with a hand in the foreground holding a sign crossing out the word Major changes could be coming to smokers in Michigan in the months to come. On Wednesday, September 4, Governor Whitmer declared a ban on flavored e-cigarettes. Her announcement came out based on the state health department finding youth vaping constituted a public health emergency. 

New Ruling from the Governor’s Office

The Michigan ban will impact both in-store and online sales all e-cigarette flavors except tobacco. The ban will go into effect in the next few weeks. Expect the ban to last for about six months, and then the governor can renew the ban for an extra six months. 
 
During the ban, the health department will work to develop permanent regulations banning flavored e-cigarettes. Working through the legal process, the Michigan legislature could put forth a block on these rules. If a legislative block comes through, it could face a veto. 

Increased Use in School-Aged Kids 

One of the biggest pushes for the proposed ban of flavored e-cigarette use is the product's impact on minors. 
 
Governor Whitmer made a statement expressing, “As governor, my number one priority is keeping our kids safe...companies selling vaping products are using candy flavors to hook children on nicotine.”
 
The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS) recently reported some alarming numbers for e-cigarette usage among teens. According to their 2018 survey, high school students using e-cigarettes went from 11.7 to 20.8 percent, increasing 78 percent between the years 2017 and 2018. In the same period, use among middle school students increased by 48 percent. Usage is defined as one time in the past 30 days.
 
According to the National Institute of Drug Abuse, e-cigarette use is more popular with young people than traditional cigarette use. Going by the numbers of cigarette and e-cigarette use: 8th-grade users were 3.6 vs. 9.5 percent, 10th-grade users were 6.3 vs. 14 percent, and 12-grade users were 11.4 vs. 16.2 percent.

Impact on Community Health 

Aside from youth use of e-cigarettes, there is also cause for concern in general use no matter the age of vaping individual. As of September 12, 2019, six deaths have been linked to vaping and e-cigarette use according to CNN
 
Vaping has often been marketed as an aid for people who wish to stop smoking. According to the Hopkins medical website, e-cigarettes have not been approved by the FDA as a cessation tool (something to help a person stop). In fact, most traditional smokers end up smoking and vaping.
 
The governor pointed to this flawed marketing for vaping as another reason for the ban. Her statement included the following, “...misleading claims to promote the belief that these products are safe. That ends today...These bold steps will finally put an end to these irresponsible and deceptive practices and protect Michiganders’ public health.” The governor’s office pointed out the use of the words "clear," "safe," or "healthy" to describe their products is particularly misleading.
 
Michigan already has a ban on sales of e-cigarettes to minors. Read more on the status of minors charged with a misdemeanor for vaping in our past blog post. Aldrich Legal Services continues to stay up on the most recent legal developments that impact Michigan youth. If you would like to learn more about how to legally protect you or a family member, give us a call today at (734) 404-3000.

FAMILY LAW 41: To minimize disruptive changes in children’s custody, moving party must establish cause or a change of circumstance.

To minimize unwarranted and disruptive changes in children’s custody, a trial court may only modify children’s custody if the moving party first establishes a proper cause or a change of circumstances. The purpose of this framework is to erect a barrier against removal of a child from an established custodial environment and to minimize unwarranted and disruptive changes of custody orders.

DIVORCE 35: Proceeds received by one spouse in a personal injury lawsuit are generally considered separate property.

Proceeds received by one spouse in a personal injury lawsuit meant to compensate for pain and suffering, as opposed to lost wages, are generally considered separate property. Moreover, separate assets may lose their character as separate property and transform into marital property if they are commingled with marital assets and treated by the parties as marital property.

4 Common Real Estate Disputes to Watch Out For

Creating a mutually beneficial real estate deal usually goes through smoothly with both sides presenting their interests then negotiating toward a middle ground they can both agree to uphold. Unfortunately, not all deals go through without an issue....

REAL ESTATE 44: Rule of acquiescence in boundary disputes.

The doctrine of acquiescence provides that, where adjoining property owners acquiesce to a boundary line for a period of at least fifteen years, that line becomes the actual boundary line. The underlying reason for the rule of acquiescence is the promotion of peaceful resolution of boundary disputes.

FAMILY LAW 37: Referee recommended against changing legal custody or parenting time.

Plaintiff requested sole legal custody, arguing that she and defendant had difficulty co-parenting and that defendant would not agree to medical treatment for the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD, need for orthodontic work, and need for vision testing and glasses. Plaintiff also requested an alternating weekly or biweekly schedule during the summer, which would increase her overall parenting time.

REAL ESTATE 40: Tax Tribunal denied petitioner’s claim of a principal residence exemption (PRE).

MCL 211.7cc(2) provides that an owner of property can claim the PRE by filing an affidavit that must state that the property is owned and occupied as a principal residence by that owner of the property on the date that the affidavit is signed and shall state that the owner has not claimed a substantially similar exemption, deduction, or credit on property in another state.

The Steps of Construction Litigation

Most contracting agreements move forward without any problems, but when disputes between contracting parties come up, it can be confusing to understand the legal process to take. The legal experts at Aldrich Legal Services want to make the...

REAL ESTATE 38: Plaintiff fails to make land contract payments.

The land contract stated that T Company sold real property to plaintiff. The land contract further stated that if plaintiff failed to make a monthly payment, T Company could execute the quitclaim deed, thereby terminating plaintiff’s rights to the real property under the land contract.

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
consultation
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000
734-237-6482
734-366-4405