Now Accepting New Clients!

FAMILY LAW 70: Referee found that it was in the best interests of the children for plaintiff to have primary physical custody.

On March 4, 2019, the trial court entered a consent judgment of divorce regarding the parties. The judgment of divorce provided that the parties would each have joint physical and legal custody of all the minor children. The parties were to exercise parenting time on alternating weekends, and each party was to have the minor children for two consecutive days each week.

Modify Parenting Time

On September 3, 2019, plaintiff moved the trial court to modify the parenting time schedule. Following two days of testimony and an in-camera interview of all the children, the referee granted plaintiff’s motions, awarded plaintiff primary physical custody, and modified the parenting time such that defendant, while maintaining his parenting time every other weekend, only had four hours of parenting time on two weekday evenings.

Defendant argued the referee made several factual findings that were against the great weight of the evidence and, as a result, her ultimate finding that a change of custody was in the best interests of the minor children was erroneous.

Change of Circumstance or Proper Cause

Before considering a change of custody, a trial court must find that there has been a change of circumstances or proper cause.

The party moving for the change of custody bears the burden of proving the modification is in the best interests of the child, and the trial court must consider all the statutory best-interest factors set out in MCL 722.23.

Stable Environment

While defendant continued to live in the marital home, he had introduced another woman and her children to the household, and this woman had engaged in criminal activity involving the care of her children. The referee acknowledged there were no allegations that she had abused these minor children, but she found that such activity going on in defendant’s home made it unstable. The record supported the referee’s finding that plaintiff’s home provided more stability to the minor children.

In addition, plaintiff and defendant both testified about the daily routine of the minor children on defendant’s days with the children. Any day that defendant worked, and the children did not have school, they went to plaintiff’s home until defendant got out of work. Plaintiff was able to work from home and make her own schedule while defendant could not, and plaintiff exercised her right of first refusal under the relevant provision in the parties’ judgment of divorce which requires both parties to offer the other party parenting time if he or she will be unable to be present for four or more hours during their scheduled parenting time.

Referee’s Findings and Recommendation

After making the above factual findings, the referee found that it was in the best interests of the minor children for plaintiff to have primary physical custody, while defendant would receive slightly less parenting time.

Experience with Modifications

It is important to remember that decrees regarding child support, child custody, and visitation are not always final. Circumstances change all the time, which is why it is important to have an experienced and understanding attorney by your side at every step of the way.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Speak to a Pro: (734) 404-3000

FAMILY LAW 77: Court awarded plaintiff sole legal custody; defendant was unwilling to work with plaintiff.

For joint custody to work, parents must be able to agree with each other on basic issues in child rearing including health care, religion, education, day to day decision making and discipline and they must be willing to cooperate with each other in joint decision making. If two equally capable parents are unable to cooperate and to agree generally concerning important decisions affecting the welfare of their children, the court has no alternative but to determine which parent shall have sole custody of the children.

CRIMINAL 19: Sentencing guidelines are advisory.

The sentencing guidelines are advisory, and although a trial court must determine the applicable guidelines range and take it into account when imposing a sentence, the court is not required to sentence a defendant within that range.

Basic responsibilities of an executor

Originally posted on 01/11/2017 The emotional toils of dealing with the death of a loved one can be considerably difficult. Nevertheless, perseverance is paramount; especially if you are appointed to be an executor to one’s...

What you need to compliment your will

Originally posted on 02/08/2017 Making end-of-life plans usually end with a will, but they shouldn't. Some believe that simply having a will is enough. However, this post will briefly explain how having other estate planning...

The benefits of home health care providers

Originally posted on 03/22/2017 As we get older or suffer an injury, we need a little extra help. Home health care providers or caregivers can provide the assistance needed to handle your or your loved one's health and safety...

What to know about bail conditions

Originally posted on 03/06/2017 If you have been arrested and are being held on the suspicion that you have committed a particular crime, chances are that the only thing you are thinking about is getting out of jail as soon as possible and...

College students and estate planning

Originally posted on 12/16/2016 With college semesters starting up in Michigan, it may not be so easy to get college students to think responsibly. This time can be especially tough with the need of moving back to school and getting...

Three reasons to put a power of attorney in place

Originally posted on 11/08/2016 While no one wants to think of the unfortunate possibility of being incapacitated or of a time when we can't handle our own affairs, this circumstance is a real possibility. If something happens and this...

How to approach parents about estate planning

Originally posted on 12/09/2016 Family forms a strong foundation for many people's first and most intimate community. It is important to strengthen these first relationships so even uncommon questions become natural. For those...

PROBATE 44: Petition for Mental Health Treatment

Michigan’s Mental Health Code governs the civil admission and discharge procedures for a person with a mental illness. Specifically, MCL 330.1434 sets forth the procedure and content requirements for a petition for mental health treatment.

Should you get your criminal record expunged?

Originally posted on 04/12/2017 If you have been convicted of a crime, have served your sentence, and have followed all court recommendations, you should be able to put your past behind you and move on with life. Moving forward is critical...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000