DIVORCE 20: Plaintiff asserts that defendant’s motions to purge her contempt were frivolous.

Plaintiff filed for divorce in August 2007 and a Judgment of Divorce (JOD) granting the parties joint legal and joint physical custody of their two minor children was entered in December 2007.

Things were amicable between the parties for a while, but at some point plaintiff became concerned that the children were being exposed to domestic violence and alcohol abuse in the defendant’s home she shared with her new husband.

Plaintiff subsequently filed a Motion Regarding Custody and Parenting Time. On December 12, 2013, the trial court issued an order granting defendant’s motion to appoint a therapist for evaluation, review and recommendation as to any parenting time and custodial issues.

On April 4, 2014, plaintiff filed a Motion for an Order to Show Cause for Contempt for defendant’s failure to follow the December 2013 order and requested $2400 in attorney fees.

In a subsequent order, the court awarded plaintiff full legal and physical custody of the children. Defendant was advised that she could petition the court for a custody hearing and additional parenting time upon demonstrating that she had fully addressed the issues identified in the therapist’s report.

In October 2014, defendant filed her first Motion to Restore Joint Legal Custody, Modify Parenting Time and No Contact Provision, and Purge Contempt arguing she had fully complied with the issues identified by the therapist.

At a March 2015 hearing the court inquired into defendant’s progress. Based on admissions made by defendant, the court found she was not in full compliance because she was not in counseling at that time.

Thereafter, defendant continued to file motions to modify custody & parenting time arguing her and her husband’s compliance with the therapist’s recommendations. Each time plaintiff responded with assertions that defendant and her husband were not in compliance. Plaintiff likewise continued to file motions requesting evidentiary hearings regarding his unresolved complaints for litigation costs and contempt sanctions due to defendant’s non-compliance and unresolved contempt.

Plaintiff asserts that the filing of defendant’s motions to purge her contempt were frivolous because defendant was not in full compliance with the recommendations made by the therapist. However, defendant testified that she was engaged in parenting time alone with the children, was attending Al-Anon and was going to begin individual counseling with a new counselor.

Taking these actions into account, it was not unreasonable for defendant to believe that she and her husband had substantially addressed the court’s order and the therapist’s recommendations at the time she filed the motions. Defendant ultimately not being in full compliance did not make the filing of the motions or the signing of them by defense counsel frivolous. Thus, the trial court did not err when it held that plaintiff failed to show that defendant’s filings were frivolous.

Our family law practice is headed by Brad Aldrich, a knowledgeable divorce lawyer with more than 20 years of legal experience. Our focus is on resolving your dispute as efficiently and cost-effectively as possible, while fully safeguarding your rights.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

The Difference Between Theft, Robbery and Burglary

Often, burglary, robbery, and theft are used interchangeably even though there are distinct differences between all of them. Though, what all three do have in common is they may involve the unlawful taking of someone’s personal property by...

Do I Have To Go To Court If I Get A Divorce?

If you’re contemplating a divorce in Michigan, you probably have a lot of questions. One of the most intimidating aspects of getting a divorce in Michigan or anywhere else is the idea of having to appear in court. The laws for getting a...

Do I Need A Prenuptial Agreement?

A prenuptial agreement is not only for the wealthy people in society, like Hollywood celebrities and the like but also for any couple that brings personal assets, property, debts or children from a former relationship into the marriage. This...

PROBATE 19: Respondent argues she did not receive notice of hearing until five days before.

Respondent argues that she was denied her right to due process of law because she did not receive notice of the hearing until five days before it took place. Respondent argues that the five-day notice of hearing violated her right to due process. Due process generally requires that notice be reasonably calculated to apprise interested parties of the action and to provide them an opportunity to be heard.

WILLS/TRUSTS 11: Allegations that a trustee violated his fiduciary duties.

MCL 700.7803 states that a trustee shall act as would a prudent person in dealing with the property of another, including following the standards of the Michigan prudent investor rule. If the trustee has special skills or is named trustee on the basis of representation of special skills or expertise, the trustee is under a duty to use those skills. MCL 700.7810 states that a trustee shall take reasonable steps to take control of and protect the trust property.

How Is Probation Violated?

If you are on probation, it means you have the judge's trust and have been allowed some level of freedom. Now you must work on ensuring you don’t violate your probation. You will need to abide by every term that the criminal court judge...

REAL ESTATE 25: Foreclosure and sheriff’s sale, redemption period expired.

In lieu of an answer, defendants filed a motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(8) and (C)(10), arguing essentially that plaintiff lacked standing to bring claims related to the Property because plaintiff’s legal interest in the Property was extinguished through properly conducted foreclosure proceedings and the redemption period had expired and that none of plaintiff’s claims had legal merit.

I Was Arrested- Can I Question The Cop?

There are things that the police wouldn’t want people to know, and this is for the apparent reason that their investigations wouldn’t yield many convictions as they would like. The role of a police officer is to make arrests followed by...

REAL ESTATE 24: Court dismissed defendant’s counterclaim for failure to join third party.

Defendants’ counter-complaint sought a declaration, among other things, that defendants had acquired a legal right to use the Drive as a means to access their property. But defendants did not add the LLC, the owner of the Drive, as a party to their suit. Consequently, the trial court dismissed defendant’s counterclaim for easement rights because of the failure to join LLC—a necessary party.

Can Your Marriage Be Annulled?

An annulment officially erases a marriage. In Michigan, it is harder to get your marriage annulled than it is to get a divorce. The annulment procedure is very similar to the divorce process, and you need filing of the right documents and service...

Estate Planning- What Errors You Should Avoid?

Estate planning is a task financial experts say you should never neglect. Despite this, according to a 2017 survey, 6 in 10 Americans don't have a will. While not doing any estate planning is the biggest mistake of all, here are three...

REAL ESTATE 22: Court found denial of rezoning from multiple-family to commercial invalid.

Plaintiff brought suit, alleging that the rezoning denial deprived it of its constitutional rights to equal protection and substantive due process. The parties filed competing motions for summary disposition. The briefs largely focused on whether defendant had treated the Property differently from other properties in the downtown area and whether it had legitimate reasons for doing so.

FAMILY LAW 24: Plaintiff-mother denied her motion to change parenting time.

The Child Custody Act of 1970, MCL 722.21 authorizes a trial court to issue custody and parenting-time orders that are in the child’s best interests. A showing of proper cause or change of circumstances is required to modify a parenting-time order. The movant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that either proper cause or a change of circumstances exists.

Custody of Pets In A Divorce

Divorce comes with confusion and mixed emotions. The question of who gets custody of pets may be even more confusing- especially since pets can begin to feel like family. Courts often look out for the interest of human children and allow for shared...

PROBATE 14: Trial court found involuntary mental health treatment appropriate.

To receive involuntary mental health treatment under the Mental Health Code, MCL 330.1001, a petitioner is required to establish that respondent has a mental illness and who as a result of that mental illness can reasonably be expected within the near future to intentionally or unintentionally seriously physically injure himself, herself, or another individual, and who has engaged in an act or acts or made significant threats that are substantially supportive of the expectation.

BUSINESS LAW 6: Membership dispute in a LLC.

Based on the testimony, the trial court ordered the dissolution and liquidation of the assets of the LLC. The trial court also directed the LLC to make a distribution to plaintiff, which represented the 49% share owed to him to compensate for defendant’s distribution.

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000