734-359-7018
Now Accepting New Clients!
Blog

The court held that the trial court properly terminated the respondents-parents' parental rights to the child where at least one statutory ground for termination existed and it was in the child's best interests.

The trial court terminated their rights based on their abuse of the child's sibling and/or failure to protect her from the other parent's abuse. On appeal, the court rejected respondent-mother's argument that termination was inappropriate because she was not provided with reunification services, noting because the goal was termination and not reunification, such services were not required. It also rejected her claim that the trial court should have implemented a guardianship instead of terminating her parental rights because it would have given her time to comply with a treatment plan, finding there were "no circumstances under which another child would be placed in" her care. The court next rejected her contention that the DHHS violated her due process rights by taking action that "virtually assured the creation of a ground for termination," noting it was clear that she "created the situation that led to DHHS's involvement." It further found that there were statutory grounds to support termination as the evidence established "a reasonable likelihood that [the child] would suffer injury or abuse in the foreseeable future if placed in" her care. Lastly, it held that termination was in the child's best interests, noting the "multiple serious injuries suffered by" the child's sister while in her care, and "the infant's ultimate death." As to respondent-father, the court found that although he had not established legal paternity of the child's sibling, his parental rights to the child could still be terminated under the statute. In addition, it found that the injuries to the sibling were "brutal" and she was "ultimately smothered to death." Despite this, he continued his relationship with the mother and tried to protect himself from any responsibility. The record showed a reasonable likelihood that the child would suffer injury or abuse in the foreseeable future if placed in his care. Lastly, the court found that termination of his rights was in the child's best interests, noting again the severe abuse of the child's sibling, the death of the sibling, and the failure to accept any responsibility. Affirmed.

Basic responsibilities of an executor

Originally posted on 01/11/2017 The emotional toils of dealing with the death of a loved one can be considerably difficult. Nevertheless, perseverance is paramount; especially if you are appointed to be an executor to one’s...

What you need to compliment your will

Originally posted on 02/08/2017 Making end-of-life plans usually end with a will, but they shouldn't. Some believe that simply having a will is enough. However, this post will briefly explain how having other estate planning...

The benefits of home health care providers

Originally posted on 03/22/2017 As we get older or suffer an injury, we need a little extra help. Home health care providers or caregivers can provide the assistance needed to handle your or your loved one's health and safety...

What to know about bail conditions

Originally posted on 03/06/2017 If you have been arrested and are being held on the suspicion that you have committed a particular crime, chances are that the only thing you are thinking about is getting out of jail as soon as possible and...

College students and estate planning

Originally posted on 12/16/2016 With college semesters starting up in Michigan, it may not be so easy to get college students to think responsibly. This time can be especially tough with the need of moving back to school and getting...

Three reasons to put a power of attorney in place

Originally posted on 11/08/2016 While no one wants to think of the unfortunate possibility of being incapacitated or of a time when we can't handle our own affairs, this circumstance is a real possibility. If something happens and this...

How to approach parents about estate planning

Originally posted on 12/09/2016 Family forms a strong foundation for many people's first and most intimate community. It is important to strengthen these first relationships so even uncommon questions become natural. For those...

PROBATE 44: Petition for Mental Health Treatment

Michigan’s Mental Health Code governs the civil admission and discharge procedures for a person with a mental illness. Specifically, MCL 330.1434 sets forth the procedure and content requirements for a petition for mental health treatment.

Should you get your criminal record expunged?

Originally posted on 04/12/2017 If you have been convicted of a crime, have served your sentence, and have followed all court recommendations, you should be able to put your past behind you and move on with life. Moving forward is critical...

Choosing the right executor for an estate

Originally posted on 05/28/2017 When people are thinking about planning their estate, they often think about trying to minimize the estate tax, keeping their will updated, and keeping items out of probate court; however, there is another...

Understanding how the Miranda warning works

Originally posted on 11/25/2016 Michigan residents who have seen television police shows or movies involving law enforcement have no doubt watched many dramatic scenes with officers quoting something to the effect of, "You have the...

Don't let a bad decision, unfair contract, or a messy divorce get in the way of a promising future!
Contact the experienced team at Aldrich Legal Services today to schedule your free initial
consultation
and secure reliable and trustworthy representation today!
Get the Help You Need From a Team You Can Truly Count On: (734) 404-3000
734-237-6482
734-366-4405