Now Accepting New Clients!

REAL ESTATE 74: Right of First Refusal Agreement

In 2000, plaintiff entered into a right-of-first-refusal agreement with EAS regarding certain real property adjacent to plaintiff’s property. EAS granted to Plaintiff a Right of First Refusal to purchase the EAS Property, upon the terms and conditions set forth below.


Within ten (10) days of receiving a bona fide written offer from a third party to purchase all or any portion of the EAS Property, EAS shall provide a written copy of said offer to Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall then have forty-eight (48) hours after receipt of the third party offer to agree to purchase all or any portion of the EAS property upon the identical terms and conditions as set forth in the third party offer. EAS may split or otherwise divide the EAS Property. In that event, an offer to purchase a portion of the EAS Property shall be subject to the terms of this Agreement.

Declined to Exercise Right of First Refusal

In 2008, the EAS Property was conveyed by quitclaim deed to the Bank in lieu of a foreclosure. There is no dispute this conveyance was not a bona fide offer that would have triggered plaintiff’s rights under the agreement. Subsequently, the Bank conveyed Parcels 1 and 3 to PS. Prior to the conveyance of Parcel 3, plaintiff was notified in writing pursuant to the agreement, and plaintiff declined to exercise his right of first refusal to purchase Parcel 3.

In 2013, the PS conveyed Parcels 1 and 3 BT. This deed and mortgage were recorded.

More than five years later, plaintiff initiated a three-count complaint for breach of the right-of-first-refusal agreement, quiet title, and declaratory relief. Plaintiff alleged that BT obtained the EAS property from the PS without plaintiff first being afforded his right of first refusal that was provided by the agreement.

Summary Disposition

Defendants moved for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(8) (failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted) and MCR 2.116(C)(10) (no genuine issue of material fact).

The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary disposition. The court concluded that plaintiff’s right of first refusal had been extinguished after the conveyance to the PS because at that time, the conditions triggered plaintiff’s option to purchase the property and he failed to exercise that option. The agreement cannot be construed as running with the land or otherwise surviving plaintiff’s decision to affirmatively decline to exercise his right of first refusal.

Protect Your Transaction with Help from a Real Estate Attorney

Aldrich Legal Services offers comprehensive real estate services to meet the legal needs of homeowners, commercial property owners, investors, real estate developers and other parties with real estate interests in Michigan.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Speak to a Pro: (734) 404-3000


Three reasons to put a power of attorney in place

Originally posted on 11/08/2016 While no one wants to think of the unfortunate possibility of being incapacitated or of a time when we can't handle our own affairs, this circumstance is a real possibility. If something happens and this...

How to approach parents about estate planning

Originally posted on 12/09/2016 Family forms a strong foundation for many people's first and most intimate community. It is important to strengthen these first relationships so even uncommon questions become natural. For those...

PROBATE 44: Petition for Mental Health Treatment

Michigan’s Mental Health Code governs the civil admission and discharge procedures for a person with a mental illness. Specifically, MCL 330.1434 sets forth the procedure and content requirements for a petition for mental health treatment.

Should you get your criminal record expunged?

Originally posted on 04/12/2017 If you have been convicted of a crime, have served your sentence, and have followed all court recommendations, you should be able to put your past behind you and move on with life. Moving forward is critical...

Choosing the right executor for an estate

Originally posted on 05/28/2017 When people are thinking about planning their estate, they often think about trying to minimize the estate tax, keeping their will updated, and keeping items out of probate court; however, there is another...

Understanding how the Miranda warning works

Originally posted on 11/25/2016 Michigan residents who have seen television police shows or movies involving law enforcement have no doubt watched many dramatic scenes with officers quoting something to the effect of, "You have the...

PROBATE 42: Dissolution of professional corporation.

This case involves the estate of a doctor whose professional corporation also had to be dissolved upon his death. The personal representative of the estate sold the company’s assets but did not pay off the company’s debts before transferring the proceeds to the estate and distributing them to the heirs.

A basic introduction to wills

Originally posted on 10/31/2016 It can be difficult to consider the end of our lives when we are in good health. However, lives can change at any moment, so it is wise to be prepared for any situation that may arise. Despite the many...

REAL ESTATE 73: Quiet title action.

This case involves a dispute over real property located in Michigan. W and V who are D’s parents, acquired the property. In 1999, W and V conveyed the property to the Trust, to which W is the sole trustee, via a quit claim deed. At some point...

How Is Alimony Determined In A Michigan Divorce?

Originally posted on 06/22/2018. When filing for divorce in Michigan, you may seek alimony, spousal support, from their spouse whenever they require financial aid. A judge may order your spouse to pay certain alimony. However, it depends...

Is My Conviction Eligible for Expungement?

Originally posted on 10/11/2019. At one point or another, we have all made mistakes. For some people, those mistakes involved breaking the law. Convictions have a large impact on someone’s life. Beyond the sentencing ranging from...

PROBATE 45: The court held that the probate court did not err by granting summary disposition for Plaintiff, or by denying Defendant’s request for an extension of the discovery period, adjournment of mediation, and issuance of subpoenas and by dismi

This case arises out of competing petitions for probate. On November 19, 2018, Defendant initiated this case by filing a petition for probate, attaching Decedent’s death certificate and purported last will and testament, dated March 9, 2007,...

DIVORCE 57: Holding that the trial court’s factual findings were not supported by the record evidence, and thus could not stand, the court reversed, vacated the portion of the Amended Default JOD ordering defendant to pay $3,325 to plaintiff, and re

Plaintiff first testified that she and defendant purchased the marital home in 1995. At the time the first default judgment of divorce was entered in September 2017, plaintiff had the home appraised. The value of the home was determined to be...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000