Blog

REAL ESTATE 23: Plaintiff did not have an express easement or prescriptive easement.

Defendant and plaintiff own property adjacent to each other.  No official road borders plaintiff’s property. Plaintiff and her family accessed their parcel via a two-track trail that ran across defendant’s southwest corner of his property, and ended on plaintiff’s property. Multiple witnesses testified that there was no other way to access plaintiff’s property other than the two track. This dispute centers on whether plaintiff and her family hold an easement, express or prescriptive, to traverse over defendant’s southwest property via this two-track.

Plaintiff, her parents, and plaintiff’s siblings utilized their property regularly over the decades. To access their property, they utilized the two-track that ran across defendant’s property. Defendant testified that he gave plaintiff’s brother permission over the years to use the two-track to check in on the property; however, defendant testified that he never gave plaintiff or the other members of her family permission.

In the early 2000s, defendant placed a gate across the two-track, but he gave plaintiff’s brother a key and continued to grant him permission. Finally, in 2016, after finding evidence of strangers and damage on his property, defendant placed another lock on the gate and refused to give plaintiff’s brother another key.  The law suit followed.

In order to create an express easement, there must be language in the writing manifesting a clear intent to create a servitude. In reviewing other deeds in the record, the easement was extinguished, so no express easement could have transferred with the land.

An easement by prescription results from use of another’s property that is open, notorious, adverse, and continuous for a period of fifteen years. The burden is on the party claiming a prescriptive easement to show by satisfactory proof that the use of the defendant’s property was of such a character and continued for such a length of time that it ripened into a prescriptive easement.

While there was testimony to show that plaintiff and her family used the two-track, plaintiff testified that during her first visit to the property, she was unaware of who even owned the two-track. There was no evidence to show or suggest that plaintiff subsequently placed defendant on notice of a claim of use. There was no evidence establishing that plaintiff or her family told defendant that they claimed a right of way. While mere usage would ordinarily be enough to satisfy the adversity requirement, the heightened standards for wild and unenclosed land require more. In this case, the record supports that defendant’s property was wild and unenclosed.  Therefore, plaintiffs did not have a prescriptive easement over defendant’s property.

Are you involved in a real estate dispute in Michigan? Are you seeking an efficient and effective resolution to a property litigation matter? We understand that litigation can be costly and time-consuming. We are focused on helping our clients resolve disputes in the most efficient and cost-effective manner possible, consistent with their objectives.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Top 3 Misconceptions on Power of Attorney

Considering leaving the country for a long time while maintaining a business or selling a home in the US? Were you recently diagnosed with a terminal or degenerative disease? For these and many other issues, it may become necessary for someone...

FAMILY LAW 29: Quitclaim deed signed after prenuptial agreement prevails.

The court ruled that title to the land prevails and that once the deed was signed, the property became the undivided whole interest for both the decedent and appellee and became appellee’s property upon the decedent’s death. Consequently, the court concluded that the prenuptial agreement did not have any impact on the property rights of appellee in this case.

Know the Differences between Annulment and Divorce

  Marriage can end through two ways: divorce and annulment. Though both of these options have the same result, each has different requirements. There are many similarities and differences between a divorce and an annulment, so many...

Understanding Vaping Laws for Minors

  Vaping is a fad that is quickly solidifying into a stable industry of products around the world. Vaping and electronic cigarette (or e-cigarette) use have dramatically increased from roughly “seven million [users] in 2011 to 35...

Michigans New Marijuana Laws

The 2018 ballot initiative titled “the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA) passed with 56% of the vote. Michigan joins nine states and D.C. in legalizing some form of recreational marijuana use.  Due to the...

Cyberbullying Is Now A Punishable Crime In Michigan

Beginning in March 2019, cyberbullying will now be illegal in the state of Michigan. The House Bill 5017 now makes cyberbullying a punishable crime by Michigan law, meaning that those who harass others online could face potential jail...

The Difference Between Theft, Robbery and Burglary

Often, burglary, robbery, and theft are used interchangeably even though there are distinct differences between all of them. Though, what all three do have in common is they may involve the unlawful taking of someone’s personal property by...

Do I Have To Go To Court If I Get A Divorce?

If you’re contemplating a divorce in Michigan, you probably have a lot of questions. One of the most intimidating aspects of getting a divorce in Michigan or anywhere else is the idea of having to appear in court. The laws for getting a...

Do I Need A Prenuptial Agreement?

A prenuptial agreement is not only for the wealthy people in society, like Hollywood celebrities and the like but also for any couple that brings personal assets, property, debts or children from a former relationship into the marriage. This...

PROBATE 19: Respondent argues she did not receive notice of hearing until five days before.

Respondent argues that she was denied her right to due process of law because she did not receive notice of the hearing until five days before it took place. Respondent argues that the five-day notice of hearing violated her right to due process. Due process generally requires that notice be reasonably calculated to apprise interested parties of the action and to provide them an opportunity to be heard.

WILLS/TRUSTS 11: Allegations that a trustee violated his fiduciary duties.

MCL 700.7803 states that a trustee shall act as would a prudent person in dealing with the property of another, including following the standards of the Michigan prudent investor rule. If the trustee has special skills or is named trustee on the basis of representation of special skills or expertise, the trustee is under a duty to use those skills. MCL 700.7810 states that a trustee shall take reasonable steps to take control of and protect the trust property.

How Is Probation Violated?

If you are on probation, it means you have the judge's trust and have been allowed some level of freedom. Now you must work on ensuring you don’t violate your probation. You will need to abide by every term that the criminal court judge...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
consultation
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000