Now Accepting New Clients!

CONTRACTS 12: The court held joint venture agreement was a valid oral agreement.

This action involves an alleged joint venture agreement between plaintiff, defendant, and non-party R with regard to commercial real property in Detroit.

Quitclaim Deed

Plaintiff learned from a friend that a large commercial property in Detroit was for sale for $20,000. According to plaintiff, he talked to defendant and R about purchasing the property and they discussed possible uses. Plaintiff considered leasing the property as a warehouse for his own business and they also discussed using it as a location for a medical-marijuana facility.

Plaintiff explained that the three of them decided to purchase the property and jointly operate or sell it for a profit. He contributed $5,000 toward the purchase price, and defendant and R each contributed $7,500. They were each to have a one third interest. Plaintiff testified that although he contributed less cash, he was to receive an equal share because he found the property. At the time of the purchase, the seller executed a quitclaim deed conveying the property to defendant only.

According to plaintiff, their plan was to have the property held by a new entity in which they would each have a one-third interest, but the entity had not been organized at the time the property was purchased, so the property was placed solely in defendant’s name, with the intent of transferring ownership to the new entity after it was formed. R later sold his interest to defendant, giving defendant a two-thirds interest.

Plaintiff explained that they wanted defendant involved in the project because he had experience rehabilitating and remodeling properties. Per plaintiff’s testimony, it was expected that defendant would initially assume the cost of securing and rehabilitating the property, but plaintiff acknowledged that he would remain liable for one-third of the expenses. Soon after the property was purchased, defendant performed work to secure, clean, and repair it. Defendant estimated that he spent about $30,000.

Operating Agreement

Plaintiff prepared documents, including a proposed operating agreement, for the formation of a new entity that would hold title to the property. However, defendant refused to sign the documents and the parties were unable to work out their differences.

Defendant denied that plaintiff ever acquired any interest in the property. According to defendant, plaintiff was only interested in a business that they might operate at the property, and it was contemplated that plaintiff would receive a one-third interest in that business entity, but not the property.

At the time of trial, defendant had located a buyer who was willing to purchase the property for $265,000.


The court found that the parties’ agreement included that defendant would have the deed in his name. The court did not award plaintiff an interest in the real property itself but ruled only that plaintiff had a one-third interest in the joint venture that pertained to the operation, development, or ultimate sale of the property.

The trial court found that the parties had formed an agreement for a joint venture to own the subject property and form a business. The court held that the joint venture agreement was valid as an oral agreement. The court found that upon a sale of the property, plaintiff was entitled to one-third of the net sales proceeds, less $30,000 in expenses already advanced by defendant.

Business Formation

Aldrich Legal Services lawyers serve clients throughout southeast Michigan who are interested in starting businesses. Our attorneys and staff can assist you with all legal work while you focus getting your business up and running.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Speak to a Pro: (734) 404-3000

FAMILY LAW 50: A Michigan Court has jurisdiction to make an initial custody determination when it is the home state of the child on the date of the commencement of the proceeding or within 6 months before the commencement of the proceeding.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY  Plaintiff and defendant have twin sons, but never married.  On August 13, 2008, the Court of Common Pleas Juvenile Division in Montgomery County, Ohio established plaintiff as the legal father of the children and...

When You Should Contest a Will?

Wills usually go through without a problem. Well over 90% of wills have no issue making it through probate. However, there are several grounds you may have to contest a will. As a beneficiary, or someone who would gain from a will, there are legal...

What You Need to Know About Distracted Driving

A great U.S. freedom is the ability to drive the open roads. However, every year there are more than 20,000 car accidents in Michigan. Many of these accidents come from distracted driving and could have been avoided. Distracted driving is such a...

Reasons Your Will or Trust Could be Contested

Everyone reacts in their own way when a family member passes away. Emotions can run high, and people can react more strongly than they normally would. Some family members may feel cheated by what a will or trust grants them leading them to contest...

Penalties For Driving Without Insurance in Michigan

Getting into a car and going for a drive isn’t perfectly safe. Driving on the Michigan roads can be dangerous. Driving those same roads becomes financially dangerous if you drive without car insurance. Between fees, charges, and possible...

PROBATE 36: Undue influence to execute Lady Bird deed.

This probate dispute between siblings arises out of the death of their father. Their father lived alone. In 2013, however, he asked appellee to live with him. She agreed, moving into the home in August 2013. Appellants allege that in the years...

Top 5 Most Common Traffic Violations in Michigan

Staying safe on the roads is in everyone’s best interest. However, keeping yourself or others out of danger is everyone’s responsibility. Getting a traffic ticket ends up costing drivers big time. Traffic tickets and citations cost money...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000