DIVORCE 17: Judgment states, obligations owed to each other shall be deemed a support obligation which is not dischargeable in Bankruptcy.

The parties were married later in life in 1996, and filed cross-complaints for divorce in 2012.

The judgment required plaintiff to pay defendant $1,000 in monthly spousal support for a set period, to be set off by payments defendant received directly from plaintiff’s pension through a qualified domestic relation order (QDRO). The parties’ personal property settlement included a provision stating that all marital debt shall be evenly divided between the parties. In the event of a bankruptcy, those debts may be discharged.

The judgment also contained a separate provision entitled nondischargeability of obligations and debts, stating: to the extent either party is required by the terms of the Judgment to assume responsibility for paying certain debts, including obligations owed to each other, such obligation shall be deemed a support obligation under 11 U.S.C. Section 523 (a) (5) which is not dischargeable in Bankruptcy as to the other party.

The parties were in severe financial straits when they filed for divorce and anticipated that both would soon file for bankruptcy. At the July 3, 2013 settlement hearing, counsel for both parties indicated that bankruptcy was imminent. Plaintiff did file for bankruptcy and secured the discharge of his debts, including his half of those bills making up the marital debt.

Unlike plaintiff, and apparently against the advice of her attorney and the court, defendant did not file for bankruptcy and lost the marital home to foreclosure. Defendant sought court intervention and secured several adjustments to the spousal support award. In a 2015 motion to enforce the judgment and to show cause, defendant contended for the first time that plaintiff had not met his divorce judgment obligation to pay half of the marital debt.

While the debts may have been, and were discharged via a bankruptcy, further provisions of the Judgment of Divorce indicated that any debts set forth in the judgment were deemed support and not dischargeable. In essence, while a bankruptcy court could discharge the debts, they still remained owing to that party to whom they were payable as support, which is not dischargeable.

Nobody has ever disputed, Judge, that they could go into Bankruptcy Court and discharge those creditors, the credit card company, the mortgage. They could have those discharged, but they still owe the debts to each other. And defendant made it clear that she did not want to file bankruptcy. She had no intent of walking away from her obligations.  She’s still trying to make these payments. The court then ordered plaintiff to remit his share of the marital debt directly to defendant.

Were you just served with divorce papers? In order to protect your financial rights, it is important to have an experienced and understanding divorce attorney by your side at every step of the way.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Top 3 Misconceptions on Power of Attorney

Considering leaving the country for a long time while maintaining a business or selling a home in the US? Were you recently diagnosed with a terminal or degenerative disease? For these and many other issues, it may become necessary for someone...

FAMILY LAW 29: Quitclaim deed signed after prenuptial agreement prevails.

The court ruled that title to the land prevails and that once the deed was signed, the property became the undivided whole interest for both the decedent and appellee and became appellee’s property upon the decedent’s death. Consequently, the court concluded that the prenuptial agreement did not have any impact on the property rights of appellee in this case.

Know the Differences between Annulment and Divorce

  Marriage can end through two ways: divorce and annulment. Though both of these options have the same result, each has different requirements. There are many similarities and differences between a divorce and an annulment, so many...

Understanding Vaping Laws for Minors

  Vaping is a fad that is quickly solidifying into a stable industry of products around the world. Vaping and electronic cigarette (or e-cigarette) use have dramatically increased from roughly “seven million [users] in 2011 to 35...

Michigans New Marijuana Laws

The 2018 ballot initiative titled “the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA) passed with 56% of the vote. Michigan joins nine states and D.C. in legalizing some form of recreational marijuana use.  Due to the...

Cyberbullying Is Now A Punishable Crime In Michigan

Beginning in March 2019, cyberbullying will now be illegal in the state of Michigan. The House Bill 5017 now makes cyberbullying a punishable crime by Michigan law, meaning that those who harass others online could face potential jail...

The Difference Between Theft, Robbery and Burglary

Often, burglary, robbery, and theft are used interchangeably even though there are distinct differences between all of them. Though, what all three do have in common is they may involve the unlawful taking of someone’s personal property by...

Do I Have To Go To Court If I Get A Divorce?

If you’re contemplating a divorce in Michigan, you probably have a lot of questions. One of the most intimidating aspects of getting a divorce in Michigan or anywhere else is the idea of having to appear in court. The laws for getting a...

Do I Need A Prenuptial Agreement?

A prenuptial agreement is not only for the wealthy people in society, like Hollywood celebrities and the like but also for any couple that brings personal assets, property, debts or children from a former relationship into the marriage. This...

PROBATE 19: Respondent argues she did not receive notice of hearing until five days before.

Respondent argues that she was denied her right to due process of law because she did not receive notice of the hearing until five days before it took place. Respondent argues that the five-day notice of hearing violated her right to due process. Due process generally requires that notice be reasonably calculated to apprise interested parties of the action and to provide them an opportunity to be heard.

WILLS/TRUSTS 11: Allegations that a trustee violated his fiduciary duties.

MCL 700.7803 states that a trustee shall act as would a prudent person in dealing with the property of another, including following the standards of the Michigan prudent investor rule. If the trustee has special skills or is named trustee on the basis of representation of special skills or expertise, the trustee is under a duty to use those skills. MCL 700.7810 states that a trustee shall take reasonable steps to take control of and protect the trust property.

How Is Probation Violated?

If you are on probation, it means you have the judge's trust and have been allowed some level of freedom. Now you must work on ensuring you don’t violate your probation. You will need to abide by every term that the criminal court judge...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000