DIVORCE 24: Court granted plaintiff-ex-wife $58,500 in attorney fees.

Plaintiff and defendant married in 1998 and filed for divorce on May 31, 2014. The parties have two minor children and share joint legal and physical custody. In relevant part, both parties sought attorney fees from each other: defendant sought $45,500.00 in attorney fees and plaintiff sought $104,000.00.

Plaintiff testified that in 2014 she filed a tax return, but she was not employed as a W-2 employee between 2003 and 2014 because she was a stay-at-home mother.

Plaintiff gained employment at Michigan State University as a secretary, making $43,000.00. Plaintiff testified that she incurred a total of $120,949.71 in attorney fees, but she received a discount of $11,075.16 for paying her bill in full by a certain date. In order to pay off the bill and make payments on her home, plaintiff stated that she had to borrow substantial amounts of money from others and liquidate assets at a loss. Plaintiff testified that she was deposed a total of five times throughout the divorce action, and she spent three days in mediation.

However, defendant contended that plaintiff herself drove up costs by failing to produce necessary documents. Defendant particularly cited plaintiff’s failure to bring certain documents pertaining to her income to multiple depositions, although the notice defendant mailed for at least one of those depositions did not provide the full 28 days’ notice required by law.

Defendant’s attorney stated that the total fees incurred by both sides are far beyond what he usually sees in divorce cases. Regarding the reasonableness of five depositions, he testified that he has not conducted five depositions in an average divorce case in the last few years.

The trial court ultimately concluded that it was unreasonable for defendant to continue pursuing information about plaintiff’s income for the purpose of attorney fees. In particular, the trial court indicated that even with the excessive depositions and mediation, the case should have been resolved with 250 hours of attorney work at a rate of $300 an hour. The trial court awarded plaintiff $52,500.00 in attorney fees, and additionally sanctioned defendant $6,000.00 in favor of plaintiff for misconduct that caused plaintiff to incur unnecessary attorney fees.

The trial court concluded that defendant engaged in misconduct that caused plaintiff to incur unnecessary attorney fees. The trial court’s sanction was premised on defendant’s pursuit of the attorney fee issue.

Our family law practice is headed by Brad Aldrich, a knowledgeable divorce lawyer with more than 20 years of legal experience.  Our focus is on resolving your dispute as efficiently and cost-effectively as possible, while fully safeguarding your rights.

To schedule a free consultation with a divorce attorney at Aldrich Legal Services, contact us.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Michigans New Marijuana Laws

The 2018 ballot initiative titled “the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA) passed with 56% of the vote. Michigan joins nine states and D.C. in legalizing some form of recreational marijuana use.  Due to the...

Cyberbullying Is Now A Punishable Crime In Michigan

Beginning in March 2019, cyberbullying will now be illegal in the state of Michigan. The House Bill 5017 now makes cyberbullying a punishable crime by Michigan law, meaning that those who harass others online could face potential jail...

The Difference Between Theft, Robbery and Burglary

Often, burglary, robbery, and theft are used interchangeably even though there are distinct differences between all of them. Though, what all three do have in common is they may involve the unlawful taking of someone’s personal property by...

Do I Have To Go To Court If I Get A Divorce?

If you’re contemplating a divorce in Michigan, you probably have a lot of questions. One of the most intimidating aspects of getting a divorce in Michigan or anywhere else is the idea of having to appear in court. The laws for getting a...

Do I Need A Prenuptial Agreement?

A prenuptial agreement is not only for the wealthy people in society, like Hollywood celebrities and the like but also for any couple that brings personal assets, property, debts or children from a former relationship into the marriage. This...

PROBATE 19: Respondent argues she did not receive notice of hearing until five days before.

Respondent argues that she was denied her right to due process of law because she did not receive notice of the hearing until five days before it took place. Respondent argues that the five-day notice of hearing violated her right to due process. Due process generally requires that notice be reasonably calculated to apprise interested parties of the action and to provide them an opportunity to be heard.

WILLS/TRUSTS 11: Allegations that a trustee violated his fiduciary duties.

MCL 700.7803 states that a trustee shall act as would a prudent person in dealing with the property of another, including following the standards of the Michigan prudent investor rule. If the trustee has special skills or is named trustee on the basis of representation of special skills or expertise, the trustee is under a duty to use those skills. MCL 700.7810 states that a trustee shall take reasonable steps to take control of and protect the trust property.

How Is Probation Violated?

If you are on probation, it means you have the judge's trust and have been allowed some level of freedom. Now you must work on ensuring you don’t violate your probation. You will need to abide by every term that the criminal court judge...

REAL ESTATE 25: Foreclosure and sheriff’s sale, redemption period expired.

In lieu of an answer, defendants filed a motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(8) and (C)(10), arguing essentially that plaintiff lacked standing to bring claims related to the Property because plaintiff’s legal interest in the Property was extinguished through properly conducted foreclosure proceedings and the redemption period had expired and that none of plaintiff’s claims had legal merit.

I Was Arrested- Can I Question The Cop?

There are things that the police wouldn’t want people to know, and this is for the apparent reason that their investigations wouldn’t yield many convictions as they would like. The role of a police officer is to make arrests followed by...

REAL ESTATE 24: Court dismissed defendant’s counterclaim for failure to join third party.

Defendants’ counter-complaint sought a declaration, among other things, that defendants had acquired a legal right to use the Drive as a means to access their property. But defendants did not add the LLC, the owner of the Drive, as a party to their suit. Consequently, the trial court dismissed defendant’s counterclaim for easement rights because of the failure to join LLC—a necessary party.

Can Your Marriage Be Annulled?

An annulment officially erases a marriage. In Michigan, it is harder to get your marriage annulled than it is to get a divorce. The annulment procedure is very similar to the divorce process, and you need filing of the right documents and service...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000