Now Accepting New Clients!

Where occupants' leases are not recorded, they are not entitled to same notice as owners in tax foreclosure

The court held that despite any violations of MCL 211.78f and MCL 211.78i, the trial court properly denied the respondents-property owners' motion to set aside the judgment of foreclosure because they were properly served with notice and thus, they could not claim that notice was insufficient because the occupants of the premises were not served. "Although it is one taxable parcel, two separate business are operated on the premises" - a salon and an insurance business. While the parcel is commonly known by the street number 2920, each business operates under a different address. The salon operates at 2920 and the insurance business uses 2922. Respondents argued that the petitioner-county treasurer's failure to mail notice to and personally serve an occupant of the parcel constituted a violation of due process, and that because the treasurer did not comply with the relevant statutory procedures, the trial court was required to cancel the treasurer's sale of the parcel. The court disagreed, noting that it was "undisputed that respondents, as owners of the property, received constitutionally and statutorily sufficient notice of the tax foreclosure proceedings." There was "no evidence that the notice required under MCL 211.78f(1) was mailed to an 'occupant' as required by MCL 211.78f(2)." Also, while the treasurer appeared to have "made a personal visit as required by MCL 211.78i(3), it occurred on a Sunday and no notice was personally served on any occupant at that time." The treasurer argued that since the occupants' leases were not recorded, they were not entitled to the same notice as owners of a property interest, such as respondents. Respondents admitted that the occupants' leases were not recorded, but asserted that the leasehold interest of the occupant of 2922 would have been discovered if the records listed in MCL 211.78i(6) had been properly searched. It appeared that the interest was identifiable and the insurance business was entitled to notice by certified mail under MCL 211.78i(1). "Such notice was not provided." The treasurer's agent made a personal visit to the property, and posted a notice on the building. The court noted that this visit was not inadequate on the basis the agent only visited 2920 and not 2922. Pursuant to MCL 211.78i(10), it held that even if the treasurer "failed to comply with the provisions of MCL 211.78i, the proceedings were valid because respondents were provided actual notice and due process was satisfied." Affirmed.

Basic responsibilities of an executor

Originally posted on 01/11/2017 The emotional toils of dealing with the death of a loved one can be considerably difficult. Nevertheless, perseverance is paramount; especially if you are appointed to be an executor to one’s...

What you need to compliment your will

Originally posted on 02/08/2017 Making end-of-life plans usually end with a will, but they shouldn't. Some believe that simply having a will is enough. However, this post will briefly explain how having other estate planning...

The benefits of home health care providers

Originally posted on 03/22/2017 As we get older or suffer an injury, we need a little extra help. Home health care providers or caregivers can provide the assistance needed to handle your or your loved one's health and safety...

What to know about bail conditions

Originally posted on 03/06/2017 If you have been arrested and are being held on the suspicion that you have committed a particular crime, chances are that the only thing you are thinking about is getting out of jail as soon as possible and...

College students and estate planning

Originally posted on 12/16/2016 With college semesters starting up in Michigan, it may not be so easy to get college students to think responsibly. This time can be especially tough with the need of moving back to school and getting...

Three reasons to put a power of attorney in place

Originally posted on 11/08/2016 While no one wants to think of the unfortunate possibility of being incapacitated or of a time when we can't handle our own affairs, this circumstance is a real possibility. If something happens and this...

How to approach parents about estate planning

Originally posted on 12/09/2016 Family forms a strong foundation for many people's first and most intimate community. It is important to strengthen these first relationships so even uncommon questions become natural. For those...

PROBATE 44: Petition for Mental Health Treatment

Michigan’s Mental Health Code governs the civil admission and discharge procedures for a person with a mental illness. Specifically, MCL 330.1434 sets forth the procedure and content requirements for a petition for mental health treatment.

Should you get your criminal record expunged?

Originally posted on 04/12/2017 If you have been convicted of a crime, have served your sentence, and have followed all court recommendations, you should be able to put your past behind you and move on with life. Moving forward is critical...

Choosing the right executor for an estate

Originally posted on 05/28/2017 When people are thinking about planning their estate, they often think about trying to minimize the estate tax, keeping their will updated, and keeping items out of probate court; however, there is another...

Understanding how the Miranda warning works

Originally posted on 11/25/2016 Michigan residents who have seen television police shows or movies involving law enforcement have no doubt watched many dramatic scenes with officers quoting something to the effect of, "You have the...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000