Now Accepting New Clients!
Blog

REAL ESTATE 30: Mortgage invalid because wife did not join her husband in signing it.

In 1979, plaintiff purchased real estate pursuant to a land contract. Plaintiff married her husband in 1981. In 1985, plaintiff conveyed the property to herself and her husband via a recorded quitclaim deed.

In 1992, the husband unilaterally granted a mortgage on the property in favor of himself to secure a debt. The mortgage described the husband as a single man and plaintiff’s name does not appear anywhere in the recorded document. Under the mortgage’s terms, payment was due in March 1993.

Plaintiff and her husband paid off the land contract, and in 1994 the property was deeded to plaintiff. The husband died in 2015, leaving plaintiff as the sole remaining owner of the property.

In November 2017, plaintiff brought a suit to quiet title and to extinguish defendant’s mortgage. Defendant filed a counterclaim, requesting that the trial court declare the mortgage valid and enter a monetary judgment against plaintiff for the unpaid balance of the mortgage plus interest.

Plaintiff moved the trial court for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(7), (8) and (10). She argued that she and her husband co-owned the property as tenants by the entirety and that the mortgage was invalid because she did not join her husband in signing it.

In response, defendant contended that the mortgage was valid because plaintiff subsequently ratified it. The trial court agreed with plaintiff and granted her summary disposition and quiet title. The court also determined that defendant’s counterclaim was barred by the statute of limitations.

In Michigan, a conveyance of real property to a husband and wife is presumed to create a tenancy by the entirety. Each spouse is considered to be an owner of the whole property, and neither spouse has an individual interest in the property separate from the other spouse.

When a married couple holds real property as tenants by the entirety, neither spouse acting by themselves can alienate or encumber their interest in the property.  A husband or wife must receive the consent of their spouse before conveying or encumbering an interest in the property.

Are you involved in a real estate dispute in Michigan? Are you seeking an efficient and effective resolution to a property litigation matter?

To schedule a free consultation with one of our experienced real estate litigation attorneys, contact our law office in Plymouth, Michigan.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Are Juvenile Records Public or Can They be Expunged?

There is something in most people’s life they regret - if they could redo a moment, they would have done it better. Although there is no physical way to erase the past or redo past wrongs, there is a legal way to prevent some of the crimes...

FAMILY LAW 42: Motion to modify custody denied due to lack of supporting affidavits or documentation.

The lack of substantiation, again and again, could reasonably call into question plaintiff’s motives and credibility on all matters. The trial court appeared more than open to further considering a motion to modify custody if plaintiff would come forward with supporting documentary evidence, explaining why the court took the unusual step of denying the motion without prejudice.

WILLS/TRUSTS 21: Plaintiff alleged the University failed to use the funds consistent with the terms of the trust.

On April 23, 2018, plaintiff filed suit, alleging (1) breach of contract, namely the University’s failure to use the funds consistent with the terms of the Gift Agreement, and seeking damages or specific performance; (2) breach of fiduciary duty, on account of the University’s failure, as trustee of the charitable trust established by Professor’s gift, to comply with the terms and conditions of the resulting charitable trust; (3) violation of the Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act, MCL 451.921 et seq.; and (4) the need for injunctive relief prohibiting the dissipation of funds during the pendency of the case.

What is Collaborative Divorce Family Law?

Coming to the end of a happy time is a challenge no one wants to deal with in life. The end of a marriage through a divorce can especially be a tough, emotional, and complicated period. Lawyers and judges deciding your future, remembering important...

FAMILY LAW 41: To minimize disruptive changes in children’s custody, moving party must establish cause or a change of circumstance.

To minimize unwarranted and disruptive changes in children’s custody, a trial court may only modify children’s custody if the moving party first establishes a proper cause or a change of circumstances. The purpose of this framework is to erect a barrier against removal of a child from an established custodial environment and to minimize unwarranted and disruptive changes of custody orders.

DIVORCE 35: Proceeds received by one spouse in a personal injury lawsuit are generally considered separate property.

Proceeds received by one spouse in a personal injury lawsuit meant to compensate for pain and suffering, as opposed to lost wages, are generally considered separate property. Moreover, separate assets may lose their character as separate property and transform into marital property if they are commingled with marital assets and treated by the parties as marital property.

4 Common Real Estate Disputes to Watch Out For

Creating a mutually beneficial real estate deal usually goes through smoothly with both sides presenting their interests then negotiating toward a middle ground they can both agree to uphold. Unfortunately, not all deals go through without an issue....

Is My Conviction Eligible for Expungement?

At one point or another, we have all made mistakes. For some people, those mistakes involved breaking the law. Convictions have a large impact on someone’s life. Beyond the sentencing ranging from community service to fines, to jail or prison...

REAL ESTATE 44: Rule of acquiescence in boundary disputes.

The doctrine of acquiescence provides that, where adjoining property owners acquiesce to a boundary line for a period of at least fifteen years, that line becomes the actual boundary line. The underlying reason for the rule of acquiescence is the promotion of peaceful resolution of boundary disputes.

FAMILY LAW 37: Referee recommended against changing legal custody or parenting time.

Plaintiff requested sole legal custody, arguing that she and defendant had difficulty co-parenting and that defendant would not agree to medical treatment for the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD, need for orthodontic work, and need for vision testing and glasses. Plaintiff also requested an alternating weekly or biweekly schedule during the summer, which would increase her overall parenting time.

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
consultation
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000
734-237-6482
734-366-4405