Blog

FAMILY LAW 24: Plaintiff-mother denied her motion to change parenting time.

Plaintiff-mother appeals an order denying her objections to the Friend of the Court referee’s recommendation to deny her motion to change parenting time.

In October 2010, a consent judgment of divorce was entered granting plaintiff and defendant-father joint physical custody of the minor child. Since then, plaintiff and defendant have filed numerous motions with the trial court regarding enforcement and custody modification issues concerning the child. Notably, in December 2013, the trial court found that plaintiff made serious, untrue allegations toward defendant’s family. In December 2014, defendant moved the trial court to modify custody, and after a lengthy evidentiary hearing conducted over the course of 2015, the Friend of Court referee recommended that defendant be awarded primary physical custody. In May 2016, a consent order was entered to that effect. Plaintiff was given parenting time on alternating weekends from Friday afternoon to Monday morning, midweek dinner parenting time on alternating Wednesdays from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., and three weeks of summer parenting time. In January 2017, plaintiff was granted an additional overnight on her alternating weekends.

In November 2017, plaintiff moved the trial court to change the child’s parenting time to grant her two additional overnights every other week. In her motion, plaintiff asserted that changing parenting time would foster her relationship with the child.

The referee found that plaintiff did not meet her burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that a proper cause or change of circumstances existed to warrant modifying parenting time, or that such a change would be in the child’s best interests.

Plaintiff argues that the trial court committed a clear legal error when it applied the wrong legal standard to her motion to change parenting time.

The Child Custody Act of 1970, MCL 722.21 et seq., authorizes a trial court to issue custody and parenting-time orders that are in the child’s best interests. A showing of proper cause or change of circumstances is required to modify a parenting-time order. The movant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that either proper cause or a change of circumstances exists.

Plaintiff’s proofs related mostly to her own personal improvement. The referee complimented plaintiff on her advances but failed to see grounds for modifying parenting time. The best interests of the child controls parenting time and changes must be grounded in the needs of the child, not the parent. In addition, there was no evidence that the present parenting-time schedule was insufficient for plaintiff to maintain a strong relationship with the child.

If you are going through a divorce or are separating from the mother or father of your children, it is important to protect your custodial rights. If the divorce or separation process does not turn out like you thought it would, you may not have the custody, visitation or child support you deserve.

Seek the advice and guidance of an experienced family law and divorce attorney who will be by your side every step of the way. At the Plymouth and Ann Arbor law firm of Aldrich Legal Services, our attorneys represent parents throughout southeast Michigan with a wide range of custody-related matters.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Top 3 Misconceptions on Power of Attorney

Considering leaving the country for a long time while maintaining a business or selling a home in the US? Were you recently diagnosed with a terminal or degenerative disease? For these and many other issues, it may become necessary for someone...

FAMILY LAW 29: Quitclaim deed signed after prenuptial agreement prevails.

The court ruled that title to the land prevails and that once the deed was signed, the property became the undivided whole interest for both the decedent and appellee and became appellee’s property upon the decedent’s death. Consequently, the court concluded that the prenuptial agreement did not have any impact on the property rights of appellee in this case.

Know the Differences between Annulment and Divorce

  Marriage can end through two ways: divorce and annulment. Though both of these options have the same result, each has different requirements. There are many similarities and differences between a divorce and an annulment, so many...

Understanding Vaping Laws for Minors

  Vaping is a fad that is quickly solidifying into a stable industry of products around the world. Vaping and electronic cigarette (or e-cigarette) use have dramatically increased from roughly “seven million [users] in 2011 to 35...

Michigans New Marijuana Laws

The 2018 ballot initiative titled “the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA) passed with 56% of the vote. Michigan joins nine states and D.C. in legalizing some form of recreational marijuana use.  Due to the...

Cyberbullying Is Now A Punishable Crime In Michigan

Beginning in March 2019, cyberbullying will now be illegal in the state of Michigan. The House Bill 5017 now makes cyberbullying a punishable crime by Michigan law, meaning that those who harass others online could face potential jail...

The Difference Between Theft, Robbery and Burglary

Often, burglary, robbery, and theft are used interchangeably even though there are distinct differences between all of them. Though, what all three do have in common is they may involve the unlawful taking of someone’s personal property by...

Do I Have To Go To Court If I Get A Divorce?

If you’re contemplating a divorce in Michigan, you probably have a lot of questions. One of the most intimidating aspects of getting a divorce in Michigan or anywhere else is the idea of having to appear in court. The laws for getting a...

Do I Need A Prenuptial Agreement?

A prenuptial agreement is not only for the wealthy people in society, like Hollywood celebrities and the like but also for any couple that brings personal assets, property, debts or children from a former relationship into the marriage. This...

PROBATE 19: Respondent argues she did not receive notice of hearing until five days before.

Respondent argues that she was denied her right to due process of law because she did not receive notice of the hearing until five days before it took place. Respondent argues that the five-day notice of hearing violated her right to due process. Due process generally requires that notice be reasonably calculated to apprise interested parties of the action and to provide them an opportunity to be heard.

WILLS/TRUSTS 11: Allegations that a trustee violated his fiduciary duties.

MCL 700.7803 states that a trustee shall act as would a prudent person in dealing with the property of another, including following the standards of the Michigan prudent investor rule. If the trustee has special skills or is named trustee on the basis of representation of special skills or expertise, the trustee is under a duty to use those skills. MCL 700.7810 states that a trustee shall take reasonable steps to take control of and protect the trust property.

How Is Probation Violated?

If you are on probation, it means you have the judge's trust and have been allowed some level of freedom. Now you must work on ensuring you don’t violate your probation. You will need to abide by every term that the criminal court judge...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
consultation
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000