The arbitrator stated that the award document had not included any amount for case-evaluation sanctions and that, in fact, he had not even known the results of the case evaluation until after issuance of the awards.
Browse Our Blog for Knowledge on How to Protect Yourself Legally and to See Examples of How We've Achieved Results
Posts in the Business Law category:
BUSINESS LAW 9: The open term “best efforts” did not prevent an agreement from being formed due to a lack of a meeting of the minds.
If defendant was concerned about placing any limitations on the performance necessary to satisfy this obligation, he should have included that limitation in the agreement.
BUSINESS LAW 8: Plaintiff awarded attorney fees as a sanction for filing a motion which the court found was disingenuous.
The trial court further awarded plaintiff attorney fees as a sanction for F Company’s filing of the motion to set aside the judgment, which it found was disingenuous.
At arbitration, plaintiff presented a counter claim and alleged that defendant had abandoned the contract, leaving significant portions of the commercial building uncompleted, and further, refused to return to complete the work or perform corrective work.
Based on the testimony, the trial court ordered the dissolution and liquidation of the assets of the LLC. The trial court also directed the LLC to make a distribution to plaintiff, which represented the 49% share owed to him to compensate for defendant’s distribution.
When an employer terminates its pension plan, ERISA liability does not end with the company that actually promised pension payments. Instead, a trade or business under common control of the employer is treated as part of the employer and so incurs liability under ERISA.
It is a fundamental rule of civil procedure in this state that leave to amend pleadings should be given freely.
The subcontracts written by Defendant and signed by Plaintiff unambiguously contemplated that if any disputes related to their subcontract found their way to a courtroom, a jury would not be impaneled to resolve them.
Plaintiff primarily contends that the arbitration panel’s majority incorrectly found that plaintiff bore the burden of proof.
Despite the Release of Claims unambiguous terms, defendants filed complaints against plaintiffs with the Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA). Plaintiffs responded by filing a lawsuit.
The “tender back rule” requires that a party may not file a lawsuit asserting previously released claims or repudiate a release unless the party first repays all consideration received in exchange for the release.
The court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of plaintiff's breach of contract claim and reversed the denial of defendant's motion for summary disposition of plaintiff's remaining claims.
Defendant argued that the trial court should have dismissed plaintiff's remaining claims-unjust enrichment, implied contract/quasi-contract, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty-under MCR 2.116(C)(10) because of the express terms of the LCC...
A court erred in dismissing a breach of contract claim in favor or defendants where a valid lease contract existed between the parties
The court reversed the trial court's grant of summary disposition in favor of defendants on plaintiff's breach of contract claim, and remanded for entry of summary disposition in favor of plaintiff on that claim. It affirmed the trial court's grant...
Holding that the trial court properly granted the plaintiff summary disposition because the only alleged consideration for the modification of the parties' agreement fell within the preexisting duty rule and thus, could not be adequate...
Individual who attempted to characterize withdrawal as a loan estopped form arguing it was a distribution for garnishment purposes
The court reversed and remanded for entry of an order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant-Great Lakes (garnishor). Plaintiff-KBD sued Great Lakes. Great Lakes obtained a favorable verdict that also resulted in an award of costs and...