Now Accepting New Clients!

REAL ESTATE 73: Quiet title action.

This case involves a dispute over real property located in Michigan. W and V who are D’s parents, acquired the property. In 1999, W and V conveyed the property to the Trust, to which W is the sole trustee, via a quit claim deed. At some point thereafter, V died.

In 2015, D filed a claim of interest concerning the property in the Oakland County Register of Deeds. The claim of interest, which was signed by D, provided that on or about 2003, D was assigned a certain executory contract for the sale of land, a land contract was entered.

W on behalf of the Trust, filed an action against D (quiet title action). It was alleged that the Trust was the sole owner of the property and that D was without any rights to the property. The Trust requested that the entirely false notice of claim be set aside, vacated and declared null and void and that the Trust be awarded damages as a result of D’s creation of a cloud upon the title. D answered the complaint, alleging that he had a valid interest in the property under the land contract.

After the close of discovery, W on behalf of the Trust, filed a motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10). It was alleged that summary disposition was proper because D was unable to produce the land contract. The trial court conditionally ordered D to file a release of the claim of interest in the Oakland County Register of Deeds.

Quiet Title Claim

Quieting title is a legal procedure to establish a right to ownership of real property against one or more adverse claimants. A quiet title action also is called a suit to remove a cloud in title. A cloud is any claim or potential claim to ownership of the property.

Burden of Proof

In this case, it was undisputed that W and V owned the property in question and that they later conveyed the property to the Trust. This is exhibited by a 1999 quit claim deed, which was recorded in the Oakland County Register of Deeds. Because the Trust established a prima facie case of title, the burden shifted to D to prove superior right or title.

Although D claimed an interest in the property under a land contract, he never produced the land contract. Instead, he argued that the contract was missing and that he could testify concerning its terms. However, in Michigan, the sale of land is controlled by the statute of frauds. A contract for the sale of land must be in writing and be signed by the seller or someone lawfully authorized by the seller in writing.

Assistance with Quiet Title Claims

Do you need to file a quiet title claim or have questions? Aldrich Legal Services represents clients in a wide range of real estate litigation.  Our attorneys can help answer your questions.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Speak to a Pro: (734) 404-3000

Three reasons to put a power of attorney in place

Originally posted on 11/08/2016 While no one wants to think of the unfortunate possibility of being incapacitated or of a time when we can't handle our own affairs, this circumstance is a real possibility. If something happens and this...

How to approach parents about estate planning

Originally posted on 12/09/2016 Family forms a strong foundation for many people's first and most intimate community. It is important to strengthen these first relationships so even uncommon questions become natural. For those...

PROBATE 44: Petition for Mental Health Treatment

Michigan’s Mental Health Code governs the civil admission and discharge procedures for a person with a mental illness. Specifically, MCL 330.1434 sets forth the procedure and content requirements for a petition for mental health treatment.

Should you get your criminal record expunged?

Originally posted on 04/12/2017 If you have been convicted of a crime, have served your sentence, and have followed all court recommendations, you should be able to put your past behind you and move on with life. Moving forward is critical...

Choosing the right executor for an estate

Originally posted on 05/28/2017 When people are thinking about planning their estate, they often think about trying to minimize the estate tax, keeping their will updated, and keeping items out of probate court; however, there is another...

Understanding how the Miranda warning works

Originally posted on 11/25/2016 Michigan residents who have seen television police shows or movies involving law enforcement have no doubt watched many dramatic scenes with officers quoting something to the effect of, "You have the...

PROBATE 42: Dissolution of professional corporation.

This case involves the estate of a doctor whose professional corporation also had to be dissolved upon his death. The personal representative of the estate sold the company’s assets but did not pay off the company’s debts before transferring the proceeds to the estate and distributing them to the heirs.

A basic introduction to wills

Originally posted on 10/31/2016 It can be difficult to consider the end of our lives when we are in good health. However, lives can change at any moment, so it is wise to be prepared for any situation that may arise. Despite the many...

How Is Alimony Determined In A Michigan Divorce?

Originally posted on 06/22/2018. When filing for divorce in Michigan, you may seek alimony, spousal support, from their spouse whenever they require financial aid. A judge may order your spouse to pay certain alimony. However, it depends...

Is My Conviction Eligible for Expungement?

Originally posted on 10/11/2019. At one point or another, we have all made mistakes. For some people, those mistakes involved breaking the law. Convictions have a large impact on someone’s life. Beyond the sentencing ranging from...

PROBATE 45: The court held that the probate court did not err by granting summary disposition for Plaintiff, or by denying Defendant’s request for an extension of the discovery period, adjournment of mediation, and issuance of subpoenas and by dismi

This case arises out of competing petitions for probate. On November 19, 2018, Defendant initiated this case by filing a petition for probate, attaching Decedent’s death certificate and purported last will and testament, dated March 9, 2007,...

DIVORCE 57: Holding that the trial court’s factual findings were not supported by the record evidence, and thus could not stand, the court reversed, vacated the portion of the Amended Default JOD ordering defendant to pay $3,325 to plaintiff, and re

Plaintiff first testified that she and defendant purchased the marital home in 1995. At the time the first default judgment of divorce was entered in September 2017, plaintiff had the home appraised. The value of the home was determined to be...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000