Now Accepting New Clients!

FAMILY LAW 83: A trial court can terminate a parent’s rights and permit a stepparent to adopt a child.

In this case, Petitioner-mother and respondent-father were married for approximately 4½ years. In 2013, petitioner gave birth to a son, NH. Five months after respondent filed for divorce in 2016, petitioner gave birth to a daughter, EH. The consent judgment of divorce entered March 20, 2017, gave the parties joint legal custody of the children, but awarded petitioner physical custody. The parties agreed to a flexible parenting-time arrangement. Respondent-father was also ordered to pay $220 monthly in child support.

Petition to Terminate Parental Rights

Petitioner met her now-husband, ZT, the same month that the divorce was finalized. The couple moved in together and eventually married. In February 2020, petitioner and ZT asked respondent if he would agree to ZT adopting NH and EH. Respondent refused. A year later, petitioner and ZT filed petitions in the current actions to terminate respondent’s parental rights and to permit ZT to adopt the children.

In their petition, petitioner and ZT alleged that respondent had not provided the financial support required by court order. They further asserted that respondent had not visited, contacted, or communicated with the children in the previous two years.

Evidentiary Hearing

At an evidentiary hearing, respondent admitted that he had not paid child support as ordered. Respondent also admitted that he had not visited with the children during the relevant two-year period from May 6, 2019, to May 6, 2021.

Even had petitioner completely blocked respondent’s access to the children (which the record does not substantiate), respondent still had the ability to visit, contact, or communicate with the children. The divorce judgment gave respondent the right to visit the children according to an alternative schedule in the event the parties could not agree on to reasonable parenting time. Respondent insisted that he did not believe the court could help him as he and petitioner had opted out of the Friend of the Court system.

Terminate Parental Rights

A trial court has discretion to terminate a parent’s rights and permit a stepparent to adopt a child when the conditions of MCL 710.51(6) are met. MCL 710.51(6)(b) requires the petitioner to establish that the other parent had the ability to visit, contact, or communicate with the children, and substantially failed or neglected to do so for a period of two years.

Despite having the ability to visit his children by making even a minimal effort to enforce the divorce judgment or simply by mailing the children presents and cards, respondent last saw his children on February 3, 2019, and last spoke with NH sometime in April 2019. Accordingly, there is no factual dispute that respondent has regularly and substantially failed or neglected to visit, contact, or communicate with his children for the requisite two-year period.

Assistance With Custody

At Aldrich Legal Services, our attorneys represent parents throughout southeast Michigan with a wide range of custody-related matters. We understand how important your relationship with your children is, which is why we will work hard to protect your rights and help you achieve a positive outcome. Schedule a consultation today.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Speak to a Pro: (734) 404-3000

REAL ESTATE 89: RM had not included any language in the deed providing that the property was a joint tenancy with full rights of survivorship, the property instead became a tenancy in common.

RM drafted the deed without seeking counsel and mistakenly believed that, if either she or FK died, the property would fully pass to the surviving tenant. FK’s will provided that if his wife predeceased him—which she did—the personal representative of his estate should sell any residual property that he owned and divide the cash proceeds equally among his surviving children.

PROBATE 53: The trust agreement included an Incontestability Provision.

A settlor’s intent is to be carried out as nearly as possible. Generally, in terrorem clauses are valid and enforceable. However, a provision in a trust that purports to penalize an interested person for contesting the trust or instituting another proceeding relating to the trust shall not be given effect if probable cause exists for instituting a proceeding contesting the trust or another proceeding relating to the trust.

FAMILY LAW 82: Court stated it would terminate the personal protection order (PPO) after the parties present documentation of the initiation of the divorce proceedings.

However, the trial court concluded that these matters should, in fact, be in the province and the jurisdiction of the Family Division and in that respect, having issued a personal protection order, the Court stated it would terminate the personal protection order after the parties present documentation of the initiation of the divorce proceedings.

What to Do When Homeowners Insurance Denies Your Claim

Since 1955, homeowners insurance has helped owners protect their property and belongings against damages and theft. According to the Insurance Information Institute, over 93% of homeowners in the US have homeowners insurance coverage, paying around...

What to Look for in a Criminal Defense Attorney

Originally posted on 10/20/2017 If you are charged with a crime, you could face severe penalties that could include financial fines, public service, or even jail time. For those in the Michigan area, hiring an attorney experienced in...

PROBATE 51: Trust filed a petition to determine title to credit union account.

The probate court explained that the owners of the account are S and J. When S passes, J becomes the owner of the account. J is the one who had the authority to make the designation. Nowhere in any documents is there a designation by J that SJ be the owner -- or the beneficiary of the account. The designation made by his father was no longer binding because he was no longer the owner at the time J passed away.

Invoking Your Right to Remain Silent

Originally posted on 07/19/2017 While the “right to remain silent” represents one of your most inalienable rights, many people have a few misconceptions about how it works. Many people receive their understanding of this...

Arrests made by tracking cell phones may be illegal

Originally posted on 02/10/2017 Law enforcement agencies are always looking for an edge in fighting crime. As cell phones have become an indispensable part of life for many people, authorities have taken to using these devices to track...

Could I lose my job over a drunk driving arrest?

Originally posted on 01/20/2017 When potential clients ask us questions about criminal defense representation (particularly for drunk driving offenses) one of the most common is whether they will lose their job.  Naturally, this...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000