DIVORCE 20: Plaintiff asserts that defendant’s motions to purge her contempt were frivolous.

Plaintiff filed for divorce in August 2007 and a Judgment of Divorce (JOD) granting the parties joint legal and joint physical custody of their two minor children was entered in December 2007.

Things were amicable between the parties for a while, but at some point plaintiff became concerned that the children were being exposed to domestic violence and alcohol abuse in the defendant’s home she shared with her new husband.

Plaintiff subsequently filed a Motion Regarding Custody and Parenting Time. On December 12, 2013, the trial court issued an order granting defendant’s motion to appoint a therapist for evaluation, review and recommendation as to any parenting time and custodial issues.

On April 4, 2014, plaintiff filed a Motion for an Order to Show Cause for Contempt for defendant’s failure to follow the December 2013 order and requested $2400 in attorney fees.

In a subsequent order, the court awarded plaintiff full legal and physical custody of the children. Defendant was advised that she could petition the court for a custody hearing and additional parenting time upon demonstrating that she had fully addressed the issues identified in the therapist’s report.

In October 2014, defendant filed her first Motion to Restore Joint Legal Custody, Modify Parenting Time and No Contact Provision, and Purge Contempt arguing she had fully complied with the issues identified by the therapist.

At a March 2015 hearing the court inquired into defendant’s progress. Based on admissions made by defendant, the court found she was not in full compliance because she was not in counseling at that time.

Thereafter, defendant continued to file motions to modify custody & parenting time arguing her and her husband’s compliance with the therapist’s recommendations. Each time plaintiff responded with assertions that defendant and her husband were not in compliance. Plaintiff likewise continued to file motions requesting evidentiary hearings regarding his unresolved complaints for litigation costs and contempt sanctions due to defendant’s non-compliance and unresolved contempt.

Plaintiff asserts that the filing of defendant’s motions to purge her contempt were frivolous because defendant was not in full compliance with the recommendations made by the therapist. However, defendant testified that she was engaged in parenting time alone with the children, was attending Al-Anon and was going to begin individual counseling with a new counselor.

Taking these actions into account, it was not unreasonable for defendant to believe that she and her husband had substantially addressed the court’s order and the therapist’s recommendations at the time she filed the motions. Defendant ultimately not being in full compliance did not make the filing of the motions or the signing of them by defense counsel frivolous. Thus, the trial court did not err when it held that plaintiff failed to show that defendant’s filings were frivolous.

Our family law practice is headed by Brad Aldrich, a knowledgeable divorce lawyer with more than 20 years of legal experience. Our focus is on resolving your dispute as efficiently and cost-effectively as possible, while fully safeguarding your rights.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Top 3 Misconceptions on Power of Attorney

Considering leaving the country for a long time while maintaining a business or selling a home in the US? Were you recently diagnosed with a terminal or degenerative disease? For these and many other issues, it may become necessary for someone...

FAMILY LAW 29: Quitclaim deed signed after prenuptial agreement prevails.

The court ruled that title to the land prevails and that once the deed was signed, the property became the undivided whole interest for both the decedent and appellee and became appellee’s property upon the decedent’s death. Consequently, the court concluded that the prenuptial agreement did not have any impact on the property rights of appellee in this case.

Know the Differences between Annulment and Divorce

  Marriage can end through two ways: divorce and annulment. Though both of these options have the same result, each has different requirements. There are many similarities and differences between a divorce and an annulment, so many...

Understanding Vaping Laws for Minors

  Vaping is a fad that is quickly solidifying into a stable industry of products around the world. Vaping and electronic cigarette (or e-cigarette) use have dramatically increased from roughly “seven million [users] in 2011 to 35...

Michigans New Marijuana Laws

The 2018 ballot initiative titled “the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA) passed with 56% of the vote. Michigan joins nine states and D.C. in legalizing some form of recreational marijuana use.  Due to the...

Cyberbullying Is Now A Punishable Crime In Michigan

Beginning in March 2019, cyberbullying will now be illegal in the state of Michigan. The House Bill 5017 now makes cyberbullying a punishable crime by Michigan law, meaning that those who harass others online could face potential jail...

The Difference Between Theft, Robbery and Burglary

Often, burglary, robbery, and theft are used interchangeably even though there are distinct differences between all of them. Though, what all three do have in common is they may involve the unlawful taking of someone’s personal property by...

Do I Have To Go To Court If I Get A Divorce?

If you’re contemplating a divorce in Michigan, you probably have a lot of questions. One of the most intimidating aspects of getting a divorce in Michigan or anywhere else is the idea of having to appear in court. The laws for getting a...

Do I Need A Prenuptial Agreement?

A prenuptial agreement is not only for the wealthy people in society, like Hollywood celebrities and the like but also for any couple that brings personal assets, property, debts or children from a former relationship into the marriage. This...

PROBATE 19: Respondent argues she did not receive notice of hearing until five days before.

Respondent argues that she was denied her right to due process of law because she did not receive notice of the hearing until five days before it took place. Respondent argues that the five-day notice of hearing violated her right to due process. Due process generally requires that notice be reasonably calculated to apprise interested parties of the action and to provide them an opportunity to be heard.

WILLS/TRUSTS 11: Allegations that a trustee violated his fiduciary duties.

MCL 700.7803 states that a trustee shall act as would a prudent person in dealing with the property of another, including following the standards of the Michigan prudent investor rule. If the trustee has special skills or is named trustee on the basis of representation of special skills or expertise, the trustee is under a duty to use those skills. MCL 700.7810 states that a trustee shall take reasonable steps to take control of and protect the trust property.

How Is Probation Violated?

If you are on probation, it means you have the judge's trust and have been allowed some level of freedom. Now you must work on ensuring you don’t violate your probation. You will need to abide by every term that the criminal court judge...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000