Now Accepting New Clients!
Blog

Top 3 Misconceptions on Power of Attorney


Considering leaving the country for a long time while maintaining a business or selling a home in the US? Were you recently diagnosed with a terminal or degenerative disease?

For these and many other issues, it may become necessary for someone to appoint a power of attorney. A power of attorney (POA) grants an agent or attorney-in-fact person or organization to have the authority to manage one's affairs, healthcare, or finances if they cannot. Granting someone a power of attorney can be a temporary or long-term arrangement.

There are many reasons to set up a POA. Unfortunately, there are many misunderstandings about POA. Below are the most common misconceptions we encounter about POAs.

Misconception #1: There is Only One Type of Power of Attorney

POAs can assist people in various ways. An experienced attorney can help establish the correct POA for someone’s unique needs. There are two main types of POAs:

  • General Power of Attorney - This type of POA offers all power managing a principal’s assets.
  • Special or Limited Power of Attorney - This type of POA offers focused authority. For example, a limited POA may allow an agent to conduct an auto sale of one vehicle.

Misconception #2: A Power of Attorney Will Survive Death

Every type of POA ends the moment the beneficiary dies. Instead, the last will decides who will manage the person’s estate.

Most types of POA end when the principal person dies or becomes incapacitated. If the person becomes mentally incompetent, their standard will ends.

Yet, if the principal individual established a durable POA, this agreement will extend until death, even if the person becomes mentally incompetent.

Misconception #3: The Power of Attorney Can Do Whatever They Want

Granting a POA may seem like an individual gives up all rights they have to an external power who could then serve their selfish interests. But, an agent has a fiduciary obligation - or a necessity to act with the principal person’s best interests in mind.

The fiduciary obligation may not be in the document, but it does not need to be in the document for it to be legally binding.

Even though this responsibility to act in a principal person’s best interest is a big part of the POA, it is crucial that a beneficiary chooses someone they trust.

Get the Help You Need

The above are the most common misconceptions related to power of attorney laws. The attorneys at Aldrich Legal Services have experience helping clients navigate the complexity of power of attorney laws. If you have other questions about power of attorney or would like to discuss if establishing a power of attorney is right for you or someone you know, reach out to us today at (734) 404-3000.

 

Are Juvenile Records Public or Can They be Expunged?

There is something in most people’s life they regret - if they could redo a moment, they would have done it better. Although there is no physical way to erase the past or redo past wrongs, there is a legal way to prevent some of the crimes...

FAMILY LAW 42: Motion to modify custody denied due to lack of supporting affidavits or documentation.

The lack of substantiation, again and again, could reasonably call into question plaintiff’s motives and credibility on all matters. The trial court appeared more than open to further considering a motion to modify custody if plaintiff would come forward with supporting documentary evidence, explaining why the court took the unusual step of denying the motion without prejudice.

WILLS/TRUSTS 21: Plaintiff alleged the University failed to use the funds consistent with the terms of the trust.

On April 23, 2018, plaintiff filed suit, alleging (1) breach of contract, namely the University’s failure to use the funds consistent with the terms of the Gift Agreement, and seeking damages or specific performance; (2) breach of fiduciary duty, on account of the University’s failure, as trustee of the charitable trust established by Professor’s gift, to comply with the terms and conditions of the resulting charitable trust; (3) violation of the Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act, MCL 451.921 et seq.; and (4) the need for injunctive relief prohibiting the dissipation of funds during the pendency of the case.

What is Collaborative Divorce Family Law?

Coming to the end of a happy time is a challenge no one wants to deal with in life. The end of a marriage through a divorce can especially be a tough, emotional, and complicated period. Lawyers and judges deciding your future, remembering important...

FAMILY LAW 41: To minimize disruptive changes in children’s custody, moving party must establish cause or a change of circumstance.

To minimize unwarranted and disruptive changes in children’s custody, a trial court may only modify children’s custody if the moving party first establishes a proper cause or a change of circumstances. The purpose of this framework is to erect a barrier against removal of a child from an established custodial environment and to minimize unwarranted and disruptive changes of custody orders.

DIVORCE 35: Proceeds received by one spouse in a personal injury lawsuit are generally considered separate property.

Proceeds received by one spouse in a personal injury lawsuit meant to compensate for pain and suffering, as opposed to lost wages, are generally considered separate property. Moreover, separate assets may lose their character as separate property and transform into marital property if they are commingled with marital assets and treated by the parties as marital property.

4 Common Real Estate Disputes to Watch Out For

Creating a mutually beneficial real estate deal usually goes through smoothly with both sides presenting their interests then negotiating toward a middle ground they can both agree to uphold. Unfortunately, not all deals go through without an issue....

Is My Conviction Eligible for Expungement?

At one point or another, we have all made mistakes. For some people, those mistakes involved breaking the law. Convictions have a large impact on someone’s life. Beyond the sentencing ranging from community service to fines, to jail or prison...

REAL ESTATE 44: Rule of acquiescence in boundary disputes.

The doctrine of acquiescence provides that, where adjoining property owners acquiesce to a boundary line for a period of at least fifteen years, that line becomes the actual boundary line. The underlying reason for the rule of acquiescence is the promotion of peaceful resolution of boundary disputes.

FAMILY LAW 37: Referee recommended against changing legal custody or parenting time.

Plaintiff requested sole legal custody, arguing that she and defendant had difficulty co-parenting and that defendant would not agree to medical treatment for the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD, need for orthodontic work, and need for vision testing and glasses. Plaintiff also requested an alternating weekly or biweekly schedule during the summer, which would increase her overall parenting time.

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
consultation
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000
734-237-6482
734-366-4405