Now Accepting New Clients!

The Difference Between Theft, Robbery, and Burglary

Original Post: 1/11/2019

A burglar breaks into someone's home in order to take something they do not own. Often, burglary, robbery, and theft are used interchangeably even though there are distinct differences between all of them. Though, what all three do have in common is they may involve the unlawful taking of someone’s personal property by someone else.

In this article, we break down the differences between burglary, robbery, and theft.

What is Theft?

A situation in which there is an unauthorized taking of property from another person to deprive them of it is considered theft, or larceny as the two terms are used interchangeably. Theft typically involved three main elements

  • taking someone’s money or property without their permission,
  • carrying the property or product away, and/or
  • intending to keep the property or product permanently.

Someone can also commit the crime by taking unattended property such as a bike, cash left on a restaurant table, or even a parked car. 

What is Robbery?

For some, theft and robbery sound the same because it involves stealing. Though the differentiating factor is that robbery is theft that includes physical force, fear, or intimidation. An individual cannot commit a robbery unless they take something from someone else, such as taking something they’re holding or taking property that is within their control. 

What is Burglary?

Burglary is the unlawful entry of a premise, such as a home, with intent to commit a crime once inside. Typically, burglary is a crime that can often include theft; however, an individual doesn’t necessarily need to take any property in order to be convicted of the crime. You can be charged with burglary whether or not the offense intended was actually committed. 

Criminal Defense from an Experienced Michigan Attorney

Although burglary, robbery, and theft have similar descriptions, they’re all different crimes that have their own set of penalties and consequences. 

If you or someone you know has been charged with any of the above crimes, give Aldrich Legal Services a call today. Our team of lawyers are familiar with the local system and can give you the help you deserve.

Michigan Expungement Law Updates For 2021

There has been a new laws regarding expungements for the state of Michigan.  Gov. Gretchen Whitmer signed legislation that expands the criteria for expungements related to traffic offenses, marijuana convictions, and minor...

Wills and Trusts

Originally posted on: 02/14/2014 Aldrich Legal Service provides legal advice and representation for residents in Plymouth, Ann Arbor, and Southeast Michigan. We also review recent legal cases to examine what took place and what we can...

REAL ESTATE 68: Holding that plaintiffs-buyers’ allegations of fraud in this case arising from the sale of a residence did not preclude the trial court from granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition based on a release, the court affirmed.

This cause of action arises from plaintiffs’ purchase of a residence from defendant, who had rights in the house under a land contract from co-defendant, the legal owner of the house. Before the house was for sale, in January 2018, an upstairs...

REAL ESTATE 65: Determining that it could not conclude the trial court erred in its factual findings, and that it did not err in reforming a 2005 deed, the court affirmed the ruling that defendants were fee simple owners of the disputed 50-foot area

This case arose from a real-property dispute between brothers, as well as their respective wives. After a bench trial, the trial court rendered its findings of fact. The trial court determined that plaintiffs did not prove that excluding the...

FAMILY LAW 58: The trial court did not err by denying defendant-father’s motion to change custody and modify his parenting time of the parties’ child without having an evidentiary hearing to determine if there was proper cause or a change in circums

This case arose from a custody and parenting-time dispute between plaintiff-mother and father over their minor child. After father failed to respond to the paternity complaint within the 21 days of receipt of the complaint, mother filed an affidavit...

DIVORCE 53: Although the court affirmed the trial court’s decisions to deny defendant’s motions to set aside the default and the default JOD, it vacated the portions of the default JOD as to the distribution of marital property, custody, parenting t

Plaintiff filed for divorce. Defendant filed an answer and a counterclaim for divorce.  Plaintiff and defendant were both ordered to appear at the settlement conference. After defendant failed to appear, the trial court entered a default. Soon...

FAMILY LAW 53: The trial court erred by treating the parties’ GAL as an LGAL and denying the parties the right to question her at a hearing; however, the trial court did not err in requiring the parties to compensate the GAL for her services.

Plaintiff and Defendant were never married, but share a young son who was born in 2016. The parties have battled over custody, child support, and other parenting issues ever since. In the spring of 2019, the parties filed competing motions to modify...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000