734-359-7018
Now Accepting New Clients!
Blog

DIVORCE 24: Court granted plaintiff-ex-wife $58,500 in attorney fees.

Plaintiff and defendant married in 1998 and filed for divorce on May 31, 2014. The parties have two minor children and share joint legal and physical custody. In relevant part, both parties sought attorney fees from each other: defendant sought $45,500.00 in attorney fees and plaintiff sought $104,000.00.

Plaintiff testified that in 2014 she filed a tax return, but she was not employed as a W-2 employee between 2003 and 2014 because she was a stay-at-home mother.

Plaintiff gained employment at Michigan State University as a secretary, making $43,000.00. Plaintiff testified that she incurred a total of $120,949.71 in attorney fees, but she received a discount of $11,075.16 for paying her bill in full by a certain date. In order to pay off the bill and make payments on her home, plaintiff stated that she had to borrow substantial amounts of money from others and liquidate assets at a loss. Plaintiff testified that she was deposed a total of five times throughout the divorce action, and she spent three days in mediation.

However, defendant contended that plaintiff herself drove up costs by failing to produce necessary documents. Defendant particularly cited plaintiff’s failure to bring certain documents pertaining to her income to multiple depositions, although the notice defendant mailed for at least one of those depositions did not provide the full 28 days’ notice required by law.

Defendant’s attorney stated that the total fees incurred by both sides are far beyond what he usually sees in divorce cases. Regarding the reasonableness of five depositions, he testified that he has not conducted five depositions in an average divorce case in the last few years.

The trial court ultimately concluded that it was unreasonable for defendant to continue pursuing information about plaintiff’s income for the purpose of attorney fees. In particular, the trial court indicated that even with the excessive depositions and mediation, the case should have been resolved with 250 hours of attorney work at a rate of $300 an hour. The trial court awarded plaintiff $52,500.00 in attorney fees, and additionally sanctioned defendant $6,000.00 in favor of plaintiff for misconduct that caused plaintiff to incur unnecessary attorney fees.

The trial court concluded that defendant engaged in misconduct that caused plaintiff to incur unnecessary attorney fees. The trial court’s sanction was premised on defendant’s pursuit of the attorney fee issue.

Our family law practice is headed by Brad Aldrich, a knowledgeable divorce lawyer with more than 20 years of legal experience.  Our focus is on resolving your dispute as efficiently and cost-effectively as possible, while fully safeguarding your rights.

To schedule a free consultation with a divorce attorney at Aldrich Legal Services, contact us.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Three reasons to put a power of attorney in place

Originally posted on 11/08/2016 While no one wants to think of the unfortunate possibility of being incapacitated or of a time when we can't handle our own affairs, this circumstance is a real possibility. If something happens and this...

How to approach parents about estate planning

Originally posted on 12/09/2016 Family forms a strong foundation for many people's first and most intimate community. It is important to strengthen these first relationships so even uncommon questions become natural. For those...

PROBATE 44: Petition for Mental Health Treatment

Michigan’s Mental Health Code governs the civil admission and discharge procedures for a person with a mental illness. Specifically, MCL 330.1434 sets forth the procedure and content requirements for a petition for mental health treatment.

Should you get your criminal record expunged?

Originally posted on 04/12/2017 If you have been convicted of a crime, have served your sentence, and have followed all court recommendations, you should be able to put your past behind you and move on with life. Moving forward is critical...

Choosing the right executor for an estate

Originally posted on 05/28/2017 When people are thinking about planning their estate, they often think about trying to minimize the estate tax, keeping their will updated, and keeping items out of probate court; however, there is another...

Understanding how the Miranda warning works

Originally posted on 11/25/2016 Michigan residents who have seen television police shows or movies involving law enforcement have no doubt watched many dramatic scenes with officers quoting something to the effect of, "You have the...

PROBATE 42: Dissolution of professional corporation.

This case involves the estate of a doctor whose professional corporation also had to be dissolved upon his death. The personal representative of the estate sold the company’s assets but did not pay off the company’s debts before transferring the proceeds to the estate and distributing them to the heirs.

A basic introduction to wills

Originally posted on 10/31/2016 It can be difficult to consider the end of our lives when we are in good health. However, lives can change at any moment, so it is wise to be prepared for any situation that may arise. Despite the many...

REAL ESTATE 73: Quiet title action.

This case involves a dispute over real property located in Michigan. W and V who are D’s parents, acquired the property. In 1999, W and V conveyed the property to the Trust, to which W is the sole trustee, via a quit claim deed. At some point...

How Is Alimony Determined In A Michigan Divorce?

Originally posted on 06/22/2018. When filing for divorce in Michigan, you may seek alimony, spousal support, from their spouse whenever they require financial aid. A judge may order your spouse to pay certain alimony. However, it depends...

Is My Conviction Eligible for Expungement?

Originally posted on 10/11/2019. At one point or another, we have all made mistakes. For some people, those mistakes involved breaking the law. Convictions have a large impact on someone’s life. Beyond the sentencing ranging from...

PROBATE 45: The court held that the probate court did not err by granting summary disposition for Plaintiff, or by denying Defendant’s request for an extension of the discovery period, adjournment of mediation, and issuance of subpoenas and by dismi

This case arises out of competing petitions for probate. On November 19, 2018, Defendant initiated this case by filing a petition for probate, attaching Decedent’s death certificate and purported last will and testament, dated March 9, 2007,...

DIVORCE 57: Holding that the trial court’s factual findings were not supported by the record evidence, and thus could not stand, the court reversed, vacated the portion of the Amended Default JOD ordering defendant to pay $3,325 to plaintiff, and re

Plaintiff first testified that she and defendant purchased the marital home in 1995. At the time the first default judgment of divorce was entered in September 2017, plaintiff had the home appraised. The value of the home was determined to be...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
consultation
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000
734-237-6482
734-366-4405