REAL ESTATE 25: Foreclosure and sheriff’s sale, redemption period expired.

This case arises out of a foreclosure and sheriff’s sale involving plaintiff’s home. The Mortgage and accompanying loan were revived pursuant to a loan modification agreement, and the sheriff’s sale was set aside. The affidavit to set aside the sheriff’s sale and revive the mortgage was recorded on June 15, 2015.

Under the terms of the 2015 modification agreement between plaintiff and Bank, plaintiff’s total monthly payment was $592.24. The agreement specifically provided that the monthly escrow payment may adjust periodically. Consequently, the agreement also specifically provided that the total monthly payment may adjust periodically. Plaintiff specifically agreed in the modification agreement that he will be in default if he does not comply with the terms of the Loan Documents, as modified by the Agreement.

Pursuant to the agreement, the modifications took effect on June 1, 2015, and plaintiff’s first modified payment was due on July 1, 2015. The modification agreement was recorded on August 25, 2015.

On October 1, 2015, according to the affidavit of Bank loan administration analyst, an annual escrow disclosure statement was mailed via first class United States mail to plaintiff at his home on the Property. The escrow disclosure statement showed that plaintiff’s new monthly payment would be $857.76 and that this new payment amount would take effect on November 1, 2015.

In a letter dated February 23, 2016, addressed to plaintiff from Bank, plaintiff was informed that his loan was past due, and Bank offered plaintiff the opportunity to schedule a face-to-face interview to discuss his financial circumstances and options to make his loan current.  This letter was mailed to plaintiff at the Property via first class United States mail. In a letter dated February 25, 2016, addressed to plaintiff from Bank, plaintiff was informed that his failure to make timely payments on the mortgage note had caused a default in the Mortgage.

The letter further indicated that plaintiff could cure the default by submitting all payments due since January 1, 2016, which amounted to $1,818.02. The letter also stated: This default must be cured by paying the above amount. You have thirty (30) days from the date this letter is mailed to make your overdue payment. If you fail to cure this default, your indebtedness may be accelerated, the entire amount due and payable immediately, and it may result in the sale of the property. This letter was mailed to plaintiff at the Property via first class United States mail.

On August 6, 2016, notice that the Mortgage on the subject property was in default and would be foreclosed by sale was posted in a conspicuous place and attached in a secure manner to the Property. Additionally, notice that the Mortgage on the Property was in default and would be foreclosed by sale was published in the Oakland County Legal News. The sheriff’s deed was recorded on October 25, 2016.

On May 5, 2017, plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit against defendants.

In lieu of an answer, defendants filed a motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(8) and (C)(10), arguing essentially that plaintiff lacked standing to bring claims related to the Property because plaintiff’s legal interest in the Property was extinguished through properly conducted foreclosure proceedings and the redemption period had expired and that none of plaintiff’s claims had legal merit.

The trial court granted Bank’s motion for summary disposition.

Contact Aldrich Legal Services

Top 3 Misconceptions on Power of Attorney

Considering leaving the country for a long time while maintaining a business or selling a home in the US? Were you recently diagnosed with a terminal or degenerative disease? For these and many other issues, it may become necessary for someone...

FAMILY LAW 29: Quitclaim deed signed after prenuptial agreement prevails.

The court ruled that title to the land prevails and that once the deed was signed, the property became the undivided whole interest for both the decedent and appellee and became appellee’s property upon the decedent’s death. Consequently, the court concluded that the prenuptial agreement did not have any impact on the property rights of appellee in this case.

Know the Differences between Annulment and Divorce

  Marriage can end through two ways: divorce and annulment. Though both of these options have the same result, each has different requirements. There are many similarities and differences between a divorce and an annulment, so many...

Understanding Vaping Laws for Minors

  Vaping is a fad that is quickly solidifying into a stable industry of products around the world. Vaping and electronic cigarette (or e-cigarette) use have dramatically increased from roughly “seven million [users] in 2011 to 35...

Michigans New Marijuana Laws

The 2018 ballot initiative titled “the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA) passed with 56% of the vote. Michigan joins nine states and D.C. in legalizing some form of recreational marijuana use.  Due to the...

Cyberbullying Is Now A Punishable Crime In Michigan

Beginning in March 2019, cyberbullying will now be illegal in the state of Michigan. The House Bill 5017 now makes cyberbullying a punishable crime by Michigan law, meaning that those who harass others online could face potential jail...

The Difference Between Theft, Robbery and Burglary

Often, burglary, robbery, and theft are used interchangeably even though there are distinct differences between all of them. Though, what all three do have in common is they may involve the unlawful taking of someone’s personal property by...

Do I Have To Go To Court If I Get A Divorce?

If you’re contemplating a divorce in Michigan, you probably have a lot of questions. One of the most intimidating aspects of getting a divorce in Michigan or anywhere else is the idea of having to appear in court. The laws for getting a...

Do I Need A Prenuptial Agreement?

A prenuptial agreement is not only for the wealthy people in society, like Hollywood celebrities and the like but also for any couple that brings personal assets, property, debts or children from a former relationship into the marriage. This...

PROBATE 19: Respondent argues she did not receive notice of hearing until five days before.

Respondent argues that she was denied her right to due process of law because she did not receive notice of the hearing until five days before it took place. Respondent argues that the five-day notice of hearing violated her right to due process. Due process generally requires that notice be reasonably calculated to apprise interested parties of the action and to provide them an opportunity to be heard.

WILLS/TRUSTS 11: Allegations that a trustee violated his fiduciary duties.

MCL 700.7803 states that a trustee shall act as would a prudent person in dealing with the property of another, including following the standards of the Michigan prudent investor rule. If the trustee has special skills or is named trustee on the basis of representation of special skills or expertise, the trustee is under a duty to use those skills. MCL 700.7810 states that a trustee shall take reasonable steps to take control of and protect the trust property.

How Is Probation Violated?

If you are on probation, it means you have the judge's trust and have been allowed some level of freedom. Now you must work on ensuring you don’t violate your probation. You will need to abide by every term that the criminal court judge...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000