Browse Our Blog for Knowledge on How to Protect Yourself Legally and to See Examples of How We've Achieved Results

The land contract stated that T Company sold real property to plaintiff. The land contract further stated that if plaintiff failed to make a monthly payment, T Company could execute the quitclaim deed, thereby terminating plaintiff’s rights to the real property under the land contract.

The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary disposition, concluding that the claims against the realty companies were barred by the valid release contained in the purchase agreement and that the claims against sellers were required to be resolved in arbitration because they fell within the scope of the arbitration clause in the purchase agreement.

As the name implies, periodic spousal support payments are made on a periodic basis. Periodic spousal support payments are subject to any contingency, such as death or remarriage of a spouse, whereas spousal support in gross is paid as a lump sum or a definite sum to be paid in installments. In addition, one major difference between the two types of spousal support is modifiability. Spousal support in gross is non-modifiable, whereas periodic spousal support is subject to modification pursuant to MCL 555.28.1.

When something drastic happens, many people need to take extra steps to rebuild your home, recover property, or pay medical bill collectors. Unfortunately, most people believe they have no backup plan if their insurance company refuses their claim...

A probate court’s consideration of the couple’s circumstances cannot involve an assumption that the institutionalized spouse should receive 100% free medical care under Medicaid or an assumption that a community spouse is entitled to maintain his or her standard of living. Medicaid is a need-based program, and a Medicaid recipient is obligated to contribute to his or her care.

When the statutory requirements for mortgage foreclosure are met, a trial court generally lacks authority to set aside a foreclosure sale except in a strong case of fraud or irregularity.

The court found the requested change of domicile will not change the children’s established custodial environment. Additionally, at the January 8, 2019 hearing, the trial court discusses the established custodial environment, and father’s counsel acknowledges that the established custodial environment is with the mother.

Michigan includes a point system as part of the enforcement process for driving. Officers assign points to a driver’s record for violations such as going through a red light, driving recklessly, or speeding. Points carry consequences for...

Respondent, now represented by counsel, filed a motion for reconsideration or relief from the probate court’s order, arguing that the order inappropriately distributed trust assets before other issues in the action were resolved, and arguing further that respondent was prejudiced by his lack of notice and inability to retain counsel before the hearing.

The trial court’s observation that defendant was able to live in the house rent-free for 14 years was an additional equitable reason for rejecting defendant’s claim that she should be awarded part of the value of the real property.

Plaintiff’s interest in the subject property is best characterized as a remainder estate, because her right to possession of the property was postponed until the occurrence of a specific contingency, that being the deaths of the grandparents. Plaintiff pursued this action within the 15-year limitation period; accordingly, this action is not barred by MCL 600.5801(4).

The fact that this agreement as to custody and parenting time did not resolve all the disputes between the parties, with the court recognizing that some other little things purportedly agreed to at mediation were going to be added to the judgment, does not render the partial agreement invalid. Plaintiff is entitled to a trial on these remaining, unresolved issues.

No matter how a divorce began or how complicated the proceedings became, couples typically emerge with a substantial agreement about finances, assets, children, living situations, and any other relevant information. These legally binding...

Accordingly, plaintiffs requested declaratory relief, allowing them to make the proposed modifications to the easement as depicted in the gravel drive improvement plan and prohibiting the defendants from interfering with their maintenance of the easement.

The trial court determined that under the UCC, the express terms of the parties’ agreements prevailed over the course of their performance and course of dealing. Although a course of performance may show that parties have waived a specific contractual term under MCL 440.1303(6), the statute does not similarly provide that a course of dealing may demonstrate waiver.

In support of the allegations, petitioner attached clinical certificates from a physician and a psychiatrist who observed respondent at the hospital. Both doctors diagnosed respondent with bipolar disorder, determined that she displayed a likelihood of injuring herself and that she did not understand the need for treatment, and recommended a course of treatment that consisted of 60 days of hospitalization and 90 days of outpatient care.

The appeals court was concerned with the trial court’s minimization of the effect of the domestic violence in the home upon the parties’ children.

Being sensitive to the fact that respondent must walk the tightrope of balancing the needs of consumer, sometimes against one another, with the limited resources that it has, MCL 330.1536 is clear that respondent cannot transfer a consumer if the transfer would be detrimental to that consumer.

The trial court then entered an order settling the consent judgment, which stated that the parties stipulated, on the record, to settle plaintiff’s inverse condemnation claim for $10,000, and that the settlement was approved by defendant’s city council.

So, you have a great idea and the experience to back it up. You are in a great starting place, but you have some work to do before jumping into forming your own business. Consider the following steps before you begin the process of starting your...

Following entry of the judgment of divorce, plaintiff filed a motion for revocation of an acknowledged father’s paternity under MCL 722.14371 of the Revocation of Paternity Act (RPA).

The fact that an irrevocable trust, which includes former assets of an institutionalized spouse, can make payments to a community spouse does not automatically render the assets held by the trust countable for the purpose of an institutionalized spouse’s initial eligibility determination.

On appeal, plaintiff argues that the trial court failed to make any findings regarding (1) the child’s established custodial environment, (2) the child’s best interests regarding the grant of primary physical custody to defendant, (3) the child’s best interests with respect to parenting time, and (4) the child’s best interests pertaining to the parties’ dispute over daycare.

the probate court determined that Daughter J had managed the estate in a manner that promoted her own interests as a beneficiary over the interests of the estate. The probate court found that such management demonstrated mismanagement of the estate and that removal of Daughter J was therefore in the best interests of the estate.

One tough break seems to lead to another. If you get behind on mortgage payments, you could be in danger of having your house foreclosed upon by the bank. Lenders foreclose on real estate to recoup their losses. But this means you won’t have a...

The statute only applies to any surplus money after satisfying the mortgage on which the real estate was sold. Therefore, for the Petitioners to be entitled to anything under MCL 600.3252, the mortgage on the Southfield property must have been satisfied and there must be surplus money remaining after the mortgage is satisfied.

An entity’s bylaws are a contractual agreement between the entity and its members. Condominium association bylaws constitute a binding contractual agreement between the governing entity and its members to the extent that the bylaws do not conflict with or are not inconsistent with state law.

Custody decisions require findings under all the best interest factors, but parenting time decisions may be made with findings on only the contested issues.

Many big decisions come with getting engaged. Planning for marriage can be exciting and romantic, although the thought of adding a prenuptial agreement may not stoke your passion, they can help you now and in the future. Prenuptial agreements are...

In deciding issues on appeal involving division of marital property, the Court first reviews the trial court’s findings of fact.

Plaintiffs requested that the trial court, either through reformation of the First Easement or interpretation of the Second Easement, quiet title in favor of plaintiffs and declare them to be the owners of an easement to access Lake Superior through the ravine on defendants’ property, enjoin defendants from interfering with their use of the easement, and order compensation for damages to the stairs.

Defendants completed the project. Plaintiff did not pay for any of the costs of the project. Defendants moved to compel plaintiff to pay one-half of the costs under the agreement. Plaintiff responded that defendants had materially breached the agreement in several ways, including by denying her the right to supervise the project, by refusing to give her an installation schedule, and by starting work before plaintiff approved of the start date.

The key difference between discretionary trusts, support trusts, and spendthrift trusts is that creditors cannot compel the trustee of a discretionary trust to pay any part of the income or principal in order that the creditors may be paid. The opposite is true of spendthrift and support trusts, which allow trust assets to be reached to satisfy creditors, including creditors seeking to satisfy claims for child support and alimony.

Families can help each other through life’s toughest moments. However, issues come up when the strain of losing a loved one combines with the stress of honoring their last wishes. Probate protects beneficiaries best interests. Though...

In May 2015, Bank A and defendant entered into an agreement (the Trial Plan), temporarily modifying the loan. Bank A agreed to not proceed with a foreclosure sale if defendant made payments of $1,382.62 for three months.

In 2016, Petitioners asserted that the mother and daughter M breached their duty of loyalty by giving son M an unequal share of property from the trust and by depleting the trust for purposes other than the mother’s care.

In order to provide security for the payment of his support obligations in the event of his death, the judgment also ordered decedent to irrevocably designate the minor children of the parties as the beneficiary on any and all life insurance policies presently outstanding upon his life, until his duty to support shall cease.

When a married couple holds real property as tenants by the entirety, neither spouse acting by themselves can alienate or encumber their interest in the property. A husband or wife must receive the consent of their spouse before conveying or encumbering an interest in the property.

Considering leaving the country for a long time while maintaining a business or selling a home in the US? Were you recently diagnosed with a terminal or degenerative disease? For these and many other issues, it may become necessary for someone...

The court ruled that title to the land prevails and that once the deed was signed, the property became the undivided whole interest for both the decedent and appellee and became appellee’s property upon the decedent’s death. Consequently, the court concluded that the prenuptial agreement did not have any impact on the property rights of appellee in this case.

The $27,000 ordered to be paid to respondents from the trusts was not a sanction, but instead was reimbursement to the trustees for expenses incurred in defending the petition. The Trust contains language providing for the reimbursement of expenses incurred by trustees in administering the trust.

The primary purpose of spousal support is to balance the parties' incomes and needs so that neither party will be impoverished, and spousal support must be based on what is just and reasonable considering the circumstances of the case.

  Marriage can end through two ways: divorce and annulment. Though both of these options have the same result, each has different requirements. There are many similarities and differences between a divorce and an annulment, so many...

The party requesting the change of domicile of the minor child has the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the change is warranted.

Despite the probate court’s order requiring Appellant to return the vehicle to R, Appellant refused to do so. Appellant’s willful noncompliance resulted in him being held in contempt of court and a sentence of four days in jail. Yet, even so, he still refused to turn the vehicle over to the personal representative.

  Vaping is a fad that is quickly solidifying into a stable industry of products around the world. Vaping and electronic cigarette (or e-cigarette) use have dramatically increased from roughly “seven million [users] in 2011 to 35...

The trial court concluded that appellant did not produce sufficient evidence to establish a genuine issue of material fact regarding decedent’s mental capacity to properly execute his 7/14 will.

The fact that plaintiff offered defendant the RFR for numerous Tuesday overnights over the course of approximately nine months does not support defendant’s position that a change of circumstances or proper cause has arisen.

The probate judge explained that he did not do his own accounting and that he would not go through all of these bills to see whether they’ve been properly accounted for.

When real property has been vacated and physical assets are left behind or abandoned on the property, one who thereafter properly enters the property and maintains possession is not liable in an action for claim and delivery under MCL 600.2920.

The court shall not modify or amend its previous judgments or orders or issue a new order so as to change the established custodial environment of a child unless there is presented clear and convincing evidence that it is in the best interest of the child.

The 2018 ballot initiative titled “the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA) passed with 56% of the vote. Michigan joins nine states and D.C. in legalizing some form of recreational marijuana use.  Due to the...

In an action arising from an alleged default by a condominium co-owner, a successful association of co-owners shall recover the costs and reasonable attorney fees associated with the action, as determined by the court, to the extent the condominium documents expressly so provide.

The trial court concluded that the agreement for a shortened period of limitations was enforceable and determined that the suit was untimely.

The probate court properly imposed a constructive trust and ordered the son to sell the mother’s home after she had deceased.

The trial court determined that the plat dedication granted an easement to use the park to all of the lot owners and did not grant riparian rights to any lot owners.

Beginning in March 2019, cyberbullying will now be illegal in the state of Michigan. The House Bill 5017 now makes cyberbullying a punishable crime by Michigan law, meaning that those who harass others online could face potential jail...

Defendant’s attorney stated that the total fees incurred by both sides are far beyond what he usually sees in divorce cases. Regarding the reasonableness of five depositions, he testified that he has not conducted five depositions in an average divorce case in the last few years.

The trial court, however, indicated its belief that it would not have jurisdiction once Mother left the state. Despite counsel’s argument regarding the utility of the Full Faith and Credit Clause, the probate court disagreed.

Defendant conveyed by quit claim deed the Property to herself and plaintiff as Joint Tenants with Full Rights of Survivorship and not as Tenants in Common. Defendant apparently took this action for purposes of estate planning.

Often, burglary, robbery, and theft are used interchangeably even though there are distinct differences between all of them. Though, what all three do have in common is they may involve the unlawful taking of someone’s personal property by...

The arbitrator stated that the award document had not included any amount for case-evaluation sanctions and that, in fact, he had not even known the results of the case evaluation until after issuance of the awards.

At that hearing, the trial court signed the proffered judgment of divorce, which it now characterized as a default judgment despite the fact that no default had been entered, nor had plaintiff ever filed a motion for entry of default judgment.

Defendant ultimately not being in full compliance did not make the filing of the motions or the signing of them by defense counsel frivolous.

If defendant was concerned about placing any limitations on the performance necessary to satisfy this obligation, he should have included that limitation in the agreement.

Plaintiff’s counsel argued that defendant had not established proper cause or a change in circumstances as required under the standards.

The Michigan statute governing spousal support favors a case-by-case approach to determining spousal support.

If you’re contemplating a divorce in Michigan, you probably have a lot of questions. One of the most intimidating aspects of getting a divorce in Michigan or anywhere else is the idea of having to appear in court. The laws for getting a...

The age of an adult is not a proper ground for disqualification under EPIC. As adults, the children are fully qualified to serve as guardians and conservators for their father. Adulthood is all that is required under EPIC.

A prenuptial agreement is not only for the wealthy people in society, like Hollywood celebrities and the like but also for any couple that brings personal assets, property, debts or children from a former relationship into the marriage. This...

An agreement to settle a pending lawsuit constitutes a contract, and therefore the agreement is governed by legal principles applicable to the interpretation and construction of contracts.

Respondent argues that she was denied her right to due process of law because she did not receive notice of the hearing until five days before it took place. Respondent argues that the five-day notice of hearing violated her right to due process. Due process generally requires that notice be reasonably calculated to apprise interested parties of the action and to provide them an opportunity to be heard.

MCL 700.7803 states that a trustee shall act as would a prudent person in dealing with the property of another, including following the standards of the Michigan prudent investor rule. If the trustee has special skills or is named trustee on the basis of representation of special skills or expertise, the trustee is under a duty to use those skills. MCL 700.7810 states that a trustee shall take reasonable steps to take control of and protect the trust property.

At issue in this case is whether Plaintiff satisfied the jurisdictional residency requirement contained in MCL 552.9(1), which provides that a judgment of divorce shall not be granted by a court in this state in an action for divorce unless the complainant or defendant has resided in this state for 180 days immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.

If you are on probation, it means you have the judge's trust and have been allowed some level of freedom. Now you must work on ensuring you don’t violate your probation. You will need to abide by every term that the criminal court judge...

The court concluded that Plaintiff did not have standing to file any pleadings in the matter because he had no legal right to be provided notice, and thus was not entitled to be a party in the case.

The trial court further awarded plaintiff attorney fees as a sanction for F Company’s filing of the motion to set aside the judgment, which it found was disingenuous.

In essence, while a bankruptcy court could discharge the debts, they still remained owing to that party to whom they were payable as support, which is not dischargeable.

On December 22, 2016, plaintiffs commenced an action to recover damages for the lost sale. They alleged breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent misrepresentation, silent fraud, entitlement to exemplary damages, and other claims.

In lieu of an answer, defendants filed a motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(8) and (C)(10), arguing essentially that plaintiff lacked standing to bring claims related to the Property because plaintiff’s legal interest in the Property was extinguished through properly conducted foreclosure proceedings and the redemption period had expired and that none of plaintiff’s claims had legal merit.

There are things that the police wouldn’t want people to know, and this is for the apparent reason that their investigations wouldn’t yield many convictions as they would like. The role of a police officer is to make arrests followed by...

Defendants’ counter-complaint sought a declaration, among other things, that defendants had acquired a legal right to use the Drive as a means to access their property. But defendants did not add the LLC, the owner of the Drive, as a party to their suit. Consequently, the trial court dismissed defendant’s counterclaim for easement rights because of the failure to join LLC—a necessary party.

With regard to defendant’s income, the trial court found that defendant earned an average of $15,300 per year from his drywall business and $120,000 per year from his medical marijuana grow operation during that same period.

The Michigan probate code states that for purposes of a statute of limitations, the proper presentation of a claim is equivalent to commencement of a proceeding on the claim.

An easement by prescription results from use of another’s property that is open, notorious, adverse, and continuous for a period of fifteen years.

An annulment officially erases a marriage. In Michigan, it is harder to get your marriage annulled than it is to get a divorce. The annulment procedure is very similar to the divorce process, and you need filing of the right documents and service...

The probate court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the petition because the situs of the trust had been transferred to Florida.

CPS informed defendant that his repeated calls and complaints against the Plaintiff-mother, in which there was not a preponderance of evidence to support the complaint, are ‘counting against him’ at this point.

Appellants argue that because they provided medical evidence and appellee did not, the trial court was bound to grant their motion. But appellants cited no legal authority that medical testimony on behalf of the non-moving party is necessary.

At arbitration, plaintiff presented a counter claim and alleged that defendant had abandoned the contract, leaving significant portions of the commercial building uncompleted, and further, refused to return to complete the work or perform corrective work.

Estate planning is a task financial experts say you should never neglect. Despite this, according to a 2017 survey, 6 in 10 Americans don't have a will. While not doing any estate planning is the biggest mistake of all, here are three...

Plaintiff brought suit, alleging that the rezoning denial deprived it of its constitutional rights to equal protection and substantive due process. The parties filed competing motions for summary disposition. The briefs largely focused on whether defendant had treated the Property differently from other properties in the downtown area and whether it had legitimate reasons for doing so.

The trial court found that both the lease and the legal description of farmland attached to the Trust Agreement are defective because the Trust never owned the property, as evidenced by the quitclaim deed and its recording in April 1998.

The Child Custody Act of 1970, MCL 722.21 authorizes a trial court to issue custody and parenting-time orders that are in the child’s best interests. A showing of proper cause or change of circumstances is required to modify a parenting-time order. The movant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that either proper cause or a change of circumstances exists.

MCL 700.7704(3) permits the probate court to appoint a successor trustee if one cannot be appointed in accordance with the trust.

Divorce comes with confusion and mixed emotions. The question of who gets custody of pets may be even more confusing- especially since pets can begin to feel like family. Courts often look out for the interest of human children and allow for shared...

To receive involuntary mental health treatment under the Mental Health Code, MCL 330.1001, a petitioner is required to establish that respondent has a mental illness and who as a result of that mental illness can reasonably be expected within the near future to intentionally or unintentionally seriously physically injure himself, herself, or another individual, and who has engaged in an act or acts or made significant threats that are substantially supportive of the expectation.

In October 2015, plaintiff began operating under his new company and filed an action for declaratory relief seeking to have the parties’ respective rights under the employment agreement clarified. Defendant filed a counter claim for damages and injunctive relief to protect Company R’s customer base.

Based on the testimony, the trial court ordered the dissolution and liquidation of the assets of the LLC. The trial court also directed the LLC to make a distribution to plaintiff, which represented the 49% share owed to him to compensate for defendant’s distribution.

When an employer terminates its pension plan, ERISA liability does not end with the company that actually promised pension payments. Instead, a trade or business under common control of the employer is treated as part of the employer and so incurs liability under ERISA.

The parties agreed that the decedent properly executed the 2005 will with his wife, but the probate court was asked to rule on whether the terms of that will made it irrevocable, which would mean that the decedent could not change his estate plan by way of the 2015 will.

It is a fundamental rule of civil procedure in this state that leave to amend pleadings should be given freely.

Some of the reasons why people tint their car windows include to enhance safety, achieve a good level of privacy and to prevent their skin from the damaging effects of UV rays. Despite these benefits, window tinting can affect a driver’s...

Despite having signed the proposed divorce judgment, defendant filed an answer to the divorce complaint on February 28, 2017, and on March 2, 2017, she filed a response to plaintiff’s motion for entry of proofs and judgment, along with a motion to restore her possession of the marital home. Defendant claimed arguments premised on unconscionability.

To establish undue influence, it must be shown that the grantor was subjected to threats, misrepresentation, undue flattery, fraud, or physical or moral coercion sufficient to overpower volition, destroy free agency and impel the grantor to act against his inclination and free will.

Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in failing to determine ALF’s established custodial environment before it modified the custody order. Plaintiff correctly states that the trial court failed to determine the established custodial environment.

Driving with a suspended license is a common occurrence in Michigan especially since there are limited public transport options. This makes it challenging to traverse around which brings about the temptation to get behind the wheel even after the...

In terrorem clauses, also called “no-contest” clauses, generally provide that a beneficiary of a will or trust forfeits any interest under the instrument if the beneficiary challenges or contests any of its provisions.

To award fees on the basis of misconduct, the trial court must determine that misconduct, in fact, occurred and that the misconduct caused the party seeking fees to incur the fees awarded.

Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in extending the status quo beyond entry of the JOD. Pursuant to MCR 3.207(C)(5), a temporary order remains in effect until modified or until the entry of the final judgment or order.

As set forth in MCL 700.2502(1), there are specific formalities that are generally required to execute a valid will. However, as expressly stated in MCL 700.2502(1), there are several exceptions to these formalities.

When you decide to sell your home, you have the choice between using an agent to put your home on the market or selling it yourself. While hiring a reputable real estate agent is beneficial, hiring an attorney who specializes in the sale and...

The subcontracts written by Defendant and signed by Plaintiff unambiguously contemplated that if any disputes related to their subcontract found their way to a courtroom, a jury would not be impaneled to resolve them.

While physical separation is necessary for a finding that a spouse is not a surviving spouse for the purposes of EPIC, physical separation alone is insufficient.

Following a bench trial, the circuit court ruled that the seasonal boat hoist was not a structure under the Zoning Ordinance’s definition and therefore its erection did not violate the ordinance. The court rejected Plaintiff’s claim to title by acquiescence and also based on the legal descriptions of the lots. Accordingly, the court quieted title in defendants’ favor.

Plaintiffs advised the probate court that they intentionally failed to file a witness list and an exhibit list as required by the court’s scheduling order because they objected to and never wanted a trial.

Anyone who owns real estate in Michigan has made a valuable investment. Whether you acquire a home, business, or other property, you want to make sure that the transaction works in your favor and all documents are handled correctly. For real estate...

Pursuant to the Friend of the Court Act, MCL 552.501 et seq., when a domestic relations motion is submitted to a referee for hearing, a party who files a timely objection to the referee’s recommendation is entitled to have the matter reviewed by the trial court. MCL 552.507(4).

A claim accrues, and the limitations period begins to run, when the claim may be brought. Here, the breach of contract alleged occurred no earlier than September 2010, when defendants signed a seller’s disclosure statement (SDS) and the parties executed a purchase agreement.

Under Michigan law, parties may acquiesce to a new property boundary line. Acquiescence is established when a preponderance of the evidence establishes that the parties treated a particular boundary line as the property line.

The circuit court awarded defendant sole legal and physical custody of the minor children and awarded grandparenting time to plaintiffs.

Even if you don't believe underage drinking is a big deal, the police in Michigan take it serious. The penalties can include fines or even a potential criminal record. What Happens for a First Underage Drinking Offense? Under Michigan law,...

The court found that plaintiff would rather have her children in daycare than have them spend time with their father.

Appellant appealed Probate Court’s order denying his petition seeking enforcement of an option to purchase stock as conferred by the trust.

The appeals court concurred with the findings of the trial court that the assertions which provided the basis for defendant’s motion are within the bounds of normal life circumstances typical of 13-year-old teenagers.

The absence of an explicitly stated time for performance or payment does not render a contract invalid or unenforceable. One party’s substantial breach of a contract may relieve the other party of its obligation to perform under the contract. Substantial breach may be found in cases where the breach has effected such a change in essential operative elements of the contract that further performance by the other party is thereby rendered ineffective or impossible.

Plaintiff primarily contends that the arbitration panel’s majority incorrectly found that plaintiff bore the burden of proof.

Summer is here. While most people are dreaming about relaxing and taking a well-earned vacation, others are getting ready for their busiest time of year. According to a report by the US Department of Justice, the crime rate can increase more than...

The appeals court agreed with the trial court that plaintiff’s conduct in filing for divorce in another county while the Oakland County divorce judgment was still in effect violated that judgment of divorce.

When filing for divorce in Michigan, you may seek alimony, spousal support, from their spouse whenever they require financial aid. A judge may order your spouse to pay certain alimony. However, it depends on the prevailing circumstances. Also, the...

In this case, respondent’s counsel failed to notify respondent of his intent to withdraw from representation, and the court failed to notify respondent of the date of the termination trial.

Plaintiff failed to properly allege a cause of action for breach of contract, plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief necessarily fails. An injunction is an equitable remedy rather than an independent cause of action. It is not the remedy that supports the cause of action, but rather the cause of action that supports a remedy. Thus, without a cause of action, injunctive relief is not warranted, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff further injunctive relief.

The circuit court entered a default judgment of divorce ordering Defendant to pay Plaintiff $2,000 in spousal support each month. Only then did Defendant realize the divorce would not be as easy as he anticipated.

Despite the Release of Claims unambiguous terms, defendants filed complaints against plaintiffs with the Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA). Plaintiffs responded by filing a lawsuit.

Estate planning is no easy task. It can be a daunting, overwhelming and leave you with more questions than answers. Many people can benefit from having an estate plan and this article breaks down the top 3 mistakes to avoid when planning your...

With regard to the trial court’s order concerning preschool placement, plaintiff argues that the trial court erred by issuing the order without conducting an evidentiary hearing, making findings of fact, or analyzing the best-interest factors.

In this case, plaintiff argues that the trial court erred when it made a change from sole to joint legal custody without determining the established custodial environment.

The “tender back rule” requires that a party may not file a lawsuit asserting previously released claims or repudiate a release unless the party first repays all consideration received in exchange for the release.

The making of repairs and improvements necessary to the effective enjoyment of an easement is incidental to and part of the easement. Improvements, however, receive closer scrutiny than repairs.

This letter notified plaintiff that the document that plaintiff provided purporting to establish a commitment for a mortgage was fraudulent and that, based on plaintiff’s failure to comply with the terms of the agreement, the agreement was void.

Many homeowners are taking real estate matters into their own hands, especially when it comes to their own homes. Some of the most difficult tasks FSBO sellers encounter are selling their home at the right price, understanding paperwork and selling...

The point is, while perhaps everything alleged is true, if you have not met your burden of proof you cannot win your case.

Separate assets may lose their character as separate property and transform into marital property if they are commingled with marital assets and treated by the parties as marital property.

For some, debt is inevitable. Many individuals have some form of debt whether it’s credit card debt or student loans. You and your spouse may have accumulated debt over the years and this raises a huge question. How is debt split up in a...

It is not enough for a defendant to announce a position or assert an error and then leave it up to the Court to discover and rationalize the basis for his/her claims and then search for authority either to sustain or reject his/her position.

The probate court’s decision to order the property sold and the proceeds distributed equally among the beneficiaries is consistent with the settlor’s stated intent to distribute the value of the trust assets to the beneficiaries.

The trial court concluded that the home was marital property subject to division because defendant contributed to the marital home by working on it; plaintiff and defendant lived together in the home for two years; and defendant paid for the expenses of the home for six months.

If a party fails to comply with a court order, upon motion by an opposing party, the court may enter a default against the noncomplying party.

MCL 700.7111(1) provides that interested persons may enter into a binding nonjudicial settlement agreement with respect to any matter involving a trust, including the approval of a trustee’s report or accounting.

Once a divorce is finalized, there still may be a few legal issues that can happen after the divorce proceeding. It’s even possible that new issues can arise after the divorce. In either event, a divorce lawyer can help guide you through these...

It is mandatory that the court dispose of the related matters of alimony, support and property. Accordingly, the court erred in concluding that the judgment of separate maintenance necessarily controlled.

MCL 257.709(1)(a) provides that a person shall not operate a motor vehicle with [a] sign, poster, nontransparent material, window application, reflective film, or nonreflective film upon or in the front windshield, the side windows immediately adjacent to the driver or front passenger

A noncharitable irrevocable trust may be modified or terminated by the court upon the consent of the trustee and the qualified trust beneficiaries, if the court concludes that the modification or termination of the trust is consistent with the material purposes of the trust or that continuance of the trust is not necessary to achieve any material purpose of the trust.

  For sale by owner (FSBO) homes can be a daunting task. However, if you want to do it correctly and smoothly, it’s best done with some assistance from a real estate lawyer. A real estate attorney has the knowledge and experience to...

MCL 700.7602(3)(a) controls a situation of whether a trust can be amended. It provides as follows: The settlor may revoke or amend a revocable trust by substantially complying with a method provided in the terms of the trust.

A contempt proceeding for failure to comply with a parenting time order is generally considered civil in nature.

The threshold to changing custody, finding a change of circumstance or proper cause are intended to erect a barrier against removal of a child from an established custodial environment and to minimize unwarranted and disruptive changes of custody orders.

The Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA), provides very limited circumstances in which persons involved with the use of marijuana, may avoid criminal liability. Accomplices to crimes may be prosecuted under an aiding and abetting theory.

  Divorce is a stressful time, and it's only made worse if you don't prepare properly. After receiving divorce papers, it may take some time to digest what’s happening. The moments after being served, you may have many...

This case involves parties who, after living in Michigan for several years, returned to their native country of India in 2014 with their three children. In 2016, plaintiff returned to Michigan and filed for divorce.

In the application, petitioner stated that the decedent died intestate, and after exercising reasonable diligence, was unaware of any unrevoked testamentary instrument relating to property located in this state.

The court determined that plaintiff’s documents were ambiguous and concluded that they did not meet the requirements of a recordable document. Plaintiff’s deed for real property did not contain terms of consideration or a legal description.

The fact that the officers subjected defendant to a Terry stop does not automatically lead to the conclusion that the stop violated the Fourth Amendment.

In the state of Michigan, the possession of marijuana is illegal unless you have a medical condition that is debilitating. Below we discuss the marijuana statutes in Michigan. Medical Marijuana The Michigan Medical Marijuana Act states that...

Once the statutory redemption period lapses, courts can only entertain the setting aside of a foreclosure sale where the mortgagor has made a clear showing of fraud, or irregularity.

In this case, the court is asked whether a presumed father may, in a divorce action, challenge his paternity of a child born during the course of the marriage despite the fact that he did not raise the issue within three years of the child’s birth.

Real estate litigation can happen to anyone, from buyers and sellers to real estate agents, there’s always a potential for a lawsuit. With a lot of money on the line, it’s crucial to have an experienced attorney who has a great...

An easement may be lost through abandonment. An easement is abandoned when the owner of the easement relinquishes it with the intention of releasing his or her right to the easement. Nonuse of the easement alone does not result in abandonment of the easement.

If you become incapacitated, you will need someone to make decisions on your behalf. These are decisions regarding what medical treatment you receive, paying bills, managing your bank accounts and potentially selling assets. Tales of people abusing their power of attorney designations are common. Many people designate their children, but is this the best choice?

Plaintiff sought to limit the rights of non-riparian lot owners to maintain a dock at the end of a dedicated private road abutting a lake.

Possessing controlled substances is a serious crime that involves drugs and drug paraphernalia. What defines a controlled substance are federal laws like the Controlled Substance Act as well as various state laws. The Controlled Substance...

Plaintiff argues that failing to place a value on defendant’s two businesses and awarding them to defendant, is depriving plaintiff of assets to which she is entitled.

The petitioner has the burden to prove by clear and convincing evidence that termination of the noncustodial parent’s rights is warranted. In order to terminate parental rights, the court must find that the requirements of subsections (a) and (b) are both satisfied.

Although the trial court recognized that a marital estate will normally be divided 50/50, it elected to award 60% to defendant and 40% to plaintiff.

In the state of Michigan, the law requires you to take either a blood, breath or urine test if arrested for an OWI. Michigan has an “implied consent” law which states that if someone lawfully arrested by an officer who has probable cause...

  Misdemeanors are often considered a less serious criminal offense compared to their felony counterpart. Common misdemeanors include reckless driving, petty theft, public intoxication, trespassing and more. Although misdemeanors don’t...

The fact that an asset is obtained as a separate asset does not mean its status cannot change. Separate assets may lose their character as separate property and transform into marital property.

Under this section, a homeowner must seek prior approval from the Association before he or she can change the exterior color of his or her home. If that requirement is violated, the Association is entitled to have the color changed and the home repainted a different color at the homeowner’s expense.

An person who proceeds in propria persona is generally held to the same standards as attorneys. Accordingly, a litigant who decides to proceed without counsel is bound by the burdens that accompany such election.

The Court recognizes that the object in awarding spousal support is to balance the incomes and needs of the parties so that neither will be impoverished; spousal support is to be based on what is just and reasonable under the circumstances of the case.

This dispute appears to be whether the arbitrator effectively modified the parties’ Uniform Spousal Support Order by awarding plaintiff 19.5% of the profits from the sale of defendant’s stock.

The informal conference referee found that she was an owner of the property because she was a grantor who had placed her property in a revocable trust. The referee, however, determined that petitioner had failed to present any documentation showing that the property was the deceased’s principal residence.

The trial court analyzed the circumstances of defendant’s specific case and concluded that defendant was not an appropriate candidate to use marijuana while on probation.

Given her noncompliance with her service plan and her lack of progress in addressing her serious mental illnesses, the evidence supports the conclusion that there is no reasonable expectation that respondent will be able to provide proper care.

The referee explained as follows: Michigan law is clear that a minor child cannot have two legal fathers.

This matter arises out of an ongoing dispute between a unit owner in the Condominium, and the Condominium Association.

Appellant appeals from an order of the Probate Court denying his petition to reopen his deceased mother’s estate.

Under Michigan law, parties may acquiesce to a new property boundary line. Acquiescence is established when a preponderance of the evidence establishes that the parties treated a particular boundary line as the property line.

The trial court ordered that the child finish kindergarten at the school that he was attending and enroll in the school halfway between for the following school year beginning in the fall of 2017.

In this contest over the probate and non-probate assets of Decedent, appellate petitioned to set aside pour-over will and trust documents executed by Decedent

The day after the trial court entered its order, Defendant C quitclaimed his interest in the property to Defendant B, who then sold the property on land contract to new owners.

Before modifying an existing custody order, a trial court is required to find that the party seeking to modify the custody order has shown, by a preponderance of the evidence, proper cause or change of circumstances as set forth in MCL 722.27.

After the judgment of divorce was entered, plaintiff moved for relief from judgment, claiming that defendants-ex-wife and her attorney engaged in fraudulent conduct and that there was newly discovered evidence supporting that position.

Contracts can be divided into two categories: express contracts and implied contracts. An express contract is one where the intention of the parties and the terms of the agreement are declared or expressed by the parties, in writing or orally. Alternatively, a contract may be implied from the conduct of the parties, language used or things done by them, or other pertinent circumstances attending the transaction.

For some, assault and battery are two terms that are commonly mixed up or used interchangeably while conversing.

Your home is likely your most valuable asset, so it's extremely important to protect your interests during the buying or selling process. While real estate agents and brokers are trained to assist their clients through each step of buying or...

Plaintiff filed a six-count complaint against defendants for a violation of the anti-lockout statute, injunctive relief for illegal lockout, conversion, negligent infliction of emotional distress, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and for exemplary damages.

The court ruled that the husband’s home was a premarital asset belonging to him alone, denied the wife’s request for spousal support and awarded minimal attorney fees.

The primary goal when construing a will is to determine the intent of the testator.

With respect to a request to modify child custody, a trial court is required to determine whether there is an established custodial environment with one or both parents before making any custody determination.

An established custodial environment is established if over an appreciable time the child naturally looks to the custodian in that environment for guidance, discipline, the necessities of life, and parental comfort.

If you are charged with a crime, you could be facing some severe penalties that could include financial fines, public service, or even jail time. For those that are in the Michigan area, hiring an attorney that is experienced in criminal defense...

In Michigan, as in most states, the law gives people the chance to expunge, or erase, a conviction from their record.

In this case, the husband argues on appeal that the probate court abused its discretion by appointing a conservator to manage his wife’s estate and affairs under MCL 700.5401.

The 10-year statute of limitations on a claim relating to a property settlement in a judgment of divorce begins to run at the time the claim accrues and that the claim accrues when the money owing under the property settlement comes due.

This case arises out of the sale of residential property. Within a few months of purchase, plaintiffs experienced severe flooding of the house and surrounding property. At one point, there was nearly one foot of standing water in the living room.

Plaintiff and defendant were involved in a romantic relationship, but never married. After the relationship ended, plaintiff sued defendant, seeking repayment for $68,784.50 in payments he claims he made for her living expenses.

Under the EPIC, a “suitable” guardian is one who is qualified and able to provide for the ward’s care, custody, and control. When a preponderance of the evidence weighs against the suitability of the ward’s current choice for guardian, the probate court must remove that person as guardian.

In this case, defendant appeals order requiring him to pay plaintiff attorney fees in the amount of $22,000, consisting of $10,000 for plaintiff’s divorce attorney and $12,000 for a business attorney.

In this case involving a Living Trust, the husband, appeals as of right the probate court’s order granting partial summary disposition to their daughter. The order resolved claims relating to two family businesses, declared the wife disabled, and pursuant to the terms of the trust, removed the husband as successor trustee of the trust.

This case presents the question of whether a warrant is required for a police officer, not investigating any wrongdoing, to open the passenger door of a parked truck to ask whether the sleeping occupant of the truck would be able to drive the occupant’s intoxicated girlfriend home.

On January 6, 2017, Governor Snyder signed into law the package of bills that abolish dower rights in the State of Michigan, however, the bills do apply the right of dower to a surviving widow whose husband passed away prior to the effective date of the bills.

The only fact the trial court used to rule that defendant should receive 25% of the value was that he contributed and sacrificed little to the Book of Business and this was not a concerted effort.

Plaintiff moved to set aside the revised proposed QDRO, arguing that it was time-barred under the ten-year statute of limitations set forth in MCL 600.5809(3).

To prevail on a claim of adverse possession, plaintiffs must show that they possessed the disputed property openly, adversely, exclusively, and continuously for at least 15 years. A party making an adverse possession claim can meet the time requirement by tacking their possessory period to that of their predecessors in interest with whom they are in privity of estate.

In this case, Defendant appealed his conviction of operating a vehicle while intoxicated, third offense.

A plea bargain is an agreement made between the prosecutor and the defendant in which the accused person agrees to plead guilty or no contest in exchange for the prosecutor dropping the charges or recommending a lower sentence to the judge or...

In this case defendant (father) appeals the trial court denying his motion to modify custody of the parties’ three minor children.

In instances of trespass where injunctive relief and actual damages are not warranted, a plaintiff nevertheless is entitled to nominal damages. Because a trespass violates a landholder’s right to exclude others from the premises, the landholder could recover at least nominal damages even in the absence of proof of any other injury.

Under the Michigan Medical Marijuana Act, both an immunity provision (Section 4) and an affirmative defense provision (Section 8) offer protection against prosecution for the medical use of marijuana.

Being arrested in Michigan is certainly not going to be a fun experience no matter what, but it can be easier when you understand exactly what will happen and why. Find out more about how you can get out of jail by posting bond.  What are...

The Michigan Supreme Court found that defendant's private driveway was an area generally accessible to motor vehicles. Because defendant allegedly operated a motor vehicle in his driveway while intoxicated, this was probable cause for OWI.

While the “right to remain silent” represents one of your most unassailable rights, many people have a few misconceptions about how it works. A lot of people receive their understanding of this particular right from media and...

Defendant appeals his conviction of unlicensed residential builder. The trial court sentenced to 18 months’ probation, and $6,300 in restitution.

Plaintiff ex-wife appeals trial court’s order awarding defendant ex-husband over $22,000 in attorney fees and costs incurred by defendant in addressing plaintiff’s contempt of court for violation of the parties’ divorce judgment.

The marijuana was found in his car’s trunk during a search that followed from a police dog alerting to the marijuana’s smell. Defendant argues that the trial court erred in finding that the search did not violate his rights under the Fourth Amendment.

Michigan forbids the presence of open alcoholic beverage containers in the passenger area of vehicles.

Defendant argues that the trial court’s 60/40 distribution of the marital estate in plaintiff’s favor was inappropriately punitive. According to defendant, the trial court placed a disproportionate amount of weight on the parties’ respective fault, while ignoring defendant’s significant financial contributions to the marital estate.

When a child is in relative placement, a trial court must explicitly address whether termination is appropriate in light of the children’s placement with relatives.

A license to access a lake is a mere permission to do some act or series of acts on the land without having any permanent interest in it.

The trial court’s opinion and order terminated respondent’s parental rights to the minor child under MCL 710.51(6) (failure to comply with a support order for two years or more and failure to visit, contact, or communicate with the child for two years or more).

When dividing property in a divorce, trial courts must first determine marital and separate assets.

The Fourth Amendment has drawn a firm line at the entrance to the house. Absent exigent circumstances, that threshold may not reasonably be crossed without a warrant.

Beneficiaries are entitled to contest the probate of the will. It is important that your will clearly state your intentions.

When people are thinking about planning their estate, they often think about trying to minimize the estate tax, keeping their will updated, and keeping items out of probate court; however, there is another important issue that people need to think...

Plaintiff, age 67 at the time of divorce, and defendant, age 59 at the time of divorce, were married for 23 years. The judgment of divorce provides for a division of property. Defendant appeals arguing that the trial court erred in determining the...

Since the first smartphones were introduced nearly a decade ago, there has been a gradual shift from widespread use of traditional paper documents to digital documents. If you need proof, consider that most people have plane tickets on their phones,...

Plaintiff sought an increase in child support, claiming the defendant-father's income had increased substantially, which constituted a change in circumstances. In July 2015, plaintiff filed a motion to modify child support. In that motion,...

We all know that divorce is not easy, no matter how ready you may be to get out of a troubled marriage. There are certainly emotional hurdles to overcome as you move on with life, and the financial hurdles may take longer to get over than you may...

Being stopped by the police is not usually a pleasant experience. Even with the most benign of infractions, the encounter can be adversarial. Indeed, the notion of authority can lead to citizens doing things that they are not required to do out of...

Defendant appeals as of right his conviction, following a jury trial, of possession with intent to deliver marijuana. Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in excluding evidence relating to his debilitating medical condition, as well...

If you do not already have an estate plan in place, you likely have many questions about the wide range of legal tools that may be available for your interests. Some people believe that a basic will is all that is needed to create an effective...

The parties were divorced on March 22, 2010, and agreed to share joint legal and physical custody of their two minor children through a consent judgment of divorce. Then, on May 4, 2010, plaintiff gave physical custody of the children to defendant...

The probate court denied a petition for formal proceedings. The petition further identifies the petitioner as a "creditor" of the estate and states that "Litigation against the Estate is pending." Appellee is the widow and was...

Most of us dread the sight of flashing emergency lights behind us, signaling us to pull over. This generally means that a citation is imminent. But in some situations, law enforcement may want to take things a step further and ask us to “exit...

You create an estate plan to make sure your heirs and beneficiaries are taken care of in the event you are no longer able to. You may also do so to minimize the bickering and infighting that may come between surviving family members who may have...

Washtenaw Probate Court. The dispute in this case involves the meaning of the term "then beneficiary" in the Trust. This term defines the party or parties who are entitled to vote on the removal of a trustee and the appointment of a...

Defendant appeals the trial court's order denying spousal support. Defendant argued that the trial court should have conducted a spousal support review and that any language restricting the modification of spousal support in the judgment must be...

The defendant argued that the court erred because Officer's stop of his vehicle violated the Fourth Amendment. Officer pulled defendant over, and when he approached the vehicle, he smelled alcohol and saw that defendant's eyes were glassy...

With the federal income tax filing deadline coming this week, it is a good time to talk about taxes and how they may apply to estates. While federal estate tax applies to few estates (i.e. those valued at more than $3.5 million), it continues to be...

Defendant and plaintiff are the parents of twin girls who were born in 2007. The parties were never married. They lived together for approximately four years after the children were born, but separated in March 2011. There is no dispute that...

If you have been convicted of a crime, have served your sentence, and have followed all court recommendations, you should be able to put your past behind you and move on with life. Moving forward is critical given the stigma against...

The decedent died intestate in February 2014 at the age of 84. His wife had died in 1999. Decedent was survived by three sons: (Paul), petitioner and personal representative (Mike), and respondent (Greg). Decedent and his wife opened a joint account...

Plaintiff purchased a house. The "Bank" foreclosed on the property. Plaintiff approached his uncle, Defendant, and asked him to purchase the property on his behalf from the Bank and then sell the property back to him for the same price...

Plaintiff-mother appeals, contesting the trial court's awarding both parties joint physical and legal custody of their child. The trial court divided parenting time equally. Plaintiff-mother initially argues that the trial court erred in...

If you have been charged with a crime, it is essential to know how strong the government’s case is against you. Indeed, you may think the state has a flimsy case and has a snowball’s chance to prove you guilty beyond a reasonable doubt,...

If your child is getting ready to graduate from high school this spring, you are probably amazed with how quickly the years have gone by since they first started kindergarten. This also means that you are getting older too, and you have probably...

Defendant was arrested after being found intoxicated in the parking lot of an apartment building in Michigan. The Public Safety Sergeant responded to the scene. After conducting an investigation and speaking to witnesses, Safety Sergeant concluded...

While the Affordable Health Care Act is poised to be amended or replaced completely, the law still has a number of useful provisions that some legislators are uncomfortable parting with. For instance, the current version allows states to create...

Plaintiff and defendant were married in 1995 when they were in their mid-50s and after both of their first marriages ended. At the time of marriage, defendant had an IRA valued at approximately $800,000. After three years of marriage, due to a...

Plaintiff filed for divorce, after a marriage of almost 33 years. Defendant was employed as a gas mechanic. Plaintiff previously worked part time for school districts for approximately 11 years, cut hair for several years, and worked as a...

If you have been arrested and are being held on the suspicion that you have committed a particular crime, chances are that the only thing you are thinking about is getting out of jail as soon as possible and proving your innocence. Under state and...

While we focus most of our estate planning posts on protecting assets and preparing beneficiaries for transfers of wealth, it is also important to focus on protecting those loved ones who are vulnerable. They may include elderly family members who...

In order to convict defendant of operating while intoxicated under MCL 257.625(1), the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:(1) the defendant operated a motor vehicle(2) on a highway or other place open to the general public or...

Much has been reported on the escalating costs parents face in raising a child. From birth to age 18, it is estimated that parents spend an average of $234,000 to raise a child. But when it comes to caring for an elderly parent, the costs are...

MCL 722.31(1) prohibits a parent of a child whose custody is governed by court order from changing a legal residence of the child to a location that is more than 100 miles from the child's residence at the time the order is issued. However, a...

Plaintiff filed divorce action after a nearly 20-year marriage. Although defendant apparently participated in various pretrial conferences and discussed the terms of the divorce judgment, he did not answer the complaint, a default was entered, and...

In 2014, plaintiff purchased a parcel of land ("Parcel C") at a sheriff's sale. Previous owner was the sole owner of the property from 1988 until he lost the property to foreclosure for non-payment of taxes. There is a building on the site, which...

If you haven’t noticed by the commercials and networks devoted to them, America has definitely become a pet nation. It is estimated that two-thirds of all American households own a cat or a dog.  With some pets being considered cherished family...

Law enforcement agencies are always looking for an edge in fighting crime. As cell phones have become an indispensible part of life for many people, authorities have taken to using these devices to track suspects' locations and movements without...

People work hard to build up their estate during their lives and when they pass they may desire to hand down their estate to their friends and family. Leaving property to a loved one in an estate plan can be troubling for some parents who have...

Now that the Super Bowl has come and gone, many men around the country are making new weight loss goals. According to a survey by NutriSystem, the average NFL fan packs on 10 pounds during the season. With the final game of season in the books,...

The parties were married in 1998 and their divorce was finalized in 2015. Following entry of the judgment of divorce, both parties filed motions for attorney fees. Defendant argued that he was entitled to attorney fees because plaintiff had driven...

The period between the end of January and the second week of April is widely known as “tax season.” Most people anticipate receiving a refund after filing their federal income tax returns. However, there are a number of scenarios that may bring...

Defendant pleaded no contest to OWI, third offense, and operating without a valid license.The trial court sentenced him to 3 years' probation, with 60 days to be served in jail and 1 year of SCRAM tether. Among the conditions of his probation were...

Plaintiff appealed the trial court's order denying plaintiff's motion to modify physical custody of two of the parties' minor children. In 2014, a consent order was entered wherein the parties agreed to share joint legal custody of all three...

There is a great deal of information available on the internet concerning the issues that parents may face that require a solid estate plan. The volume of storylines addressing estate planning for young parents may seem to suggest that married...

If you have been paying attention to recent headlines regarding tax law, you likely have heard that tax season has officially begun. This means that the Internal Revenue Service is ready to start accepting federal income tax returns. In all, the...

The Judgment of Divorce declared that Plaintiff was entitled one-half of the pension benefits Defendant had accrued during his marriage to Plaintiff, with full rights of survivorship, and that these benefits were due to Plaintiff when they became...

When potential clients ask us questions about criminal defense representation (particularly for drunk driving offenses) one of the most common is whether they will lose their job.  Naturally, this depends on a number of factors, including how much...

Plaintiff filed for divorce in October 2012 after confirming that her husband (defendant) had been having an affair with his former co-worker. After the proceedings began, plaintiff learned that the defendant had given former co-worker hundreds of...

Defendant was convicted of possession with intent to deliver 45 kilograms or more of marijuana. He challenged the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress. Defendant argued that the Trooper did not have a reasonable suspicion for the initial...

The emotional toils of dealing with the death of a loved one can be considerably difficult. It is especially hard at this time of year, where life is supposed to be consumed with optimism for a New Year. Nevertheless, perseverance is paramount;...

When we create our estate plans, we intend to leave something for our heirs in order to remember us, or to make sure they are taken care of. Indeed, these are well-intentioned goals, but leaving certain assets could have unintended consequences for...

The court held that the trial court properly terminated the father's parental rights to the child where at least one statutory ground for termination was established by clear and convincing evidence and it was in the child's best interests.The...

The court held that because MCL 750.474 (illegal transportation of marijuana) is not part of the MMMA (Michigan Medical Marijuana Act), the defendant, as a compliant medical marijuana patient, could not be prosecuted for violating it.Illegal...

The vast majority of businesses in America are closely-held enterprises. You likely know that not all closely-held companies are run by members of a single family. Many individuals have an interest in a business that is owned by a relatively small...

Petitioner is 89 years old, and the father of two adult children. In 2013, petitioner's wife of 66 years passed away. Following her death, petitioner suffered from depression. In addition to his depression, he had several other health problems...

Anyone who has seen the movie “Arthur” (either the Dudley Moore or Russell Brand versions) can understand the frustrations wealthy parents may have with leaving a great deal of money to their heirs. Essentially, they worry that the kids will...

In this property dispute, plaintiffs filed suit against defendant to enforce a prescriptive easement that allows plaintiffs to place and use a seasonal dock.Plaintiffs are the successors in interest to plaintiff's mother, who acquired the property...

Plaintiff appeals the judgment of divorce that awarded defendant 50% of the equity in the marital home, all of workers' compensation benefits, and certain personal property items. Court affirmed the trial court's division of the financial assets of...

With college semesters ending in Michigan, it may not be so easy to get college students to think responsibly, especially in the throes finishing finals and having opportunities to let off steam. However, parents should do their best to teach their...

Court affirms that speeding and running red lights constitutes reckless driving and indicates willful and wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property.Defendant was convicted of reckless driving causing death and serious impairment of a...

The approaching holidays may bring about fond memories for some people. They also represent a chance for people to reconnect with family members who have aged another year, especially parents. For those with older or elderly parents, the topic of...

Any person named in a will or chosen by the court of law to make important decisions for another person is called a guardian. The person who the guardian is responsible for is known as the 'ward' and cannot make certain decisions. Guardians might...

Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed that termination of father's parental rights was in the child' best interests.The caseworker testified that the father never met the child because he was continually incarcerated during the child's entire life....

Parents of young children frequently have to juggle schedules and make plans to continue to provide for the kids, while keeping involved in their extracurricular interests. Dreaming about the future is an added value for parents who think about the...

People can be arrested for drunk driving after a field sobriety test even if they were sober. Field sobriety tests may be difficult to pass.Many Michigan residents celebrate this time of year by attending parties or having drinks with friends. As a...

People who live and drive in Plymouth, Michigan should learn the state's laws and penalties for drunk driving offenses and related charges. People who live and drive in Plymouth, Michigan know that the state takes any charge of drunk driving very...

Michigan residents who have seen television police shows or movies involving law enforcement have no doubt watched many dramatic scenes with officers quoting something to the effect of, "You have the right to remain silent..." This phrase is a part...

Now that the nation’s presidential election has passed, it appears that the markets are adjusting to the new found sense of stability with the election of Donald Trump. Indeed, it remains to be seen how the economy will change going forward, but...

The Court of Appeals held that "MCL 700.2503 permits the admission of a will to probate that does not meet the signature requirement in MCL 700.2502(1)(b), as long as the proponent establishes by clear and convincing evidence that the decedent...

In a published case, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's order to the extent it ruled that compliance with the parenting time order constituted "full-time" and remanded for it to consider (where relevant) the Workman factors in...

The court agreed with plaintiff that the trial court erred in failing to consider whether the change was in the child's best interests, noting it "failed to make reviewable findings of fact regarding whether a modification of defendant's parenting...

The older we get, the faster time seems to go. Often people are too busy with the needs of today to think about planning for the future. By the time you retire or need extensive medical care, you may be ineligible for long-term health insurance...

Thus, it affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. Plaintiff sued defendant for injuries she sustained when she slipped and fell on ice in a common area of the apartment complex where she resided. The trial court summarily dismissed her...

The trial court terminated respondent's parental rights on the basis that she exposed the child to harm, including allowing improper contact with adult guests, including the child's biological mother, who had previously violently abused the child,...

While no one wants to think of the unfortunate possibility of being incapacitated or of a time when we can't handle our own affairs, this circumstance is a real possibility. If something happens and this becomes a reality, having someone designated...

Plaintiff alleged that she was injured "when she fell over the sheer edge of an excavated hole created by defendants." The trial court found that her failure to personally sign the notice letter was a "fatal defect." On appeal, the court concluded...

Whether you a father seeking more parenting time and decision-making power in  your child’s life, or you are a mother who is fearful of losing a child, custody battles bring out the worst fears (and sometimes, simply the worst) in...

When you're thinking of long-term healthcare for an elderly loved one, you need to be aware of the laws in Michigan. Medicaid, for example, has very strict guidelines for who can and can't qualify. Residents over the age of 65 or people with...

The parties divorced and the trial court handled the distribution of property as well as spousal and child support. On appeal, the court rejected plaintiff's argument that the trial court's distribution of the marital property was not equitable....

A residence was conveyed to the decedent, Lyle F. Steiner, and the intervenor, Steven M. Steiner (Lyle's son). Years later, when Lyle passed away, Steven was appointed PR of Lyle's estate. "DHHS filed a claim against the estate for unpaid Medicaid...

If you have elderly relatives who still live in their homes, they probably rely on you for a number of things; whether it is to help them to doctor’s appointments or to ensure that they don’t sign off on dubious documents. For as much help as...

When considering estate planning, you are probably aware of the role of a will. While the traditional thought associated with a will is how property is handled after death, it can also be used to plan for medical treatment if you cannot make...

At age 22, Plaintiff moved to Florida with her boyfriend in 6/12. "During her testimony, plaintiff repeatedly referenced 'moving' to Florida and 'visiting' in Michigan." She signed a lease for a duplex in Florida "and lived there with her boyfriend...

Plaintiff fell when exiting defendant's store, tripping on "what she described as 'uneven' pavement." The court noted that she made no effort "to identify any unique circumstances that would render such an open and obvious condition unreasonably...

It can be difficult to consider the end of our lives when we are in good health, but lives can change at any moment so it is wise to be prepared for any situation that may arise. Despite the many benefits of a last will and testament, studies have...

Respondent-mother admitted that her son (WB) sexually abused the children at issue in this case (her daughters, AT and HK), but asserted that there was no evidence she "had an opportunity to prevent the abuse." The court found her argument...

The children "were placed in protective custody after respondent used inappropriate physical discipline on her son and authorities discovered that respondent's home lacked food and sleeping accommodations for the children." The trial court ordered...

As the mother's case proceeded, the circuit court placed the child in the father's custody, and instead of continuing the matter so respondent could engage in services and work toward reunification, it completely dismissed the child protective...

Plaintiff was awarded 50% of defendant's retirement pay, or "disposable military retired pay," as calculated based on his creditable military service during the marriage. They also agreed to an "offset provision," which was designed to "address a...

Intervening plaintiff-Badgett was entitled to no-fault benefits from Allstate. After a "jury trial involving a dispute over Ruben's charges to Allstate for medical services and products provided to Badgett, the parties entered into a final judgment...

Petitioner, the decedent's son, asserted that the decedent executed a will leaving almost the whole estate to him. Respondent, the decedent's daughter, contended that he "forged the document he wished to enter into probate, and thus that the...

Plaintiffs filed suit to quiet title to a circular driveway that runs through property owned by one of the defendants and provides access to property currently owned by the trust. On appeal, the court agreed with plaintiffs that by virtue of...

On appeal, the respondent offered two claims of error as to the trial court's decision to terminate respondent's parental rights to CC and AC. First, respondent argued that the trial court clearly erred by finding that termination was appropriate...

Plaintiff was seriously injured when she and the defendant collided while skiing. The jury declined to award either economic or noneconomic damages, even though it found defendant 50% negligent. The trial court found that the verdict as to economic...

Plaintiff-mother appealed a final order closing the case in this child support and parenting time dispute. However, her issues on appeal related to the trial court's prior order granting the defendant-father out-of-state parenting time. Plaintiff...

The parties had a child together, but never married. They entered into a mediated parenting time and custody agreement. Defendant later objected to the agreement and requested a best interests hearing, which the trial court denied. On appeal, the...

Prior to her death in 1/14, Angeline LaMarche received $107,310.76 in Medicaid benefits. After she passed away, the DHHS pursued recovery in that amount against the estate. On appeal, the estate again argued that allowing the DHHS to recover for...

The trial court assumed jurisdiction because she was mentally unstable and unable to provide consistent care. She failed to benefit from mental health services. Although respondent's case manager (R) gave generally favorable testimony, he also...

Respondent's argument focused on the fact that he was released from prison prior to the termination hearing. He claimed he was now prepared to parent the children, or would be prepared to do so soon. The record indicated otherwise. As it related to...

Thus, it vacated the order awarding attorney fees and remanded for further proceedings on this issue, but otherwise affirmed. As to the application of the Sparks factors, while "defendant received significantly more property than plaintiff" under...

On remand, the trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing and "provided a clear ruling explaining why it found termination" was in the children's best interests. It considered the appropriate factors and found that respondent "was not compliant...

The trial court terminated their rights based on their abuse of the child's sibling and/or failure to protect her from the other parent's abuse. On appeal, the court rejected respondent-mother's argument that termination was inappropriate because...

Plaintiff sued defendant for injuries he sustained when he was struck by an automobile as he was removing groceries from the trunk of another automobile. The trial court ruled for defendant, finding that because plaintiff "was not 'occupying' the...

Defendant was convicted of OWI causing death and sentenced to one year in the county jail for killing a bicyclist with his car. The prosecution argued that the trial court erred in imposing an unreasonable sentence of a year in the county jail...

The Court of Appeals affirmed the order terminating her parental rights. It was undisputed that more than 182 days passed between the initial dispositional order and the termination order. "During that time, respondent did not comply with any...

Given the length of the case and his "noncompliance, lack of accountability, and his substance abuse issues-including multiple relapses when he was close to reunification- there was not a reasonable expectation that he would be able to provide...

Norman argued that the trial court's finding of an ECE with Curtis was against the great weight of the evidence, meaning that the trial court erred by applying a clear and convincing standard as opposed to a preponderance of the evidence standard....

The decedent maintained checking and savings accounts. Shortly before his death, while he was hospitalized and unable to communicate, appellant-Claudette Greenhoe deposited an inheritance check that the decedent received in his savings account. The...

She agreed that the DHHS was not required to provide services because termination was sought in the initial petition. However, she contended that she should have been provided with services toward reunification because she "seemed ready, willing,...

Before the child was born, respondent (at the age of 18) pleaded guilty to CSC I. The victim was his nine-year-old cousin. Petitioner testified that she learned the facts of respondent's conviction after she gave birth to the child, and broke off...

After being arrested during a traffic stop, defendant-Calvetti signed her Miranda warnings, acknowledging that she knew her rights and indicating that she "did not want to answer questions." She argued that the DEA agent's continued questioning...

He argued that the court should "dispense with" the Strickland prejudice inquiry and "presume prejudice" under Cronic, which provides an exception to a prejudice inquiry "where 'the likelihood that any lawyer, even a fully competent one, could...

In the divorce judgment, plaintiff was awarded the home, and defendant was awarded a 50% equity interest in the home. The judgment also covered the parties' various other obligations. Shortly before the divorce, defendant entered into a written fee...

The case involved plaintiff's challenge to an amendment of the Trust that disinherited him. Both plaintiff and defendant-Paul M. Lubienski (secondary successor trustee) jointly argued that the circuit court erred in concluding that it lacked...

Concluding that the trial court should have applied Haab as clarified by Widmayer, the court reversed the grant of the defendants' summary disposition motion and denial of the plaintiffs' motion for partial summary disposition on the issue of the...

The legally incapacitated person at issue, Mary Janet, was the parties' mother. Appellee, her son, was appointed her guardian and conservator. Appellant, her daughter, sought to modify the conservatorship by removing appellee as conservator and...

The plaintiff-wife challenged the trial court's order finding her in contempt on two grounds. First, she contended that the trial court clearly erred in concluding that she willfully disobeyed its orders requiring that her children be afforded...

It also held that the trial court did not err in refusing to suppress the evidence merely because the affidavit did not establish that defendant was not entitled to the immunity defense. He was convicted of possession with intent to deliver...

Plaintiff was a passenger in defendant's truck when defendant lost control of it and crashed into a median, causing plaintiff to suffer serious injuries. He sued defendant for failure to maintain equipment and negligent driving. He later amended...

Defendant argued that the trial court erred when it made its threshold determination that proper cause or a Change Of Circumstance did not exist to warrant revisiting the issue of custody. The last custody order was entered on 10/8/14 by consent of...

Also, it did not err by excluding evidence that Detective M presented a marijuana patient card. It did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of marijuana, scales, and packaging found at defendants' house. Further, there was sufficient...

The court held that the plaintiff-mother failed to establish grounds to change the child's domicile pursuant to MCL 722.31(4). Thus, the trial court did not have to reach her motion to take primary physical custody or analyze the statutory best...

The court held that the trial court did not err by allocating two assets to the defendant-ex-husband without including their value in the marital estate. However, it noted that based on the trial court's failure to make findings on the Sparks...

The Talamore for Three Trust became an owner of the property in 1/14. Petitioner was the trustee of the Trust and co-owner of the property. His 2/14 documents only showed that he rented a trailer that was delivered to Muskegon. His 4/14 receipts...

Plaintiff sought coverage for replacement services for 3/13, such as driving and running errands, after he was injured in a car accident. Defendant denied his claim, noting surveillance video showed him driving, lifting objects, and running...

The basis of his conviction was the seizure of hundreds of GM knockdown containers from his warehouse. He argued that there was no evidence that the containers were stolen because "(1) 52 of the containers recovered were provided by GM and (2)...

The referee presumed that plaintiff was a fit parent, but found petitioner had overcome the fit-parent presumption. The referee based her finding on the fact that an FOC report recommended grandparenting time. First, the court noted that the...

During a repair to its water line, plaintiff discovered that the line also served defendant's property. Plaintiff sought a declaratory ruling that defendant had no right to its water line and that plaintiff could remove defendant's connection. The...

The defendant-ex-husband argued that the trial court's division was inequitable and was based on the trial court's disproportionate assignment of fault. Although the trial court found that he was primarily at fault for the breakdown of the...

C stopped the car defendant was driving because it did not have a metal registration plate. When he pulled the car over, he saw a piece of paper on the left side of the rear window, but he could not read it. Asked to produce his identification,...

He was convicted of racketeering, armed robbery, five counts of felon in possession, five counts of felony-firearm, and four counts of bank robbery, arising out of a series of armed robberies. The trial court sentenced him as a fourth habitual...

He was sentenced as a fourth habitual offender to 3 to 6 years' imprisonment for Operating a vehicle While Intoxicated third offense and a concurrent term of 6 months' imprisonment for driving while license suspended. Defendant conceded that the...

He was convicted of domestic violence, third offense. The other acts involving defendant's wife (N) fell within the scope of MCL 768.27b, as the described conduct easily fell within the definition of domestic violence. Similarly, the other acts...

She was hit from behind by a pickup truck. Plaintiff argued that (1) she proffered documentary evidence that showed a genuine issue of material fact for trial, (2) the trial court failed to view the evidence in the light most favorable to her, (3)...

The parties were in a motor vehicle accident. Plaintiff sued defendant, claiming to have sustained a serious impairment of a body function as a result of the accident. Defendant moved for summary disposition on the basis plaintiff did not suffer an...

The plaintiff-ex-husband argued that the trial court's division of the marital estate was inequitable because the defendant-ex-wife received a car and a share of his retirement and pension benefits, while he was encumbered with the entire amount of...

The case arose from the plaintiffs' sale of three commercial lots to defendant-RAAW Enterprises by land contracts. Defendant-RAAW Management later executed a promissory note to a bank. Guaranty agreements were also executed. As security for the...

The issue was whether old-age social security benefits payable pursuant to § 402 are "tangible things of economic value" as the term is used in MCL 500.3108(1) and thus, can be considered in a calculation of survivors' loss benefits under the Act....

Plaintiff claimed he was under no obligation to state in his complaint that there were minor children from the parties' first marriage. MCR 3.206(A)(5)(b)'s two categories-"'whether there are minor children of the parties' and 'minor children born...

Her argument that the trial court erred for the sole reason that she had a constitutional right to parent her children is without merit. She contended that there were no drug use, lack of housing, or lack of income issues. Her assertions as to drug...

Defendant-Sawyer was prosecuted for failure to comply with the NESHAP for asbestos when salvaging a former industrial site. The court first determined that he waived his right to appeal his sentence under the terms of his plea agreement; thus, it...

Ferrari worked under restrictions for Ford for several years before he sought an opportunity to enter Ford's apprenticeship program. The company doctor that examined him (B) declined to lift his work restrictions, finding that in addition to his...

Plaintiffs alleged that the defendants were negligent for failing to advise them as to the adequacy of their renter's insurance, specifically as it related to the plaintiff-husband's tool collection. The policy at issue, under the heading "Special...

Plaintiff sued defendants for injuries she sustained when she slipped and fell on ice in the driveway of her apartment. The trial court granted summary disposition for both defendants. As to Avalon, it found that the conditions were open and...

He was convicted of second-degree murder, Felon In Possession, and felony-firearm. He argued that his confession was not voluntary and thus, was inadmissible. However, the court disagreed. Defendant told the officers that he was 25 years old and...

The defendant-father challenged the trial court's findings that child's Established Custodial Enviornment (ECE) was with plaintiff alone. The trial court correctly articulated the standard, set forth in MCL 722.27(c). There was no dispute that the...

Hogan's first ERISA claim, challenging the insurance company's denial of ERISA benefits, was denied because the decision was not arbitrary or capricious. While that case was on appeal, she filed a negligence case in state court, suing the two...

As to § (c)(i), the record reflected that more than 182 days elapsed between the entry of the initial dispositional order and the termination hearing. It likewise reflected that respondent failed to adequately address the conditions that led to...

The parties-siblings disagreed as to the terms of their father's trust, which included a 300-acre farm. During their dispute, Daniel claimed that a settlement agreement between them did not preclude him from seeking compensation and reimbursement...

Plaintiff argued that the trial court clearly erred when it awarded defendant $5,700 for her share of the Harley. He contended that the parties had an agreement as to the Harley, pursuant to which he would be awarded the Harley and defendant would...

Walter and Yvonne Massie established the trust in 1995. The only asset in the trust was their home. Petitioners charged that Juzenas was required to provide them an accounting every year beginning in 2009, and was required to provide notification...

First, he incorrectly argued that he was not required to present evidence as to PC or a CIC because the trial court's initial custody decision was based on an agreement between the parties. "A negotiated settlement agreement 'does not diminish the...

Plaintiff argued that the trial court erred in denying his motion because the parties previously acknowledged that he is the child's biological father. He also contended that the trial court erred in denying his request to order that the parties...

Petitioner disputed the respondent-city's valuation of her property for the 2014 tax year. The TT affirmed the valuation. On appeal, the court agreed with petitioner that by concluding its meetings on March 7, respondent's MBOR failed to comply...

The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's order terminating his parental rights to the children pursuant to his voluntary release of parental rights under the Adoption Code. In 2015, he testified that he wanted to release his parental rights...

The parties entered into a purchase agreement for the defendants to sell the plaintiffs a parcel of land in exchange for $101,000 and a 1950 pickup truck. The trial court found that defendants wrongfully retained possession of the truck after the...

The parties raised several issues as to whether certain property was separate property or marital property subject to division. The defendant-ex-wife argued that her premarital Gentex stock was erroneously classified as marital property. The trial...

Defendant-father did not challenge the trial court's findings as to factors (d) and (e). As to (a), he took "issue with plaintiff's relinquishment of her current employment" in Michigan "for uncertain employment in Texas. While this is a concern,"...

She was convicted of possession with intent to deliver less than 50 grams of cocaine, possession of morphine, and two counts of felony-firearm. The trial court denied her motion to quash the search warrant, suppress the evidence seized, and dismiss...

She argued on appeal that there was insufficient evidence to support a statutory ground for termination due to the failure to offer her services and parenting time. The DHHS "sought termination at the initial dispositional hearing." Thus, it was...

The plaintiff-ex-wife filed a motion to hold defendant in contempt for violating the mutual restraining order by emailing a bank in India, which managed the account plaintiff used to pay her employees, directing it to stop "any kind of outgoing...

James died intestate 2012. He was survived by his spouse, appellee-Maggie, and 10 children. These consolidated appeals involved a dispute over the assets remaining in his estate. The primary issue in Docket No. 323387 concerned whether Maggie, who...

At the time of his death, Lyle was living with a woman with whom he had a long-term extramarital affair. The court agreed that "the phrase '[w]as willfully absent,' as used in MCL 700.2801(2)(e)(i), refers to physical absence." The physical...

The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's award of costs and attorney fees, but vacated the $100 fine. A support review resulted in a reduction of plaintiff's monthly support obligation. Defendant filed an objection to the support...

Defendant and the plaintiff-mother are the parents of an eight-year-old girl. The trial court awarded sole physical custody of the child to defendant with 6 hours of supervised parenting time per week to plaintiff, dependent on her psychological...

The court affirmed the trial court's judgment in favor of plaintiff, which enjoined defendants from using the well and waterline at issue, and awarded plaintiff $186.04 in costs. The case involved a property dispute arising from defendants' use of...

Thus, it affirmed the trial court's orders denying their motions to dismiss and preventing them from raising the defense. The trial court found Bylsma "failed to establish that he was entitled to immunity under § 4, and because his entitlement to...

It noted that the fact "the parties are separated when an asset is received does not change the general rule that an asset earned during the marriage is part of the marital estate." Since the release agreement defendant executed with her former...

Decedent wrote out a will while waiting at his lawyer's office, and the lawyer's secretary notarized it. He later committed suicide. The police officers investigating the matter turned over the letter and a copy of the will to the appellant and...

The trial court terminated her parental rights under § (g) after finding that she physically abused the children throughout the proceedings and that further services would not cure the problem. The record reflected that in 6/13, when "AW was about...

The children were removed from her care in 2013 "based on various allegations relating to the deplorable conditions" of the home, the "lack of education being provided to the children," and her "failure to adequately address her mental-health...

Defendant argued that the trial court should have dismissed plaintiff's remaining claims-unjust enrichment, implied contract/quasi-contract, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty-under MCR 2.116(C)(10) because of the express terms of the LCC...

He was convicted of possession with intent to deliver less than five kilograms of marijuana, and felony-firearm. The court rejected his argument that the jury's verdicts were against the great weight of the evidence. As for his possession with...

It rejected the father's argument that the trial court erred by not holding the DHHS in contempt for failing to provide him with free therapy. It noted there was "no indication that the caseworker willfully defied the court's order to provide...

It rejected her claim that the DHHS failed to obtain a workbook recommended by a doctor following her psychological evaluation, noting that "ample efforts" were made by the caseworkers to obtain it, and that respondent was worked with on the issues...

The parties were married, but had no children. The child was conceived out of an affair between plaintiff and another woman. The child eventually came to live with plaintiff and defendant, but they eventually divorced. Defendant sought custody and...

The case arose out of a guardianship dispute between the minor wards' grandmothers, which arose following the entry of a consent judgment in an earlier Canadian proceeding. On appeal, Bibi argued that the probate and circuit courts erred in...

It was undisputed that, at the start of both residency periods, neither party was physically located in Michigan. "However, a party's 'continuing physical presence' in the state or county for the entirety of the state and county residency periods...

The Sixth Circuit Court rejected Walker's argument that he was entitled to rely on Alabama's self-defense law because he "admitted that he violated the terms of his supervised release by 'committ[ing] a state law violation[.]'" Once he...

In 5/14, the trial court ordered him to comply with a PAA. At the first review hearing in 7/14, he "admitted to relapsing into drug use and tested positive for cocaine." The trial court warned him that his "parental rights would be terminated if he...

Respondent's sole argument on appeal was that she has a constitutional right to parent her child. Although she was generally correct that "parents have a fundamental right to parent their children," the trial court did not err in terminating her...

Plaintiffs sought a declaration that the agreement with defendant was a binding contract, and that defendant breached it as well as the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. On appeal, the court rejected plaintiffs' argument that the...

Thus, the court affirmed his convictions. However, as to his sentencing, it remanded for Crosbyproceedings pursuant to Lockridge. He was sentenced to concurrent prison terms of 15 to 30 years for the murder conviction and 7 to 15 years for the...

The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's orders denying appellant-Ellis's (mother) motions, and remanded the case to the trial court for clarification of the validity of the agreements. It also reversed the trial court's award of $750 in...

As to § (c)(i), more than 182 days elapsed between the issuance of the initial disposition order and the termination decision, and the conditions that led to adjudication, namely her mental health problems, her failure to obtain adequate housing,...

He was convicted of carjacking, armed robbery, unlawful imprisonment, felonious assault, CCW, FIP, felony-firearm, and fourth-degree child abuse related to the carjacking and robbery of a cab driver (S). Defendant argued that S was exposed to an...

Thus, it reversed and remanded for entry of an order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant. The case arose out of plaintiff's claim for PIP benefits-under a no-fault policy issued by defendant to plaintiff's purported "relative,"...

Thus, the court affirmed the trial court's order granting summary disposition in favor of defendants. The case concerned the ownership of a rectangular strip of land or lot referred to as the "fire-lane" that runs through part of a platted...

They argued that the DHHS did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that they failed to provide proper care or custody for the child and that there was no reasonable expectation that they would be able to do so within a reasonable time...

The parties entered into a consent JOD that covered custody and property division. It also reserved the issue of spousal support "until the expiration of four years from the date of entry of this Judgment of Divorce." Defendant later moved for...

Otto and Margaret signed trust documents in 1993. They amended the trust the next year. Otto died in 2005. In 2011, "Margaret attempted to amend the trust to provide that, on the death of the surviving spouse," a piece of real property would go to...

The parties were engaged in a long-standing dispute over natural drainage of water from defendants' higher elevation property across plaintiffs' lot. Plaintiffs moved their septic field and built a berm near the property line that caused water to...

Although Kayko worked fewer hours and had more opportunity to tend to KKG "on a daily basis, this did not negate that Govitz equally loved his son and could care for him." Accordingly, the evidence did not preponderate against the trial court's...

The defendant (ex-wife) claimed the funds were subsequently used to purchase the marital home. She did not dispute, and the record confirmed, that the property was initially plaintiff's separate property. He purchased the property in 1975 and made...

The case arose from a long-simmering disagreement between the father and his son as to a 10-acre parcel of property. On appeal, defendants argued that the trial court erred in granting the father's motion for summary disposition and abused its...

Respondent contended that the trial court erred by receiving the expert testimony of Dr. C, because the DHHS failed to specifically designate her as an expert on its witness list. She also asserted that C's testimony did not satisfy the...

In 2012, plaintiff's then-wife filed for divorce and paid $230 in filing fees. He later filed a motion as to custody of his child in the divorce action, and paid an $80 FOC fee, collected by the clerk of the court pursuant to the former MCL...

On appeal, defendant argued that the trial court committed clear legal error and violated her Second Amendment right by punishing her for lawful possession of a firearm in its analysis for best-interest factor (l). However, the trial court did not...

Plaintiff filed a paternity action claiming defendant was the father of her child. He was eventually served, but claimed the trial court lacked jurisdiction. The trial court disagreed and ordered a paternity test. When he failed to comply, it...

J had two daughters, the petitioner-Kathy Crowder and intervenor-Nancy Baruzzini, and a brother, intervenor-Jack Donaldson, the husband of the respondent-Veronica Donaldson. The will specifically and explicitly disinherited Nancy and Kathy, and...

She claimed that the trial court erred in adjudicating her as unfit. The trial court erred in finding that jurisdiction was established under MCL 712A.2(b)(2) by a preponderance of the evidence. "Under this statute, jurisdiction may be taken over a...

Thus, the court affirmed the trial court's order granting spousal support in favor of the defendant-ex-wife for $2,451 per month. On appeal, the plaintiff-ex-husband argued that the trial court erroneously calculated the parties' respective...

Defendant was arguing with his wife on the side of the road when two men pulled over. As the situation escalated, one of the men allegedly began choking defendant. Defendant pulled out a utility knife and held it in the air. The men got back in...

The evidence showed "that the child had resided with plaintiff her entire life, apart from the time spent in defendant's care." Plaintiff testified that she earned a steady income and resided "in a home where the child has her own bedroom....

Kenneth Koehler passed away with no will, no spouse, no children, and no siblings, and his parents and grandparents predeceased him. His paternal grandfather, Carl Cedric Umble, was killed before his son, Carl Koehler (Kenneth's father) was born....

The relevant question was whether respondents "were afforded notice that satisfies due process, not whether petitioner met each provision and requirement of the GPTA." They claimed that because respondent-RFA's "mortgage was recorded before the...

The court rejected plaintiff's argument that the award of spousal support was unfair and inequitable under the circumstances. "Although the trial court imputed $35,000 to defendant in annual income," he was unemployed and needed "to secure and...

The trial court properly granted summary disposition in defendants' favor. Plaintiff-Janie Burnham (Burnham) slipped and fell in a puddle of water in what the parties describe as the "pit" area of defendant-Hobby Lobby's store. On appeal,...

During their marriage, John designated Nancy as his sole named beneficiary on the group life insurance policy provided by his employer. The divorce judgment included a provision for cancellation of each spouse's interest in any existing life...

"The hearing referee who conducted the adjudication trial stated that it was 'enter[ing] a default' against respondent because he failed to appear for the trial." However, there was "no authority for the proposition that a respondent in child...

Holding that the order failed to appreciate that the shift in parenting time altered the child's ECE, the court reversed the trial court's order and remanded. The order determined the parties' minor child, MS, would attend a particular school and...

Holding that the noncompetition clause in the plaintiff-employer's employee handbook was unreasonable, the court limited the injunction against "'obtaining employment, either directly or indirectly, from any current or previously contracted client...

The court held that the trial court did not err by granting summary disposition for the defendant-property owner in the plaintiff's premises liability action because "the uneven pavement and dim lighting were open and obvious conditions that were...

The court affirmed the district court's judgment denying the defendant-police officer's (Officer Flake) defense of qualified immunity on the plaintiffs' claims of excessive force and arrest without probable cause. It dismissed defendant-City of...

The court held that when "¶ 4.B of the 2010 MOU is read in its entirety, the paragraph is unambiguous and it does not create the vested right asserted by" plaintiff/counter-defendant-Cass. This was a breach of contract action involving a contract...

Holding that the plaintiff-city's noise ordinance was unconstitutionally vague, the court reversed and remanded for dismissal of the citations against the defendants-bar owners and employee. Defendants were issued the citations on the ground that...

The court held that the trial court applied the correct standard of review in granting the defendant-snow removal company summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(8), and correctly determined that the plaintiffs were not entitled to relief under a...

Holding that genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether the option to purchase was specifically assigned and whether it was for the land or the land and the restaurant on the property, the court reversed the trial court's grant of...

The trial court properly granted termination of the respondents-parents' parental rights to the child where the statutory grounds for termination were established by clear and convincing evidence and it was in the child's best interests. They...

The court reversed the trial court's grant of summary disposition in favor of defendants on plaintiff's breach of contract claim, and remanded for entry of summary disposition in favor of plaintiff on that claim. It affirmed the trial court's grant...

There was sufficient evidence to convict defendant-Thomasine Robinson, a mayoral candidate in the 2012 election, of "vote buying" where a witness testified that Thomasine Robinson gave her $20 to vote in the election. There was also evidence that...

Noting that the petitioner's brief made no effort to address the trial court's ruling deeming admitted the respondent-trustee's requests to admit, and concluding that summary disposition for respondent was appropriate under MCR 2.116(C)(10), the...

The court held that the trial court did not err by dismissing the plaintiff-landowner's complaint related to the defendant-neighboring landowner's fence and granting summary disposition to defendant. It also found that the trial court did not err...

The case "had been pending for well over 182 days and was initiated" in 11/12 "because of respondent's mental health, improper supervision of the child, and inadequate housing. The goals identified for respondent through these proceedings included"...

On appeal, the court rejected her argument that the trial court erred in finding statutory grounds for termination. As to § (c)(i) it noted that given her involvement in domestic violence and her lack of progress, "there was no reasonable...

The petitioners were the child's grandparents and had a guardianship over him. They presented evidence that "respondent had not had any contact with her son" since 4/13, "after she left him with them and went back to Iowa." While she "testified...

The Court of Appeals rejected the respondent's claim that laches barred the petition, and concluded that she failed to establish plain error affecting her substantial rights as to her claims of lack of notice and a hearing. Further, she failed to...

The trial court previously granted the parties joint legal and physical custody of their children with equal and shared authority as to all major decisions affecting them, including schooling. It later amended the order, modifying physical custody...

The parties divorced in 2012. On appeal, plaintiff argued that the trial court erred in ruling that the spousal support award was nonmodifiable. The consent judgment included a modification clause. There was nothing in the modification clause that...

The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's order granting defendant summary disposition and remanded for further proceedings. In 2013, the then-63-year-old plaintiff was riding her bicycle when she was struck by defendant-Solomon's vehicle....

The case stemmed from the death of the 16-month-old child of respondent's girlfriend. The child suffered multiple injuries while in his care, and the death was ruled a homicide. A petition was filed to terminate his parental rights to his two...

The parties participated in mediation and memorialized the terms of their agreement in a handwritten mediation agreement that they and their attorneys signed. The plaintiff-father's attorney then drafted the appropriate order, circulated it for...

The court concluded that she "clearly failed to provide proper care and custody for the two-year old child. The child was found wandering in the parking lot of a motel where respondent went to a party; respondent was unconscious from a heroin...

Plaintiff alleged that defendant's secret baptism of the child and concealment of the baptism was in violation of their divorce judgment, which required their parent coordinator to decide disagreements in the event they could not agree. The trial...

Respondent-mother argued that BB's life was not improved by the termination of her parental rights when adoption was not a consideration for him. She stated that her relationship with him "could have been legally maintained while preserving his...

Plaintiff engaged in protected activity and was suspended from employment with full pay and benefits on 10/1/13. She was notified on 10/14/13 that her contract, expiring on 12/1/13, would not be renewed. The court rejected her argument that not...

The trial court terminated respondent's parental rights on the basis of his convictions for sexually molesting his stepdaughter. On appeal, the court rejected his argument that his due process rights were violated when the DHHS failed to provide...

The trial court did not err in rejecting defendants' claim that plaintiff lacked standing in this breach of contract case. It also did not err in ruling that the Authorization was an enforceable contract, or abuse its discretion in denying...

The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by granting the plaintiff-mother's motion to change the domicile of the parties' child from Michigan to Massachusetts. On appeal, the court rejected the defendant-father's argument...

The court held that the appellant waived the affirmative defense of the statute of limitations. Further, it concluded that the probate court did not clearly err in its factual findings that the assets appellant transferred to herself were not gifts...

Noting that the requirement of a loan modification process only applies to foreclosure by advertisement, the court rejected the defendant-borrower's argument that once the plaintiff started the loan modification process, it was barred from...

The court held that the trial court properly denied the plaintiff-condominium association's motion for summary disposition and properly granted the defendant-property owner's motion for summary disposition. Plaintiff sued defendant seeking to...

The court held that the Court of Claims did not err by granting the defendant-university's motion for summary disposition on the basis that the plaintiff's claims were barred by res judicata. The court noted that plaintiff's state claims were "a...

The court held that the trial court did not clearly err when it found that the DHHS established grounds for terminating the respondent-father's parental rights by clear and convincing evidence or when it found that termination of both...

The court held that the plaintiffs lacked standing to set aside the foreclosure sale, and concluded that even if they had standing, they failed to show a genuine issue of material fact as to the essential elements of a claim to set aside the sale....

The court concluded that the trial court properly found proper cause and a change in circumstances warranting reconsideration of the custodial arrangement. Further, its findings on the challenged MCL 722.23 factors were not against the great weight...

The court concluded that the trial court properly found proper cause and a change in circumstances warranting reconsideration of the custodial arrangement. Further, its findings on the challenged MCL 722.23 factors were not against the great weight...

Holding that the probate court erred in finding that the petitioner-PR's claim against the estate for reimbursement of attendant care services she provided to the decedent before his death was not barred, the court reversed and remanded. After her...

In these consolidated medical-marijuana cases, the trial court erred by dismissing the charges against the defendants based on "entrapment." The defendants were charged with dispensing marijuana to individuals with whom they were not connected...

The trial court properly denied in part the defendant-road commission's motion for summary disposition premised on governmental immunity where the plaintiffs-homeowners stated a claim under the "sewage disposal system event exception," and...

The court held that the trial court did not err by granting summary disposition for the defendant-broadcasting company (MSNBC) on the plaintiff's defamation and related claims. It also held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by...

While the trial court did not err in finding that the initial police report was exempt from disclosure at the time the plaintiff made his FOIA request, it abused its discretion in denying his motion for attorney fees after it found that the...

The court held that the trial court did not err by granting plaintiffs-property owners summary disposition and declaring void the defendants-townships' (Haring and Clam Lake) agreement to conditionally transfer property. Plaintiffs sought to annex...

The trial court did not err by refusing to admit an Instagram photo of the victim (Harris) with a gun tucked inside the waistband of his pants because the photo was not relevant to the defendants' theory that Harris was shot during a drug deal....

Holding that the respondent-father did not establish good cause to stay the adoption proceeding, the court concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion. Further, because the trial court's findings on the best...

Holding that the issue of grandparent visitation was not properly before the trial court, and agreeing with the plaintiff-mother that when taken as a whole, on this record, the factors "strongly predominate against" any grant of visitation, the...

Holding that the plaintiff's reliance on MCL 565.29 was misplaced and that MCL 600.3241a had no relationship to the case, the court affirmed the trial court's order granting the defendants summary disposition in this action arising from a...

Holding that the trial court erred in excluding as hearsay an alleged conversation between a member of the decedent's family and an unnamed employee of defendant-New Horizons Rehabilitation Services, and that this testimony established a genuine...

The trial court properly terminated the respondent-mother's parental rights to the two children where the statutory grounds for termination were established by clear and convincing evidence and termination was in their best interests. The initial...

The court held that there was no due process violation and that the unpreserved error in the assignment of the case to a different judge at the second PE did not affect the outcome of the proceedings. Also, defendant failed to establish a plain...

The court held that the trial court did not err by granting summary disposition for the defendants-bank and buyer in the plaintiffs-lessees' action to enforce a right of first refusal to purchase the leased property. The bank initiated foreclosure...

Holding that the trial court clearly erred in finding that there was mutual assent to modify the land contract at issue to waive interest, and erred as a matter of law in ruling that the modification complied with the statute of frauds, the court...

The court found no error in the trial court's order suspending the defendant-mother's legal custody and parenting time. Thus, it affirmed the trial court's order which, among other things, temporarily suspended her legal custody and parenting time...

Rejecting the plaintiff-husband's claim that the trial court, on remand, again failed to make sufficient factual findings to support its attorney fee award to the defendant-wife, the court affirmed the award. The court held in the prior appeal that...

Holding that the plaintiff, pursuant to Obergefell, was not barred from asserting the applicability of the equitable parent doctrine, the court reversed the trial court's order granting the defendant summary disposition and remanded the case to the...

The court held that the trial court properly granted the plaintiff-father's request for a change of domicile, changing physical custody and parenting time of the parties' minor children. However, it did not properly resolve the issues of the...

he trial court did not violate the defendant-Association's due process rights when it sua sponte decided to construe the plattors' intent. However, upon review of the plat and the plat survey, the court held that the trial court erred in finding...

The court held that the trial court did not err by denying the defendant-city's motion for summary disposition based on governmental immunity.The plaintiff sued defendant for injuries she sustained when she tripped and fell on a sidewalk while...

Holding that the trial court erred by granting the plaintiffs-insurance companies' request to re-open the case and impose sanctions against the defendant-contractor's (Sebold) attorney, the court vacated and remanded. Plaintiffs paid claims...

Agreeing with the defendant that the trial court erred in imposing a $500 fine at sentencing when it was not part of the sentencing agreement, the court remanded for the trial court to correct the judgment of sentence by deleting the fine. It...

Concluding that the trial court did not comply with the procedures and requirements set forth in MCL 722.27b, which constituted clear legal error, the court vacated the order for grandparenting time and remanded for the dismissal of the...

Because there was sufficient evidence to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the child (Kate) died as a result of criminal agency, the district court abused its discretion by refusing to bind the defendant over on the charge of open...

The court held that the trial court erred in treating the scope of a Disclaimer as a question that remained open on remand, that it departed from the law of the case, and that it clearly erred in finding clear and convincing evidence that...

Holding that the plaintiff-appellant failed to show that the release language in the real estate purchase agreement was invalid, the court affirmed the trial court's order granting the defendants-real estate agents and agency summary disposition on...

The trial court did not clearly err by interpreting the parties' divorce consent agreement as requiring that they equally divide their 2012 tax refund. The defendant-husband represented to the trial court and to the plaintiff-wife that their 2012...

Holding that the trial court properly granted the plaintiff summary disposition because the only alleged consideration for the modification of the parties' agreement fell within the preexisting duty rule and thus, could not be adequate...

The court held that the trial did not abuse its discretion by awarding the plaintiff-ex-wife 75% of her attorney fees incurred in the trial court proceedings, or by finding she could bear 25% of the costs, and the defendant-ex-husband 75%, as to...

Where the plaintiff sued defendant-HSBC Mortgage Services in an attempt to stop HSBC from foreclosing on his property, he could not rely on an LMA to give him a contractual right to an extension of his decreased monthly payment requirements. HSBC...

The court held that the trial court did not err by granting summary disposition for the defendant in this action involving an easement across the plaintiff-trustee's property. Plaintiff's predecessor-in-interest executed a land contract in 1970,...

Holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant's motion for a mistrial based on a witness's "unresponsive, volunteered answer" to a proper question, the court affirmed his AWIGBH conviction. It also concluded...

The court concluded that even if the trial court erred in finding untimely the defendant-property owner's objection to the plaintiff-city's proposed final amended default judgment, the error was harmless given that his objection was an attempt to...

The circuit court abused its discretion when it dismissed as untimely the plaintiff's appeal as of right from defendant-Peninsula Township Zoning Board of Appeals' decisions regarding requested dimensional variances (Count I) because the circuit...

The trial court properly suppressed the 15-year-old's confession to attempted murder after finding that she "did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive her constitutional rights." The trial court viewed the videotaped interrogation. On...

The trial court did not err when it denied plaintiff-SPE's motion for partial summary disposition on its contract claim because the language in the parties' building contract was ambiguous, and there was evidence to show that the builder,...

The court concluded that the plaintiffs failed to provide any admissible evidence to sufficiently counter the defendants' evidence that they electronically signed the contract for home inspection services, and that the plaintiffs' breach of...

Holding that MCL 554.139 did not apply where the plaintiff was the co-owner of a unit in the condo development, and that he was neither a licensee nor an invitee, the court concluded that he was not owed any duty by the defendants under premises...

The court held that the plaintiff-bank's (Capital One) foreclosure claim survived the parties' case evaluation acceptance and thus, the trial court did not err in considering Capital One's summary disposition motion following the evaluation award....

The court held that the trial court properly terminated the respondent-mother's parental rights to the children where at least one statutory ground for termination existed and it was in the children's best interests. The trial court terminated...

The court reversed the district court's ruling that the six-year statute of limitations had run on the plaintiffs' action to enjoin the U.S. Forest Service from enforcing its "no gas-powered motorboat" restrictions on the lake on which they owned...

The court held that the trial court properly found that the reason for setting aside its original order revoking an affidavit of parentage executed by the mother (Johnson) and her then significant other (Young) did not fall under MCR 2.612(C)(1)(a)...

The trial court properly granted summary disposition to the defendant in this foreclosure of an undeveloped parcel. Defendant "initiated foreclosure by advertisement in early 2012, and conducted the sheriff's sale in March of that year." In June,...

Where the plaintiffs sued Kentucky and defendant-Sunrise, a child-care facility, for allegedly violating the Establishment Clause, the district court erred by finding that its dismissal order in the case was not a consent decree and by ruling that...

The court concluded that the absence of hazing did not preclude defendants-AKA and Nelson (an AKA regional director) from withdrawing plaintiff's membership rights pending an investigation. Further, their promise to conduct a fair investigation...

The trial court acted correctly when it prevented defendant-White from suggesting to the jury that plaintiff-Associated Construction was obligated to investigate his assertions that he could pay for the renovation project. Thus, the court affirmed...

Based on the binding precedent of Powers, the court reversed the trial court's order granting the appellees' summary disposition motion and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings. They contested the decedent's trust and will...

The court affirmed in part and reversed in part an order granting summary disposition in favor of respondents-Oakland County, the OCWRC, and the county's Water Resource Commissioner in this petition for writ of certiorari challenging the...

Neither the "domestic-relations" nor the "probate exception" to federal diversity jurisdiction barred plaintiff-Chevalier from bringing tort and contract claims against her former spouse to recover on a series of unpaid loans. The...

Holding that the circuit court erred by reversing the district court's judgment of possession entered in favor of the plaintiff-bank and remanding this matter to the district court for an eviction trial, the court reversed the circuit court and...

Agreeing with the defendant that "the trial court failed to engage in a meaningful assessment as to the knowing, intelligent, and voluntary nature" of his waiver of counsel, the court reversed his aggravated stalking conviction and remanded for a...

Concluding that the alleged agreement was not a valid contract, primarily due to a lack of consideration and mutuality of obligation, the court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the plaintiff's claims based on the alleged agreement....

The court held that the trial court did not err in finding the cross-defendants-Trajcevski entities (Trajcevski) liable for certain royalties under a land contract and awarding treble damages and attorney fees. Plaintiffs sued the defendants-Furgal...

Concluding that the alleged loan modification was oral, the court held that the trial court properly granted summary disposition in plaintiff-Comerica Bank's favor. Comerica sued defendants-Cheryl Maniaci and her company, Prickles, "seeking full...

Holding that the Court of Appeals properly found that MCL 339.2412(1) was inapplicable, but erred in finding that the contract between the plaintiffs-homeowners and the defendants-unlicensed builder (Willis) was void ab initio, the court affirmed...

The court affirmed the trial court's order compelling the plaintiff to carry out acts necessary to complete the settlement and carry out the refinancing. The appeal arose out of a feud between two brothers, plaintiff and defendant-Terry Yaryan,...

The court held that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant's motion to suppress the results of his hospital blood draw, in instructing the jury on reckless driving causing death, or in scoring his OVs. However, it was unclear whether...

The district court erred by dismissing the plaintiffs-alleged gang members' (the "Juggalos'") constitutional claims based on lack of standing where they claimed they suffered violations of their constitutional rights at the hands of state and local...

Holding that the trial court correctly determined that plaintiff's policy fell under § 2827 and thus, the defendant-insurer was "required to remit the policy limits to plaintiff without regard to whether the structure was actually repaired or...

The court vacated the trial court's order awarding confinement expenses to the extent it required the defendant-father to reimburse the plaintiff-mother for out of network costs, and remanded the matter to the trial court to determine whether the...

The court held that the trial court did not err by granting the defendant-county's motion for summary disposition and quieting title in favor of the defendant-management company (PJM) or by dismissing the plaintiffs' case as to all defendants. The...

Holding that the trial court did not clearly err in finding that termination of the respondent-father's parental rights was proper under § (g) and that termination was in the child's best interests, the court affirmed the order terminating his...

The court held that the FOC referee erred by changing primary physical custody of the child from the plaintiff-mother to the defendant-father because her order was issued and entered in violation of multiple procedural rules and substantive...

Holding that plaintiff-Auto-Owners did not waive its right to rescind or void the policy, and that it was entitled to rescind the policy even if the misrepresentations were innocent, the court affirmed summary disposition for Auto-Owners. However,...

Because it was "definitely and firmly convinced that the probate court erred" in finding that the evidence satisfied the criteria for a conservatorship to be appropriate under MCL 700.5401(3), the court reversed the order establishing a...

Holding that the plaintiff-LLC lacked statutory standing to challenge the results of the zoning referendum election under MCL 600.4545 because it was not a citizen of the county, the court reversed the trial court's order denying the intervening...

The court held that the trial court properly terminated the respondent-mother's parental rights to the child where at least one statutory ground for termination existed and it was in the child's best interests. The trial court terminated...

The court affirmed the trial court's judgment of no cause of action, entered after a bench trial, where plaintiffs alleged that defendants committed negligent misrepresentation during the course of a real estate transaction. Plaintiffs alleged...

The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by entering a judgment of foreclosure and dismissing the defendants-homeowners' (Michael and Beth Dusseau) counterclaims because the parties entered into a binding and enforceable...

Holding that the trial court did not clearly err in finding that § (c)(ii) was established by clear and convincing evidence, or in finding that termination was in the children's best interests, the court affirmed the trial court's order...

The court held that the trial court did not err in ruling for the third-party defendant (Taylor) and her company (the plaintiff), declaring plaintiff the owner of two parcels of land previously owned by the defendants and dismissing their...

The court affirmed the trial court's grant of (1) joint physical custody of the parties' children and (2) mid-week parenting time to plaintiff-Matthew (the father). The parties married in 2000, and had 2 children over the course of their marriage....

Holding that it did not promote the children's best interests to continue their education in a school 14 miles from the home of defendant-Garrison (the father) and 28 miles from the home of plaintiff-Zalewski (the mother), the court reversed the...

The court held that the record sufficiently evidenced the DHS's compliance with the ICWA and MIFPA notice requirements. Also, the trial court did not violate the respondent-father's rights under the MMMA. Finally, he was not denied the effective...

The court reversed and remanded for entry of an order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant-Great Lakes (garnishor). Plaintiff-KBD sued Great Lakes. Great Lakes obtained a favorable verdict that also resulted in an award of costs and...

The court held that the trial court did not err in its division of the parties' marital property, but remanded for further consideration of the defendant-ex-wife's request for attorney fees, spousal support, and health insurance. In the divorce,...

Concluding that the trial court failed to follow the law of the case and the Michigan Supreme Court's remand order, the court held that it also erred in ruling that the defendants had a prescriptive easement allowing them to erect a dock and moor...

The court held that the trial court did not err by awarding the plaintiff-father sole legal and physical custody of the parties' two children, AW and GW. On appeal, the court rejected the defendant-mother's argument that the trial court...

Holding that the plaintiff did not allege a legally cognizable claim to set aside the foreclosure and sheriff's sale, the court affirmed the trial court's order granting defendants-JP Morgan Chase Bank and Fannie Mae summary disposition in this...